Biometrics in a data stream context

• Paulo Henrique Pisani USP
• André C. P. L. F. de Carvalho USP

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/ctd.2018.3650

Resumo

Biometric systems can provide safer authentication. However, biometric features may change over time, impacting the recognition performance due to outdated biometric references. It raises the need to automatically adapt the references over time, by using adaptive biometric systems. This thesis studied several aspects of adaptive biometric systems in a data stream context. Based on this investigation, it was observed that the best choice for each aspect can be user dependent. This motivated the proposal of a modular adaptive biometric system, which can select a different configuration for each user. It also generalizes several baselines and proposals into a single modular framework, while opening numerous opportunities for future work.

Referências

Aggarwal, C. C., Han, J., Wang, J., and Yu, P. S. (2003). A framework for clustering evolving data streams. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases - Volume 29, VLDB ’03, pages 81–92. VLDB Endowment.

Giot, R., Rosenberger, C., and Dorizzi, B. (2012a). Hybrid template update system for unimodal biometric systems. In 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS), pages 1–7. IEEE.

Giot, R., Rosenberger, C., and Dorizzi, B. (2012b). Performance evaluation of biometric template update. In International Biometric Performance Testing Conf., pages 1–4.

Jain, A., Ross, A., and Prabhakar, S. (2004). An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 14(1):4–20.

Jain, A. K., Nandakumar, K., and Ross, A. (2016). 50 years of biometric research: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities. Pattern Recog. Letters, 79:80 – 105.

Kaggle (2013). Accelerometer biometric competition.

Pisani, P. H. (2017). Biometrics in a data stream context. PhD thesis, ICMC-USP.

Pisani, P. H. and Lorena, A. C. (2013). A systematic review on keystroke dynamics. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 19(4):573–587.

Pisani, P. H. and Lorena, A. C. (2015). Emphasizing typing signature in keystroke dynamics using immune algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 34:178 – 193.

Pisani, P. H., Lorena, A. C., and Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F. (2015). Adaptive positive selection for keystroke dynamics. J. of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 80(1):277–293.

Poh, N., Kittler, J., Chan, C. H., and Pandit, M. (2015). Algorithm to estimate biometric performance change over time. IET Biometrics, 4(4):236–245.

Poh, N., Merati, A., and Kittler, J. (2009). Adaptive client-impostor centric score normalization: A case study in fingerprint verification. In IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, pages 1–7. IEEE.

Rattani, A. (2015). Introduction to Adaptive Biometric Systems, pages 1–8. Springer.

Rattani, A., Marcialis, G. L., and Roli, F. (2009). An Experimental Analysis of the Relationship between Biometric Template Update and the Doddington’s Zoo: A Case Study in Face Verification, pages 434–442. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Roli, F., Didaci, L., and Marcialis, G. (2008). Adaptive biometric systems that can improve with use. In Ratha, N. and Govindaraju, V., editors, Advances in Biometrics, pages 447–471. Springer London.

Stibor, T. and Timmis, J. (2005). Is negative selection appropriate for anomaly detection? ACM GECCO, pages 321–328.

Žliobaitė, I. (2010). Learning under concept drift: an overview. Technical report, Vilnius University.