Accessibility and Digital Identity: a case study about the adequacy of the institutional portal of the Catarinense Federal Institute
Abstract
The general orientations and practices in the implementation of governmental portals are based on many standards. Therefore, this paper seeks to present an overview of the adoption of these standards via a case study and adaptation of the institutional portal of an educational institution. These goals were divided in two periods: (a) reimplement the existing website considering the current accessibility standards, following the advocated models, the web standards, the Lei de Acesso à Informação and the Decreto n o 5.296, of 2004 from the Federal Government of Brazil and; (b) improve the applications’ administrative area fulfilling the security criteria and scale in adherence to the governmental standards offering accessibility and ubiquitous access.
References
ACOSTA, T.; LUJ ´AN-MORA, S.; ACOSTA-VARGAS, P. Method for accessibility assessment of heading in online editors. In: ACM. Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers. [S.l.], 2017. p. 243–247.
BOSCH, A. L. Van den; JONG, M. D. D.; ELVING, W. J. How corporate visual identity supports reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, v. 10, n. 2, p. 108–116, 2005.
BRASIL. Portaria no 3, de 7 de maio de 2007. 2007. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https: //www.governodigital.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/legislacao/portaria3 eMAG.pdf?. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2019.
DURAN, M. What we found when we tested tools on the world’s least-accessible webpage - Accessibility in government. 2019. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://accessibility.blog.gov.uk/2017/02/24/ what-we-found-when-we-tested-tools-on-the-worlds-least-accessible-webpage/?. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2019.
ENAP. Escola Nacional de Administracao Publica. eMAG Modelo de Acessibilidade de Governo Eletronico. 2015. Curso a distancia.
FERRAZ, R. Acessibilidade na Web. S˜ao Paulo: Senac, 2017.
FREIRE, A. P.; BITTAR, T. J.; FORTES, R. P. An approach based on metrics for monitoring web accessibility in brazilian municipalities web sites. In: ACM. Proceedings ofthe 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing. New York, NY, USA, 2008.
GHISLENI, T. S. Portais institucionais na web: analise de anuncios publicitarios no ecossistema midiatico. Santa Maria, RS, Brasil, 2016.
HYV ¨ARINEN, E. Modern wordpress development tools. Metropolia Ammattikorkea- koulu, 2018. Disponıvel em: ?https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/145428?. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2019.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat´ıstica. Censo demogr´afico 2010: caracter´ısticas gerais da populac¸ ˜ao, religi˜ao e pessoas com deficiˆencia. 2012. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/ caracteristicas religiao deficiencia/default caracteristicas religiao deficiencia.shtm?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
MINISTERIO DO PLANEJAMENTO, ORC¸ AMENTO E GESTAO. Brasil. eMAG Modelo de Acessibilidade em Governo Eletronico. Bras´ılia: MP, SLTI, 2014. Vers˜ao 3.1. Disponıvel em: ?https://www.governodigital.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/eMAGv31. pdf?. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2019.
PETRIE, H. et al. Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In: ACM. Proceedings ofthe SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA, 2006. p. 1133–1141.
QUEIROZ, M. A. Bengala Legal. 2008. Disponıvel em: ?http://www.bengalalegal.com/?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
TOMAEL, M. I. Fontes de informacao na Internet. Londrina: Eduel, 2008.
UNIDADE DE ACESSO. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia. Nota tecnica do validador accessmonitor. 2012. Disponıvel em: ?http://www.acessibilidade.gov.pt/ accessmonitor/nota tecnica.html?. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2019.
WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM. Web content accessibility guidelines overview. 2007. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM. Web content accessibility guidelines 2.1. 2018. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/?. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2019.
WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM BRASIL. Cartilha de Acessibilidade na Web. 2013. Dispon´ıvel em: ?http://www.w3c.br/pub/Materiais/PublicacoesW3C/ cartilha-w3cbr-acessibilidade-web-fasciculo-I.html?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
BOSCH, A. L. Van den; JONG, M. D. D.; ELVING, W. J. How corporate visual identity supports reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, v. 10, n. 2, p. 108–116, 2005.
BRASIL. Portaria no 3, de 7 de maio de 2007. 2007. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https: //www.governodigital.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/legislacao/portaria3 eMAG.pdf?. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2019.
DURAN, M. What we found when we tested tools on the world’s least-accessible webpage - Accessibility in government. 2019. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://accessibility.blog.gov.uk/2017/02/24/ what-we-found-when-we-tested-tools-on-the-worlds-least-accessible-webpage/?. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2019.
ENAP. Escola Nacional de Administracao Publica. eMAG Modelo de Acessibilidade de Governo Eletronico. 2015. Curso a distancia.
FERRAZ, R. Acessibilidade na Web. S˜ao Paulo: Senac, 2017.
FREIRE, A. P.; BITTAR, T. J.; FORTES, R. P. An approach based on metrics for monitoring web accessibility in brazilian municipalities web sites. In: ACM. Proceedings ofthe 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing. New York, NY, USA, 2008.
GHISLENI, T. S. Portais institucionais na web: analise de anuncios publicitarios no ecossistema midiatico. Santa Maria, RS, Brasil, 2016.
HYV ¨ARINEN, E. Modern wordpress development tools. Metropolia Ammattikorkea- koulu, 2018. Disponıvel em: ?https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/145428?. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2019.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat´ıstica. Censo demogr´afico 2010: caracter´ısticas gerais da populac¸ ˜ao, religi˜ao e pessoas com deficiˆencia. 2012. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/ caracteristicas religiao deficiencia/default caracteristicas religiao deficiencia.shtm?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
MINISTERIO DO PLANEJAMENTO, ORC¸ AMENTO E GESTAO. Brasil. eMAG Modelo de Acessibilidade em Governo Eletronico. Bras´ılia: MP, SLTI, 2014. Vers˜ao 3.1. Disponıvel em: ?https://www.governodigital.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/eMAGv31. pdf?. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2019.
PETRIE, H. et al. Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In: ACM. Proceedings ofthe SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA, 2006. p. 1133–1141.
QUEIROZ, M. A. Bengala Legal. 2008. Disponıvel em: ?http://www.bengalalegal.com/?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
TOMAEL, M. I. Fontes de informacao na Internet. Londrina: Eduel, 2008.
UNIDADE DE ACESSO. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia. Nota tecnica do validador accessmonitor. 2012. Disponıvel em: ?http://www.acessibilidade.gov.pt/ accessmonitor/nota tecnica.html?. Acesso em: 16 mar. 2019.
WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM. Web content accessibility guidelines overview. 2007. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM. Web content accessibility guidelines 2.1. 2018. Dispon´ıvel em: ?https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/?. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2019.
WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM BRASIL. Cartilha de Acessibilidade na Web. 2013. Dispon´ıvel em: ?http://www.w3c.br/pub/Materiais/PublicacoesW3C/ cartilha-w3cbr-acessibilidade-web-fasciculo-I.html?. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
Published
2019-06-26
How to Cite
CHAVES, Jefferson; SALVADOR, Yuri ; BRAZ, Jeliel ; PIFFER, Marcio ; HOSTIN, Erick ; RIEGEL, Ivo .
Accessibility and Digital Identity: a case study about the adequacy of the institutional portal of the Catarinense Federal Institute. In: NATIONAL COMPUTING MEETING OF FEDERAL INSTITUTES (ENCOMPIF), 6. , 2019, Belém.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2019
.
ISSN 2763-8766.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/encompif.2019.6355.
