Análise do Custo-benefício de Funções como Serviço e Infraestrutura como Serviço

• Waliff Cordeiro Bandeira UnB
• Leonardo Rebouças de Carvalho UnB
• Aleteia Patricia Favacho de Araujo UnB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/eradco.2021.18423

Abstract

Function as a Service (FaaS) offers high performance in it's applications to be used with high availability and payment based on demand. These features, however, come with a high added monetary value, which makes it not feasible to use this service full-time for various types of applications and contexts. To better understand this inflection point, it is necessary to test and compare, in a practical way, what is the acceptable threshold to choose a service among other options, before starting the application development. For this, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) will be used, which is a service that provides computing resources, IaaS was selected in order to compare and analyze the cost-benefit at the expense of FaaS.

References

Erinle, B. (2017). Performance Testing with JMeter 3. Packt Publishing.

Maissen, P., Felber, P., Kropf, P. G., and Schiavoni, V. (2020). Faasdom: A benchmark suite for serverless computing. CoRR, abs/2006.03271.

Sewak, M. and Singh, S. (2018). Winning in the era of serverless computing and function as a service. In 2018 3rd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), pages 1-5.