Compatibilidade entre a Qualidade do Ar Interno e a Percepção do Usuário
Abstract
Air pollution has progressively increased in recent years, becoming the most significant environmental risk to human health. For this reason, there must be an assessment of indoor air quality (IAQ) through data obtained by sensors and people's perception of whom frequent the monitored place. This paper describes an IoT-based solution for IAQ monitoring and how we calculate the compatibility between the sensed and perceived air quality.
References
ABNT (2008). Instalações de ar-condicionado sistemas centrais e unitários parte 3: Qualidade do ar interior.
Ashton, K. et al. (2009). That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFID journal, 22(7):97–114.
EPA, U. S. E. P. A. (2021). Indoor air quality (iaq). Disponível em: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/.
Kraus, M. et al. (2019). Assessment of the indoor environment for education. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, volume 290, page 012144.
Mohammed, M. A. et al. (2020). Psychosocial perception of the effects of harmattan dust on the environment and health of building occupants in maiduguri, nigeria. Facilities (IF), 38(13/14):893–912.
Nigam, S. et al. (2015). Air quality index-a comparative study for assessing the status of air quality. Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(2):267–274.
Pagel, E. C., Alvarez, C. E., and Reis Júnior, N. (2018). Avaliação e percepção do usuário em relação ao conforto térmico. Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos, 13(3):57–77.
Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50(302):157–175.
Teixeira, D. B. et al. (2005). Síndrome dos edifícios doentes em recintos com ventilação e climatização articiais: Revisão de literatura. In VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Defesa do Meio Ambiente, pages 1–11, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Ashton, K. et al. (2009). That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFID journal, 22(7):97–114.
EPA, U. S. E. P. A. (2021). Indoor air quality (iaq). Disponível em: https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/.
Kraus, M. et al. (2019). Assessment of the indoor environment for education. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, volume 290, page 012144.
Mohammed, M. A. et al. (2020). Psychosocial perception of the effects of harmattan dust on the environment and health of building occupants in maiduguri, nigeria. Facilities (IF), 38(13/14):893–912.
Nigam, S. et al. (2015). Air quality index-a comparative study for assessing the status of air quality. Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(2):267–274.
Pagel, E. C., Alvarez, C. E., and Reis Júnior, N. (2018). Avaliação e percepção do usuário em relação ao conforto térmico. Gestão e Tecnologia de Projetos, 13(3):57–77.
Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50(302):157–175.
Teixeira, D. B. et al. (2005). Síndrome dos edifícios doentes em recintos com ventilação e climatização articiais: Revisão de literatura. In VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Defesa do Meio Ambiente, pages 1–11, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Published
2021-08-26
How to Cite
SILVA, Melyssa M. G.; PEREIRA, Antônio E.; FRANÇA, Isabela F.; CORDEIRO, Bruna M. O. S.; SENE JUNIOR, Iwens. G.; BULCÃO-NETO, Renato F..
Compatibilidade entre a Qualidade do Ar Interno e a Percepção do Usuário. In: REGIONAL SCHOOL OF APPLIED COMPUTING FOR HEALTH (ERCAS), 8. , 2021, São Paulo.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2021
.
p. 78-81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/ercas.2021.17444.
