Real-Time Accessibility Dashboards for Higher Education
Resumo
Introduction: This work explores the challenges faced by students with disabilities in higher education; focusing on the accessibility of digital learning resources provided through Learning Management Systems (LMS). While inclusive education is a growing priority; many institutions still fall short of fully meeting accessibility standards. This lack of accessibility limits the participation and academic success of students with disabilities. Objective: This work aims to develop tools to help educators evaluate and improve the accessibility of content within LMS. Methodology: To support this goal; the project includes the development of a real-time accessibility dashboard; providing institutions with a centralized platform to monitor and address accessibility issues across their digital learning environments. Expected Results: By implementing these solutions; the project seeks to promote educational inclusion and enhance the academic success of students with disabilities.
Referências
Abuaddous, H., Zalisham, M., e Basir, N. (2016a). Web accessibility challenges. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(10).
Abuaddous, H. Y., Jali, M. Z., e Basir, N. (2016b). Quantitative Metric For Ranking Web Accessibility Barriers Based On Their Severity. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 16(1).
Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Ullauri, L. A., e Luján-Mora, S. (2019). A heuristic method to evaluate web accessibility for users with low vision. IEEE Access, 7:125634 125648.
Blackboard Inc. (2025). Blackboard ally – accessible content is better content. Website. [link].
Chen, W. (2021). Students with disabilities and digital accessibility in higher education under covid-19. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Chen, W. (2021). Students with disabilities and digital accessibility in higher education under covid-19. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Devine, H., Gonzalez, A., e Hardy, M. R. B. (2011). Making accessible pdf documents. pages 275–276.
Donnelly, A. e Magennis, M. (2003). Making accessibility guidelines usable. In Carbonell, N. e Stephanidis, C., editors, Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience, pages 56–67, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., e Fernández-Cerero, J. (2022). Access and participation of students with disabilities: The challenge for higher education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19).
Hassanzadeh, M. e Navidi, F. (2010). Web Site Accessibility Evaluation Methods In Action. The Electronic Library, 28(6):789–803.
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2025). Wcag 2 overview – web content accessibility guidelines. Website. [link] (Accessed: August 19, 2025).
Mateus, D. A., Silva, C. A., de Oliveira, A. F. B. A., Costa, H., e Freire, A. P. (2021). A systematic mapping of accessibility problems encountered on websites and mobile apps: A comparison between automated tests, manual inspections and user evaluations. J. Interact. Syst., 12:145–171.
Moodle.org (2025). Accessibility toolkit – moodledocs. Website. [link] (Accessed: August 19, 2025).
Nganji, J. (2018). An assessment of the accessibility of pdf versions of selected journal articles published in a wcag 2.0 era (2014–2018). Learned Publishing, 31.
Reed, M. e Curtis, K. (2012). Experiences of Students with Visual Impairments in Canadian Higher Education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(7):414 425.
Vigo, M., Brown, J., e Conway, V. (2013). Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: Measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A ’13, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Çakir, A. (2016). Usability and accessibility of portable document format. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35:324– 334.
