Systematic approach for migrating to a structured reporting context based on free-text reports and the DICOM Structured Reporting guidelines
Resumo
Even with the many advantages of adopting a structured reporting system, there is little convention on how to disseminate this routine into the report environment. This work proposes a systematic approach to migrate a system routine from free-text reports to structured reports, focusing on the DI- COM Structured Reporting guidelines. We evaluated this proposal by creating a reporting module in the context of a telemedicine system, and performing case study covering ultrasonography reports. Using the AdEQUATE model, the eval- uation showed a high user perception from the system, directly reflecting the quality of our proposal. The results are a set of defined premises and steps that turns a telemedicine system into a complete structured reporting environment.
Referências
Alves, J. M., Savaris, A., von Wangenheim, C. G., and von Wangenheim, A. (2016). Software quality evaluation of the laboratory information system used in the santa catarina state integrated telemedicine and telehealth system. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on, pages 76–81. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2016.51
Association, N. E. M. et al. (2015). Nema-the association of electrical equipment and medical imaging manufacturers.
Barcellos, C. L., von Wangenheim, A., and Andrade, R. (2011). A reliable approach for applying dicom structured reporting in a large-scale telemedicine network. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2011 24th International Symposium on, pages 1–6. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2011.5999049
Beckhauser, E., Petrolini, V. A., Savaris, A., Alves, J. M., and von Wangenheim, A. (2016). Are single-board computers an option for a low-cost multimodal telemedicine platform?: First tests in the context of santa catarina state integrated telemedicine and telehealth system. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on, pages 163–168. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2016.57
Boone, H. N. and Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of extension, 50(2):1–5.
Bosmans, J. M., Neri, E., Ratib, O., and Kahn Jr, C. E. (2015). Structured reporting: a fusion reactor hungry for fuel. Insights into imaging, 6(1):129–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0368-7
Bosmans, J. M., Weyler, J. J., De Schepper, A. M., and Parizel, P. M. (2011). The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the cover and rover surveys. Radiology, 259(1):184–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10101045
Clunie, D. A. (2000). DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed Publishing.
Dufresne, A. (1994). Deuxièmes journées francophones” hypermédias et apprentissage”. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 1(1):125–129.
Faggioni, L., Coppola, F., Ferrari, R., Neri, E., and Regge, D. (2017). Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an italian online survey. European radiology, 27(5):1934–1943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4553-6
Finstad, K. (2010). The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5):323–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
Garrett, J. J. (2010). Elements of user experience, the: user-centered design for the web and beyond. Pearson Education.
Homorodean, C., Olinic, M., and Olinic, D. (2012). Development of a methodology for structured reporting of information in echocardiography. Medical ultrasonography, 14(1):29.
Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schroeter, A., and Meinzer, H.-P. (2004). Dicom structured reporting: Part 2. problems and challenges in implementation for pacs workstations. Radiographics, 24(3):897–909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035722
Pianykh, O. S. (2009). Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. Springer Science & Business Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.064592
Pool, F. and Goergen, S. (2010). Quality of the written radiology report: a review of the literature. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7(8):634–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.016
Sánchez-Pi, N. and Molina, J. (2010). Adaptation of an evaluation system for e-health environments. Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pages 357–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15384-6_38
Towbin, A. J. and Hawkins, C. M. (2017). Use of a web-based calculator and a structured report generator to improve efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of radiology reporting. Journal of Digital Imaging, pages 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9967-4
von Wangenheim, C. G., von Wangenheim, A., McCaffery, F., Hauck, J. C. R., and Buglione, L.(2013). Tailoring software process capability/maturity models for the health domain. Health and Technology, 3(1):11–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-013-0038-7
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Association, N. E. M. et al. (2015). Nema-the association of electrical equipment and medical imaging manufacturers.
Barcellos, C. L., von Wangenheim, A., and Andrade, R. (2011). A reliable approach for applying dicom structured reporting in a large-scale telemedicine network. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2011 24th International Symposium on, pages 1–6. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2011.5999049
Beckhauser, E., Petrolini, V. A., Savaris, A., Alves, J. M., and von Wangenheim, A. (2016). Are single-board computers an option for a low-cost multimodal telemedicine platform?: First tests in the context of santa catarina state integrated telemedicine and telehealth system. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on, pages 163–168. IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2016.57
Boone, H. N. and Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of extension, 50(2):1–5.
Bosmans, J. M., Neri, E., Ratib, O., and Kahn Jr, C. E. (2015). Structured reporting: a fusion reactor hungry for fuel. Insights into imaging, 6(1):129–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0368-7
Bosmans, J. M., Weyler, J. J., De Schepper, A. M., and Parizel, P. M. (2011). The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the cover and rover surveys. Radiology, 259(1):184–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10101045
Clunie, D. A. (2000). DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed Publishing.
Dufresne, A. (1994). Deuxièmes journées francophones” hypermédias et apprentissage”. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 1(1):125–129.
Faggioni, L., Coppola, F., Ferrari, R., Neri, E., and Regge, D. (2017). Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an italian online survey. European radiology, 27(5):1934–1943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4553-6
Finstad, K. (2010). The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5):323–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
Garrett, J. J. (2010). Elements of user experience, the: user-centered design for the web and beyond. Pearson Education.
Homorodean, C., Olinic, M., and Olinic, D. (2012). Development of a methodology for structured reporting of information in echocardiography. Medical ultrasonography, 14(1):29.
Hussein, R., Engelmann, U., Schroeter, A., and Meinzer, H.-P. (2004). Dicom structured reporting: Part 2. problems and challenges in implementation for pacs workstations. Radiographics, 24(3):897–909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035722
Pianykh, O. S. (2009). Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. Springer Science & Business Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.064592
Pool, F. and Goergen, S. (2010). Quality of the written radiology report: a review of the literature. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7(8):634–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.016
Sánchez-Pi, N. and Molina, J. (2010). Adaptation of an evaluation system for e-health environments. Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pages 357–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15384-6_38
Towbin, A. J. and Hawkins, C. M. (2017). Use of a web-based calculator and a structured report generator to improve efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of radiology reporting. Journal of Digital Imaging, pages 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9967-4
von Wangenheim, C. G., von Wangenheim, A., McCaffery, F., Hauck, J. C. R., and Buglione, L.(2013). Tailoring software process capability/maturity models for the health domain. Health and Technology, 3(1):11–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-013-0038-7
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Publicado
11/06/2019
Como Citar
BECKAUSER, Eduardo; PETROLINI, Vinicius Andreoli; SAVARIS, Alexandre ; WANGENHEIM, Aldo von; KRECHEL, Dirk.
Systematic approach for migrating to a structured reporting context based on free-text reports and the DICOM Structured Reporting guidelines. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE COMPUTAÇÃO APLICADA À SAÚDE (SBCAS), 19. , 2019, Niterói.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2019
.
p. 94-105.
ISSN 2763-8952.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbcas.2019.6245.
