Evaluation of the TAEP4.0 by Basic Education Teachers: a Case Study in the Context of Education 4.0
Resumo
Education 4.0 is characterized as a learning paradigm to prepare students for life in the 21st-Century. Thus, a website was created, called TAEP4.0, that aims to support teachers of Basic Education in creating projects based on Education 4.0. This paper presents the evaluation of TAEP4.0. In this case study, the teachers used the TAEP4.0 to carry out projects in the Informatics lab. Then, the teachers answered a questionnaire about their experiences to verify the impacts of TAEP4.0 on their work. The results indicated that the TAEP4.0 allowed teachers to rethink the resources to compose their class, allowing the inclusion of Informatics in classes. Overall, the evaluation performed can improve and broaden teachers’ interaction with the TAEP4.0 and its resources.
Palavras-chave:
Education 4.0, Teacher Support, Basic Education, 21st-Century
Referências
Alda, R., Boholano, H., and Dayagbil, F. (2020). Teacher education institutions in the philippines towards Education 4.0. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8):137–154.
Ayub, E., Wei, G. W., Luaran, J. E., and Leong, L. C. (2018). An exploratory study of a framework for designing and developing a massive online course as smart future classroom in VLE. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-Technology, pages 57–62.
Butola, L. K. (2021). E-learning - a new trend of learning in 21st century during Covid-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(1):422–246.
Ciolacu, M., Svasta, P. M., Berg, W., and Popp, H. (2017a). Education 4.0 for tall thin engineer in a data driven society. In 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), pages 432–437. IEEE.
Ciolacu, M., Tehrani, A. F., Beer, R., and Popp, H. (2017b). Education 4.0 - fostering student’s performance with machine learning methods. In 2017 IEEE 23rd international symposium for design and technology in electronic packaging (SIITME), pages 438–443. IEEE.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
Dermeval, D., Albuquerque, J., Bittencourt, I. I., Vassileva, J., Lemos, W., da Silva, A. P., and Paiva, R. (2018). Amplifying teachers intelligence in the design of gamified intelligent tutoring systems. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 68–73. Springer.
Hartono, S., Kosala, R., Supangkat, S. H., and Ranti, B. (2018). Smart hybrid learning framework based on three-layer architecture to bolster up Education 4.0. In 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), pages 1–5. IEEE.
Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., and Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL):12–28.
Maria, M., Shahbodin, F., and Pee, N. C. (2018). Malaysian higher education system towards Industry 4.0 – current trends overview. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 2016, page 020081. AIP Publishing LLC.
Mourtzis, D. (2018). Development of skills and competences in manufacturing towards Education 4.0: A teaching factory approach. In International Conference on the Industry 4.0 model for Advanced Manufacturing, pages 194–210. Springer.
Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Tenório, T., Jaques, P., and Isotani, S. (2016). What do students do on-line? modeling students’ interactions to improve their learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 64:769–781.
Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2).
Silva, D. E., Lopes, T., Sobrinho, M. C., and Valentim, N. M. C. (2021a). Investigating initiatives to promote the advancement of Education 4.0: A Systematic Mapping Study. CSEDU (1), pages 458–466.
Silva, D. E., Sobrinho, M. C., and Valentim, N. M. C. (2021b). Utilizando o modelo ADDIE para o desenvolvimento e avaliação de um processo educacional inspirado na Educação 4.0. In Anais do XXIX Workshop sobre Educação em Computação, pages 448–457. SBC.
Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., and Williams, J. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching Environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences.
Ayub, E., Wei, G. W., Luaran, J. E., and Leong, L. C. (2018). An exploratory study of a framework for designing and developing a massive online course as smart future classroom in VLE. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-Technology, pages 57–62.
Butola, L. K. (2021). E-learning - a new trend of learning in 21st century during Covid-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(1):422–246.
Ciolacu, M., Svasta, P. M., Berg, W., and Popp, H. (2017a). Education 4.0 for tall thin engineer in a data driven society. In 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), pages 432–437. IEEE.
Ciolacu, M., Tehrani, A. F., Beer, R., and Popp, H. (2017b). Education 4.0 - fostering student’s performance with machine learning methods. In 2017 IEEE 23rd international symposium for design and technology in electronic packaging (SIITME), pages 438–443. IEEE.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
Dermeval, D., Albuquerque, J., Bittencourt, I. I., Vassileva, J., Lemos, W., da Silva, A. P., and Paiva, R. (2018). Amplifying teachers intelligence in the design of gamified intelligent tutoring systems. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 68–73. Springer.
Hartono, S., Kosala, R., Supangkat, S. H., and Ranti, B. (2018). Smart hybrid learning framework based on three-layer architecture to bolster up Education 4.0. In 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), pages 1–5. IEEE.
Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., and Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL):12–28.
Maria, M., Shahbodin, F., and Pee, N. C. (2018). Malaysian higher education system towards Industry 4.0 – current trends overview. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 2016, page 020081. AIP Publishing LLC.
Mourtzis, D. (2018). Development of skills and competences in manufacturing towards Education 4.0: A teaching factory approach. In International Conference on the Industry 4.0 model for Advanced Manufacturing, pages 194–210. Springer.
Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Tenório, T., Jaques, P., and Isotani, S. (2016). What do students do on-line? modeling students’ interactions to improve their learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 64:769–781.
Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2).
Silva, D. E., Lopes, T., Sobrinho, M. C., and Valentim, N. M. C. (2021a). Investigating initiatives to promote the advancement of Education 4.0: A Systematic Mapping Study. CSEDU (1), pages 458–466.
Silva, D. E., Sobrinho, M. C., and Valentim, N. M. C. (2021b). Utilizando o modelo ADDIE para o desenvolvimento e avaliação de um processo educacional inspirado na Educação 4.0. In Anais do XXIX Workshop sobre Educação em Computação, pages 448–457. SBC.
Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., and Williams, J. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching Environment: a conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences.
Publicado
16/11/2022
Como Citar
SILVA, Deivid Eive dos S.; CORRÊA SOBRINHO, Marialina; VALENTIM, Natasha Malveira C..
Evaluation of the TAEP4.0 by Basic Education Teachers: a Case Study in the Context of Education 4.0. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE INFORMÁTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO (SBIE), 33. , 2022, Manaus.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2022
.
p. 15-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbie.2022.224622.