Acceptance Analysis of a Learner Experience Evaluation Model

• Gabriela Corbari dos Santos Universidade Federal do Paraná http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-1534
• Deivid Eive dos S. Silva Universidade Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-0750
• Letícia Mara Peres Universidade Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-6975
• Natasha M. C. Valentim Universidade Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-3452

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbie.2024.241385

Resumo

Learner eXperience (LX) is defined as the perceptions, answers, and performances of learners interacting with learning environments, educational products, and resources. Thus, we proposed a model to assess and support the improvement of the learner? 's experience using Digital Information and Communication Technologies (DICTs) during learning, called [anonymous]. This paper presents the acceptance analysis of the [anonymous] and its evolution with twelve learners and one higher education teacher. The acceptance evaluation carried out in this study is important because it helps to improve and verify the contribution of the [anonymous] model, based on the perception of learners and teacher, who are the stakeholders in the educational process.

Referências

Camilleri, V., de Freitas, S., Montebello, M., and McDonagh-Smith, P. (2013). A case study inside virtual worlds: Use of analytics for immersive spaces. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’13, page 230–234, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Corbin, J. et al. (1990). Basics of qualitative research grounded theory procedures and techniques.

Correa, C. M., de Freitas, G. V. M., dos Santos Eberhardt, A. L., and Silveira, M. S. (2021). From now on: Experiences from user-based research in remote settings. In Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC ’21, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3):319–340.

Dos Santos, G. C., Dos S. Silva, D. E., and C. Valentim, N. M. (2023). Proposal and preliminary evaluation of a learner experience evaluation model in information systems. In Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, SBSI ’23, page 308–316, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery

Huang, R., Spector, J. M., and Yang, J. (2019). Educational Technology a Primer for the 21st Century. Springer.

ISO9241-210 (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — part 210: Humancentred design for interactive systems. [Online; acessado em 23/02/2022].

Kawano, A., Motoyama, Y., and Aoyama, M. (2019). A lx (learner experience)-based evaluation method of the education and training programs for professional software engineers. In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, ICIET 2019, page 151–159, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Lang, P. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. Technology in mental health care delivery systems, pages 119–137.

Martinelli, S. R. and Zaina, L. A. M. (2021). Learning hci from a virtual flipped classroom: Improving the students’ experience in times of covid-19. In Proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC ’21, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Moody, D. L. (2003). The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods.

Najib, M. and Fahma, F. (2020). Investigating the adoption of digital payment system through an extended technology acceptance model: An insight from the indonesian small and medium enterprises. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(4):1702–1708.

Ruiz, J. and Snoeck, M. (2018). Adapting kirkpatrick’s evaluation model to technology enhanced learning. In MODELS ’18: ACM/IEEE 21th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS ’18, page 135–142, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

Schmidt, M. and Huang, R. (2022). Defining learning experience design: Voices from the field of learning design & technology. TechTrends, 66(2):141–158.

Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., and Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for hci in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2):36–48.

Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2):273–315.

Wazlawick, R. (2019). Engenharia de software: conceitos e práticas , volume 2. Elsevier Editora Ltda., Rio de Janeiro.

Yeh, S.-W. and Chen, C.-T. (2019). Efl learners’ peer negotiations and attitudes in mobileassisted collaborative writing. Language Education & Assessment, 2(1):41–56.