Education 4.0 and 21st Century Skills: A Case Study with Robotics Activities in Classroom
Resumo
One of the most researched topics in Education 4.0 is the use of robotics in education. In this paper, we performed a case study related to skills developed for Education 4.0 through robotics activities, without involving competition. Students followed the process suggested by LEGO Education Maker and answered a self-assessment questionnaire about their developed skills and participated in a focus group. The teacher also reported her perceptions about the developed skills. We performed a qualitative analysis and the results indicated that robotics activities helped students to develop some skills, but it is still necessary to propose new approaches that will support students more in robotics activities.
Palavras-chave:
robótica educacional, educação 4.0, competências do século XXI, LEGO Education Maker, análise qualitativa
Referências
Benitti, F., Spolaor, N. (2017). How Have Robots Supported STEM Teaching? In Robotics in STEM Education, pp. 103-129.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In: Griffin P., McGaw B., Care E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 17-66.
Cross, J., Hamner, E., Zito, L., Nourbakhsh, I. (2016). Engineering and computational thinking talent in middle school students: a framework for defining and recognizing student affinities. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-9.
de França, B., Ribeiro, T., Santos, P., Travassos, G. (2015). Using Focus Group in Software Engineering: Lessons Learned on Characterizing Software Technologies in Academia and Industry. In Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 351-364.
Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. In Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, v. 8 (1), pp. 5-11.
Grigoreanu, V., Fernandez, R., Inkpen, K., Robertson, G. (2009). What Designers Want: Needs of Interactive Application Designers. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, pp. 139-146.
LEGO® MINDSTORMS® Education EV3 - Maker Activities – Secondary School. Available in [link]. Accessed in February, 2018.
Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New Challenge of Learning. In St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, v. 2 (2), pp. 92-97.
Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. In Journal of Science Education and Technology, v. 17(1), pp. 59-69. Available: [link].
Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Rodenhauser, T., Marks, A. (2015). Promoting Work-based Learning through INDUSTRY 4.0. In Procedia CIRP, v. 32, pp. 82-87.
Wallner, T., Wagner, G. (2016). Academic Education 4.0. In International Conference on Education and New Developments, pp. 155-159.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Available: [link]
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In: Griffin P., McGaw B., Care E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 17-66.
Cross, J., Hamner, E., Zito, L., Nourbakhsh, I. (2016). Engineering and computational thinking talent in middle school students: a framework for defining and recognizing student affinities. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-9.
de França, B., Ribeiro, T., Santos, P., Travassos, G. (2015). Using Focus Group in Software Engineering: Lessons Learned on Characterizing Software Technologies in Academia and Industry. In Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 351-364.
Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. In Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, v. 8 (1), pp. 5-11.
Grigoreanu, V., Fernandez, R., Inkpen, K., Robertson, G. (2009). What Designers Want: Needs of Interactive Application Designers. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, pp. 139-146.
LEGO® MINDSTORMS® Education EV3 - Maker Activities – Secondary School. Available in [link]. Accessed in February, 2018.
Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New Challenge of Learning. In St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, v. 2 (2), pp. 92-97.
Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., Pezalla-Granlund, M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: Strategies for broadening participation. In Journal of Science Education and Technology, v. 17(1), pp. 59-69. Available: [link].
Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Rodenhauser, T., Marks, A. (2015). Promoting Work-based Learning through INDUSTRY 4.0. In Procedia CIRP, v. 32, pp. 82-87.
Wallner, T., Wagner, G. (2016). Academic Education 4.0. In International Conference on Education and New Developments, pp. 155-159.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Available: [link]
Publicado
29/10/2018
Como Citar
MESSIAS, Glaucio; RODRIGUES, Ueliton; BRAGA, Luis; NAKAMURA, Walter; FERREIRA, Bruna; PAIVA, Alex; VALENTIM, Natasha.
Education 4.0 and 21st Century Skills: A Case Study with Robotics Activities in Classroom. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE INFORMÁTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO (SBIE), 29. , 2018, Fortaleza/CE.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2018
.
p. 715-724.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2018.715.
