Mapping Factors that Impact on Motivation of Undergraduate Students in Software Engineering: A case study
Resumen
This paper presents a case study with the evaluation of factors that impact on the motivation of 112 undergraduate students in a Software Engineering program. Considering that motivation and engagement are key aspects of students’ success, the goal of this paper is the identification of the factors that contribute to students' motivation and engagement. We applied a questionnaire which evaluates 48 motivational factors divided into 6 groups: personal and demographic data, general perception of motivation, perception about the university, student behavior, perception about program and perception about class/teacher. As results, after applying statistic tests, we found 15 factors with significant variance in the type of students’ motivation, only 3 factors with variance in the approval rate, and 5 factors with variance in the overall grade average. We conclude that, for the sample used, the perception of student behavior is associated with his/her performance. The type of motivation is associated mainly with the perception about the program, classes, and faculty. The intention of dropout is mainly associated with the perception of the classes and faculty.
Citas
BERGIN, S.; REILLY, R. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on. Proceedings of the 17th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, PPIG 05. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex. 2005. p. 293 - 304.
BRUINSMA, M. Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 14, n. 6, December 2004. 549–568. Disponível em: [link]. Access on: 13 October 2016.
CARTER, L. Why Students with an Apparent Aptitude for Computer Science Don’t Choose to Major in Computer Science. Proceedings of SIGCSE 2009. Houston, Texas, USA: [s.n.]. 2006.
DEBDI; PAREDES-VELASCO; VELÁZQUEZ-ITURBIDE, J. Á. Relationship between learning styles, motivation and educational efficiency in students of computer science. 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE). Logroño: IEEE. 2014. p. 13-16.
ENTWISTLE, N. Concepts and conceptual frameworks underpinning the ETL project. ETL Project. Edinburgh, Scotland. 2003.
FERREIRA, C. E. Evasão: alguns dados e muitas dúvidas. XXXV Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação. Recife: [s.n.]. 2015.
FRANÇA, A. C. C. et al. Motivation in Software Engineering: A Systematic Review Update. Proceedings of EASE 2011. [S.l.]: [s.n.]. 2011. p. 10.
JENKINS, T.; DAVY, J. Diversity and Motivation in Introductory Programming. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 2002. 1-9.
KASUNIC, M. Designing an Effective Survey. Software Engineering Institute - Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, PA, p. 143. 2005. (CMU/SEI-2005-HB-004).
KORI, et al. The Role of Programming Experience in ICT Students’ Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, n. 5, Maio 2016.
KURKOVSKY, S. Improving Student Motivation in a Computing Course for Non-Majors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science & Computer Engineering (FECS 2006). Las Vegas, USA: [s.n.]. 2006.
MARTIN, A. J. Motivation and Engagement Scale- University/College. Lifelong Achievement Group. [S.l.]. 2015.
NAVARRO, E. O.; VAN DER HOEK, A. On the Role of Learning Theories in Furthering Software Engineering Education. Software Engineering: Effective Teaching and Learning Approaches and Practices, 2009. 38-59.
NIITSOO, M. et al. Predictors of Informatics Students Progress and Graduation in University Studies. Proceedings of INTED2014 Conference. Valencia, Spain: [s.n.]. 2014.
NOOR, N. M.; HARUN, J.; ARIS, B. Application of the Pedagogical and Andragogical Model in Web-Based Learning Instruction among Non-Major Computer Science Students Learning Programming. Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering. Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia: IEEE. 2014. p. 106 - 111.
PETERS, A.-K.; PEARS, A. Engagement in Computer Science and IT – What! A Matter of Identity? Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society. 2013. p. 114-121.
RYAN, R. M.; DECI, E. L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000. 54-67.
SERRANO-CÁMARA, L. M. et al. An evaluation of students’ motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning of programming concepts. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 2013. 499–508.
SHELL, D. F.; SOH, L.-K. Understanding Student Motivation and Strategic Engagement in Computer Science and STEM Courses. DBER Speaker Series. Lincoln, p. 45. 2015.
SINCLAIR, J. et al. Measures of Student Engagement in Computer Science. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITICSE 2015). New York, NY, USA: ACM. 2015. p. 242-247.
SOENENS, B.; VANSTEENKISTE, M. Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, n. 6, 2005. 589–604.
VALLERAND, R. J. E. A. The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, n. 4, 1992. 1003-1017.
YACOB, A.; SAMAN, M. Y. M. Assessing Level of Motivation in Learning Programming Among Engineering Students. The International Conference on Informatics and Applications (ICIA2012). Malaysia: [s.n.]. 2012. p. 425-432.
