Como desenvolvedor quero utilizar user story para representar os requisitos que levam à definição do MVP e criação de Mockups

  • Taynah Almeida UFAM
  • Ana Carolina Oran UFAM
  • Gleison Santos UNIRIO
  • Tayana Conte UFAM

Resumo


User stories refletem necessidades de um usuário e o MVP (Minimum Viable Product) tem por objetivo validar um produto junto aos seus usuários. Com o propósito de avaliar se user stories auxiliam na definição do MVP, este artigo apresenta os resultados de um estudo experimental que mostram a aceitação positiva da user story para especificar requisitos, definir o MVP e construir mockups, em virtude da sua facilidade de uso e simplicidade. Os resultados mostram que os defeitos encontrados após a inspeção dos mockups não foram gerados a partir de defeitos inseridos na especificação da user story, mas devido ao fato de os participantes não seguirem a especificação para a construção dos mockups.

Referências

Agarwal, N. and Rathod, U. (2006). Defining ‘success’ for software projects: An exploratory revelation. International journal of project management, v. 24, n. 4, pages 358–370.

Almeida, T., Oran, A.C., Santos, G. e Conte, T. (2017). Relatório técnico: Como desenvolvedor quero utilizar user story para representar os requisitos que levam à definição do MVP e criação de Mockups. TR-USES-2017-0014. Disponível em: http://uses.icomp.ufam.edu.br/relatorios-tecnicos/.

Basili, V. R. and Rombach, H. D. (1988). The TAME project: Towards improvement oriented software environments. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, v. 14, n. 6, pages 758–773.

Beck, K. (1999). Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer, v. 32, n. 10, pages 70–77.

Breitman, K. and do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2002). Managing user stories. In International Workshop on Time-Constrained Requirements Engineering, page 168.

Breitman, K. and do Prado Leite, J. S. (2000). Scenario-based software process. In Proceedings Seventh IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS 2000), pages 375–380.

Caroli, P. (2015). Direto ao ponto: criando produtos de forma enxuta. Casa do Código.

Carrera Barroso, A., Solitario, J. J. and Iglesias Fernandez, C. A. (2012). Behaviour driven development for multi-agent systems. In: International Workshop on Infrastructures and Tools for Multiagent Systems, page 107-120.

Cooper, B. and Vlaskovits, P. (2010). The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Customer Development. Paperback.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, pages 319–340.

Duc, A. N. and Abrahamsson, P. (2016). Minimum viable product or multiple facet product? the role of mvp in software startups. In International Conference on Agile Software Development, pages 118–130. Springer.Höst, M., Regnell, B. and Wohlin, C. (2000). Using students as subjects—a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment. Empirical Software Engineering, pages 201–214.

Keogh, E. (2010). BDD: A Lean Toolkit. In: Proc. of Lean Software & Systems Conf..

Khanh, N. T., Daengdej, J. and Arifin, H. H. (2017). Human stories: A new written technique in agile software requirements. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications (ICSCA 2017), pages 15–22.

Laitenberger, O. and Dreyer, H. M. (1998). Evaluating the usefulness and the ease of use of a web-based section data collection tool. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics, pages 122 132.

Lanubile, F., Mallardo, T. and Calefato, F. (2003). Tool support for Geographically Dispersed Inspection Teams. In Software Process Improvement and Practice, pages 217 – 231.

Lazăr, I., Motogna, S. and Pârv, B. (2010). Behaviour-driven development of foundational UML components. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, pages 91 – 105.

Luna, E. R., Panach, J. I. and Grigera, J. et al. (2010). Incorporating usability requirements in a test/model-driven engineering approach. Journal of Web Engineering, v. 9, n. 2, pages 132 – 156.

Moogk, D. R. (2012). Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups. Technology Innovation Management, v. 2, n. 3, page 23.

Münch, J., Fagerholm, F., Johnson, P., Pirttilahti, J., Torkkel, J. and Jäarvinen, J. (2013). Creating minimum viable products in industry-academia collaborations. In Lean Enterprise Software and Systems, pages 137-151.

North, D. (2006). “Introducing bdd”, http://dannorth.net/introducing-bdd/, Março.

Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T. and Abrahamsson, P. (2014). Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study. In Information and Software Technology, v. 56, n. 10, pages 1200–1218.

Ries, E. (2014). A startup enxuta, Leya, 1ª edição.

Silva, T. R. (2016). Definition of a behavior-driven model for requirements specification and testing of interactive systems. In Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2016 IEEE 24th International, pages 444–449. IEEE.

Solis, C. and Wang, X. (2011). A study of the characteristics of behaviour driven development. In Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pages 383–387.

Sutcliffe, A. (1998). Scenario-based requirements analysis. In: Requirements engineering, v. 3, n. 1, pages 48-65.

Travassos, G., Shull, F., Fredericks, M. and Basili, V. R. (1999). Detecting defects in object-oriented designs: using reading techniques to increase software quality. In ACM Sigplan Notices, v. 34, n. 10, pages 47–56. ACM.

Zeaaraoui, A., Bougroun, Z., Belkasmi, M. G. and Bouchentouf, T. (2013). User stories template for object-oriented applications. In Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH), 2013 Third Intl. Conf. on, pages 407–410. IEEE.
Publicado
28/08/2017
Como Citar

Selecione um Formato
ALMEIDA, Taynah; ORAN, Ana Carolina; SANTOS, Gleison; CONTE, Tayana. Como desenvolvedor quero utilizar user story para representar os requisitos que levam à definição do MVP e criação de Mockups. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE QUALIDADE DE SOFTWARE (SBQS), 16. , 2017, Rio de Janeiro. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2017 . p. 251-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2017.15105.