Expert Mentoring: Intelligent assistant to clarify doubts about the determination of objective evidence required in the MPS.BR evaluation

  • Lívia Maria Omena da Silva UFAL
  • Rodrigo de Barros Paes UFAL
  • Evandro de Barros Costa UFAL

Abstract


This paper presents an intelligent assistant, called Expert Mentoring, whose goal is to support managers responsible for processes GPR and GRE in the allocation of objective evidences, that are most appropriate for verification of the results contained in the spreadsheet of indicators used in evaluation MPS.BR. It is intended with this assistant, reproduce the behavior of the implementer to simulate the resolution of problems of interpretation of the results that occur while filling the spreadsheet. However, it is not intended to replace the implementer and, yes, support you in clarifying these doubts. It is hoped that this tool could be useful to organizations that will be submitted the assessment process.
Keywords: Intelligent Assistant, Evidence Determination, Expert Mentoring

References

Adderley, T., Duggins, S. and Tsui, F. (2010) “An examination of a rule-based expert system to aid in the implementation of the CMMI framework”.

Astrom, K. J., Anton, J. J. and Arzen, K. E. (1986) “Expert Control”, In: Automatica, v.22, n.3, p.277-286.

Carnegie Mellon (2006) “CMMI for Development” (v1.2), Software Engineering Institute.

Castillo, E., Gutiérrez, J. M. and Hadi, Ali S. (1997) “Expert systems and probabilistic network models”, New York: Springer, cap. 1 e 2, p.1-65.

Clancey, William J. and Letsinger, Reed (1982) “Neomycin: reconfiguring a rulebased expert system for application to teaching”, Computer Science Department Stanford University, Stanford.

Chrissis, M. B., Konrad, M. and Shrum, S. (2006) “CMMI (Second Edition): Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement”, Addison Wesley Professional.

Duda, R. O. and Shortliffe, E. H. (1983) “Expert Systems Research”, In: Science, v.220, n.4594.

Dunaway, D. K. and Masters, S. (2001) “CMMR-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI) Version 1.2 Method Description”, Carnegie Mellon.

Eldrandaly, K. (2008) “A Knowledge-Based Advisory System for Software Quality Assurance”, In: The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, v.5, n.3.

El-Emam, K., et al. (1998) “Cost Implications of Interrater Agreement for Software Process Assessments”, In: International Software Engineering Research Network Technical Report ISERN-98-14, v.4.

Fayad, M. E. and Laitinen, M. (1997) “Process Assessment Considered Wasteful” , In: Communications of the ACM, v.40, n.11, p.125-128.

Griesmer, J. H., et al. (1984) “YEWMVS: A Continuous Real Time Expert System”, AAAI-84 Proceedings.

Groothuis, M. M. and Svensson, J. (2000) “Expert system support and juridical quality”, In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, The Thirteenth Annual Conference.

Herbsleb, J., et al. (1994) “Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results”, Empirical Methods, Carnegie Mellon University.

Herrera, E. M. and Ramírez, R. A. T. (2003) “A Methodology for Self-Diagnosis for Software Quality Assurance in Small and Medium-Sized Industries in Latin America”.

International Standard (2008) "ISO/IEC 12207: Systems and software engineering - software life cycle processes".

International Standard (2004) "ISO/IEC 15504-1: Information technology - process assessment".

Karabatak, M. and Ince, M. C. (2009) “An expert system for detection of breast cancer based on association rules and neural network”, In: Expert Systems with applications.

Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J. and Metzger, V. A. (1985) “Identifying objects by touch: An expert system”, In: Perception & Psychophysics.

LIA - Laboratório de Inteligência Artificial. (199_?) “Expert Sinta versão 1.1: uma ferramenta visual para criação de sistemas especialistas”, Manual do Usuário.

Liao, Shu-Hsien (2005) “Expert system methodologies and applications: a decade review from 1995 to 2004”, In: Expert Systems with Applications.

Loken, C. B. and Skramstad, T. (1996) “ISO 9000 certification: Experiences from Europe”, In: Product Assurance Symposium and Software Product Assurance Workshop, Proceedings of the meetings held, European Space Agency, p.295-301.

Montoni, M. A. (2010) “Uma investigação sobre os fatores críticos de sucesso em iniciativas de melhoria de processos de software”, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (Tese de Doutorado), p.328, Rio de Janeiro.

Olson, T. G., Humphrey, W. S. and Kitson, D. (1989) “Conducting SEI-Assisted Software Process Assessments”, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-89-TR-7, ESD-89-TR 7. p.1-62. Pittsburgh.

Paulk, M. C., Weber, C. V. and Curtis, M. C. (1995) “The Capability Maturity Modelsm for Software: Guidelines for Improving the Software”, Software Engineering Institute.

Rocha, Ana R. C., et al. (2006) "Dificuldade e Fatores de Sucesso na Implementação de Processos de Software Utilizando o MR-MPS e o CMMI", I Workshop de Implementadores (W2-MPS.BR).

Rodrigues, J. F. (2009) “Avaliação da implantação do MPS.BR: um estudo empírico sobre benefícios, dificuldades e fatores de sucesso” , Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba (Dissertação de Mestrado).

Softex (2009a) “MPS.BR - Melhoria de Processo do Software Brasileiro, Guia Geral (v1.2)”, SOFTEX - Associação para Promoção da Excelência do Software Brasileiro.

Softex (2009b) “MPS.BR - Melhoria de Processo do Software Brasileiro, Guia de Avaliação”, SOFTEX - Associação para Promoção da Excelência do Software Brasileiro.

Stelzer, Dirk and Mellis, Werner (1999) “Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement”, Software Process Improvement and Practice, v.4, p.1-34, Issue 4, Germany.
Published
2011-06-06
SILVA, Lívia Maria Omena da; PAES, Rodrigo de Barros; COSTA, Evandro de Barros. Expert Mentoring: Intelligent assistant to clarify doubts about the determination of objective evidence required in the MPS.BR evaluation. In: BRAZILIAN SOFTWARE QUALITY SYMPOSIUM (SBQS), 10. , 2011, Curitiba. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2011 . p. 393-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2011.15411.