Uma Abordagem para Medição e Análise em Projetos de Desenvolvimento de Software
Resumo
Durante o processo de Medição e Análise é desenvolvida e implantada a capacidade de avaliação das medidas que servirão como importantes fontes de informação para a gerência da Organização. A melhor abordagem para seleção das medidas adequadas é a que define, antes de tudo, o que a Organização deseja ou precisa saber, e somente então escolhe as medidas apropriadas. Este artigo apresenta uma abordagem para o processo de Medição e Análise em projetos de desenvolvimento de software baseada no método Goal-Question-Metrics (GQM) e nos requisitos da área de processo Medição e Análise do CMMI. Apresenta também duas ferramentas de apoio à abordagem proposta.
Palavras-chave:
Medição e Análise, Qualidade de Software, Ambiente de Desenvolvimento de Software
Referências
AHERN, D.M.; CLOUSE, A; TURNER, R., 2001, CMMI Distilled, Addison Wesley.
BASILI. V.; CALDIERA, G.; ROMBACH, H., 1994, “Goal Question Metric Paradigm”, In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, v.2, pp: 527 – 532.
FLORAC, W., CARLETON, A., 1999, Measuring the Software Process: Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley.
GOETHERT, W., HAYES, W., 2001, “Experiences in Implementing Measurements Programs”, Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Initiative, CMU/SEI- 2001-TN-026
GOETHERT, W., FISCHER, M., 2003, “Deriving Enterprise-Based Measures Using the Balanced Scorecard and Goal-Driven Measurement Techniques”, Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Initiative, CMU/SEI-2003-TN-024
GOLDENSON, D.R., JARZOMBEK, J., ROUT, T., 2003, “Measurements and Analysis in Capability Maturity Model Integration and Software Process Improvement”, CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, July.
HOLMES, L., 2002, IT Measurements Practical Advice from the Experts, Addison-Wesley
McGARRY, J., CARD, D., JONES, C. et all, 2001, Practical Software Measurement: Objective Information for Decision Makers, Addison-Wesley.
MONTONI, M., MIRANDA, R., ROCHA, A. R.. TRAVASSOS, G. H., “Knowledge Acquisition and Communities of Practice: An Approach to Convert Individual Knowledge into Multi-Organizational Knowledge”, In: Workshop Learning Software Organization, Banff, 2004.
PAULK, M. C., WEBER, C.A., WHITE, D., ZUCCHER, M., 2002, Unpublished data from a study high maturity organizations.
RUBIN, H., 1992, “The Making Measurement Happen Workshop” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applications of Software Measurements, La Jolla, California, November.
SOLINGEN, R.; BERGHOUT, E., 1999, The Goal/Question/Metric Method: a Practical Guide for Quality Improvement of Software Development, McGraw-Hill.
VILLELA, K., OLIVEIRA, K. M., SANTOS, G., ROCHA, A. R. C., TRAVASSOS, G. H. Cordis-FBC: an Enterprise Oriented Software Development Environment In: Workshop Learning Software Organization, Luzern, 2003
ZUBROW, D., 2001, “The Measurement and Analysis Process Area in CMMI”, ASQ Software Quality Newsletter.
ZUBROW, D., 1998, “Measurement With a Focus: Goal-Driven Software Measurement?”, CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, September.
CMU/SEI, Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Version 1.1 - Staged Representation, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, 2002.
BASILI. V.; CALDIERA, G.; ROMBACH, H., 1994, “Goal Question Metric Paradigm”, In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, v.2, pp: 527 – 532.
FLORAC, W., CARLETON, A., 1999, Measuring the Software Process: Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley.
GOETHERT, W., HAYES, W., 2001, “Experiences in Implementing Measurements Programs”, Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Initiative, CMU/SEI- 2001-TN-026
GOETHERT, W., FISCHER, M., 2003, “Deriving Enterprise-Based Measures Using the Balanced Scorecard and Goal-Driven Measurement Techniques”, Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Initiative, CMU/SEI-2003-TN-024
GOLDENSON, D.R., JARZOMBEK, J., ROUT, T., 2003, “Measurements and Analysis in Capability Maturity Model Integration and Software Process Improvement”, CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, July.
HOLMES, L., 2002, IT Measurements Practical Advice from the Experts, Addison-Wesley
McGARRY, J., CARD, D., JONES, C. et all, 2001, Practical Software Measurement: Objective Information for Decision Makers, Addison-Wesley.
MONTONI, M., MIRANDA, R., ROCHA, A. R.. TRAVASSOS, G. H., “Knowledge Acquisition and Communities of Practice: An Approach to Convert Individual Knowledge into Multi-Organizational Knowledge”, In: Workshop Learning Software Organization, Banff, 2004.
PAULK, M. C., WEBER, C.A., WHITE, D., ZUCCHER, M., 2002, Unpublished data from a study high maturity organizations.
RUBIN, H., 1992, “The Making Measurement Happen Workshop” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applications of Software Measurements, La Jolla, California, November.
SOLINGEN, R.; BERGHOUT, E., 1999, The Goal/Question/Metric Method: a Practical Guide for Quality Improvement of Software Development, McGraw-Hill.
VILLELA, K., OLIVEIRA, K. M., SANTOS, G., ROCHA, A. R. C., TRAVASSOS, G. H. Cordis-FBC: an Enterprise Oriented Software Development Environment In: Workshop Learning Software Organization, Luzern, 2003
ZUBROW, D., 2001, “The Measurement and Analysis Process Area in CMMI”, ASQ Software Quality Newsletter.
ZUBROW, D., 1998, “Measurement With a Focus: Goal-Driven Software Measurement?”, CrossTalk The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, September.
CMU/SEI, Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Version 1.1 - Staged Representation, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, 2002.
Publicado
31/05/2004
Como Citar
SCHNAIDER, Lílian; SANTOS, Gleison; MONTONI, Mariano; ROCHA, Ana Regina.
Uma Abordagem para Medição e Análise em Projetos de Desenvolvimento de Software. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE QUALIDADE DE SOFTWARE (SBQS), 3. , 2004, Brasília.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2004
.
p. 276-286.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2004.16199.
