Conectando usuários vulneráveis e veículos: um ecossistema para prevenção de acidentes de trânsito em cidades inteligentes

Resumo


Os sistemas de mobilidade urbana têm impulsionado o desenvolvimento de soluções que integram veículos, infraestrutura e usuários. Nessa linha, este artigo apresenta um ecossistema conectado para identificar antecipadamente riscos de colisão entre veículos e usuários vulneráveis por meio de notificações multimodais entre sistemas embarcados e dispositivos móveis. A proposta foi avaliada em laboratório, simulando a complexidade do ecossistema, com participantes como motoristas e pedestres. Os resultados indicam que notificações multimodais no ecossistema podem apoiar motoristas e pedestres na percepção de risco em cenários cooperativos de mobilidade urbana.

Referências

Batty, M. (2018). Digital twins. Environment and planning B: Urban analytics and City Science, 45(5):817–820.

Clérigo, A., Schrapel, M., Teixeira, P., Rito, P., Sargento, S., and Vinel, A. (2024). Safearcross: Augmented reality collision warnings and virtual traffic lights for pedestrian safety. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 63–73.

Courage, C. and Baxter, K. (2005). Understanding your users: a practical guide to user requirements methods, tools, and techniques. Gulf Professional Publishing.

Endsley, M. R. (2021). Situation awareness. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, pages 434–455.

Hernandez-Jayo, U., De-la Iglesia, I., and Perez, J. (2015). V-alert: Description and validation of a vulnerable road user alert system in the framework of a smart city. Sensors, 15(8):18480–18505.

Khan, M. J., Khan, M. A., Beg, A., Malik, S., and El-Sayed, H. (2022). An overview of the 3gpp identified use cases for v2x services. Procedia Computer Science, 198:750–756.

Kim, H., Gabbard, J. L., Anon, A. M., and Misu, T. (2018). Driver behavior and performance with augmented reality pedestrian collision warning: An outdoor user study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(5):1948–1958.

Lee, W.-S., Kim, J.-H., and Cho, J.-H. (1998). A driving simulator as a virtual reality tool. In Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 98CH36146), volume 1, pages 71–76. IEEE.

Lisboa, P., Dos Santos, F., Ribeiro, H., Campos, P., and Zaina, L. (2023). Making roads safer: a vehicle blind spot alert system co-designed with end-users. In Proceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–11.

Ma, J., Li, J., and Huang, H. (2022). Evaluation of multimodal and multi-staged alerting strategies for forward collision warning systems. Sensors, 22(3):1189.

Moradi-Pari, E., Tian, D., Bahramgiri, M., Rajab, S., and Bai, S. (2023). Dsrc versus lte-v2x: Empirical performance analysis of direct vehicular communication technologies. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(5):4889–4903.

Morra, L., Lamberti, F., Pratticó, F. G., La Rosa, S., and Montuschi, P. (2020). Building trust in autonomous vehicles: Role of virtual reality driving simulators in hmi design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(9):9396–9409.

Muslim, H. and Antona-Makoshi, J. (2022). A review of vehicle-to-vulnerable road user collisions on limited-access highways to support the development of automated vehicle safety assessments. Safety, 8(2):26.

Oka, D. K. (2021). Building secure cars: assuring the automotive software development lifecycle. John Wiley & Sons.

Rahimian, P., O’Neal, E. E., Zhou, S., Plumert, J. M., and Kearney, J. K. (2018). Harnessing vehicle-to-pedestrian (v2p) communication technology: Sending traffic warnings to texting pedestrians. Human Factors, 60(7):946–959.

Selcon, S. J. and Taylor, R. M. (1990). Evaluation of the situational awareness rating technique(sart) as a tool for aircrew systems design. AGARD, Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations 8 p(SEE N 90-28972 23-53).

Silva, R. M., Azevedo, G. F., Berto, M. V., Rocha, J. R., Fidelis, E. C., Nogueira, M. V., Lisboa, P. H., and Almeida, T. A. (2025). Vulnerable road user detection and safety enhancement: A comprehensive survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 292:128529.

Tahmasbi-Sarvestani, A., Mahjoub, H. N., Fallah, Y. P., Moradi-Pari, E., and Abuchaar, O. (2017). Implementation and evaluation of a cooperative vehicle-to-pedestrian safety application. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 9(4):62–75.

Vinayaga-Sureshkanth, N., Maiti, A., Jadliwala, M., Crager, K., He, J., and Rathore, H. (2018). A practical framework for preventing distracted pedestrian-related incidents using wrist wearables. IEEE Access, 6:78016–78031.

Weir, D. H. and Clark, A. J. (1995). A survey of mid-level driving simulators. SAE transactions, pages 86–106.

Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A., et al. (2012). Experimentation in software engineering, volume 236. Springer.

Zoghlami, C., Kacimi, R., and Dhaou, R. (2023). 5g-enabled v2x communications for vulnerable road users safety applications: A review. Wireless Networks, 29(3):1237–1267.

Zöller, I., Betz, A., Mautes, N., Scholz, L., Abendroth, B., Bruder, R., and Winner, H. (2015). Valid representation of a highly dynamic collision avoidance scenario in a driving simulator. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 31:54–66.
Publicado
19/07/2026
TOYOTA, Thiago et al. Conectando usuários vulneráveis e veículos: um ecossistema para prevenção de acidentes de trânsito em cidades inteligentes. In: SEMINÁRIO INTEGRADO DE SOFTWARE E HARDWARE (SEMISH), 53. , 2026, Gramado/RS. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2026 . p. 239-250. ISSN 2595-6205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/semish.2026.22257.