ROI in UX Design: Preliminary Evidence from Interviews with Industry Professionals

  • Gessé Evangelista UFSCar
  • Luciana Zaina UFSCar

Resumo


Measuring business outcomes in UX Design is essential for establishing design as a strategic practice within organizations. However, despite growing interest in demonstrating UX value, this measurement remains poorly structured in professional practice. This paper investigates the characteristics of business outcome measurement in UX Design, focusing on the metrics adopted, the perceived relevance of this practice, and the main challenges involved. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten UX professionals from different organizations and analyzed the data through open coding and thematic analysis. The findings show that professionals perceive measurement not only as a way to assess financial return, but also as a strategic mechanism for legitimizing UX, supporting prioritization, and communicating value to stakeholders. Participants reported combining financial and behavioral metrics, while relying mainly on operational tools rather than formal ROI frameworks. The main barriers identified were organizational and cultural, including lack of structure, limited recognition of UX, and difficulties in isolating the impact of design on business outcomes. As a practical contribution, we summarize four actionoriented recommendations to support more mature and data-driven UX measurement practices.
Palavras-chave: User eXperience (UX), Return on Investment (ROI), UX Measurement, Business Impact

Referências

Adebesin, F. and Chawana, T. (2021). The current state of measuring return on investment in user experience design. South African Computer Journal, 33(1):22–36.

Albert, W. and Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Elsevier Science, 2 edition.

Aleryani, A. (2020). The impact of the user experience (ux) on the quality of the requirements elicitation. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications, 10(1):1–9.

Aydin, B. and Beruvides, M. (2014). Development of a decision tool for usability cost justification. In IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2014, pages 2832–2838.

Berni, A., Borgianni, Y., Basso, D., and Carbon, C. (2023). Fundamentals and issues of user experience in the process of designing consumer products. Design Science, 9.

Borriraklert, A. and Kiattisin, S. (2021). User experience design (uxd) competency model: Identifying well-rounded proficiency for user experience designers in the digital age. Archives of Design Research, 34:61–79.

Chow, A. and Croxton, R. (2014). A usability evaluation of academic virtual reference services. College & Research Libraries, 75(3):309–361.

Dixon, M., Freeman, K., and Toman, N. (2010). Stop trying to delight your customers. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8):116–122.

Horvath, J. (2020). The Business Value of UX: Taking ROI to an Institutional Level. Human Factors International, Inc.

Karat, C. and Karat, J. (2020). The challenges and opportunities of measuring the user experience. Journal of Usability Studies, 15(3):123–135.

Reichheld, F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12):46–54.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, 3 edition.

Sauro, J. (2016). The challenges and opportunities of measuring the user experience. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(1):1–7.

Stige, Å., Zamani, E., Mikalef, P., and Zhu, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence for user experience design: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Information Technology People, 37:2324–2352.

Trendowicz, A. et al. (2023). User experience key performance indicators for industrial iot systems: A multivocal literature review. Digital Business, 3(1):100057.
Publicado
19/07/2026
EVANGELISTA, Gessé; ZAINA, Luciana. ROI in UX Design: Preliminary Evidence from Interviews with Industry Professionals. In: WORKSHOP SOBRE ASPECTOS SOCIAIS, HUMANOS E ECONÔMICOS DE SOFTWARE (WASHES), 11. , 2026, Gramado/RS. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2026 . p. 141-151. ISSN 2763-874X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/washes.2026.23925.