Women in Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Last Five Years
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the five years of the Women in Technology (WIT). The research uses indicators of Productivity and Impact, as well as indicators of Scientific Collaboration. The analysis reveals that the number of papers, authors and citations has increased over the years. On the other hand, the scientif collaborations network appears fragmented, with many groups publishing in isolation. It is possible to conclude that WIT is strengthening itself as a space for sharing experiences and knowledge of an active community interested in the theme of women in technology.
Keywords:
Bibliometric Analysis, Social Network Analysis, Women in Technology
References
Fonseca, E. N. d. (1986). Bibliometria: teoria e prática., volume 1. Cultrix, Ed. da USP.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3):215–239.
Katerndahl, D. (2012). Evolution of the research collaboration network in a productive department. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1):195–201.
Lauschner, T., de Freitas, R., Nakamura, F., and Lobo, L. (2016). Cunhantã digital: programa de incentivo a participação de mulheres da região amazônica na computação e áreas afins. In Anais do X Women in Information Technology, pages 20–24. SBC.
Mochetti, K., Salgado, L., Zerbinato, A. V., Souza, B. L., and Avelino, M. R. E. (2016). Ciencia da computação também é coisa de menina! In Anais do X Women in Information Technology, pages 11–15. SBC.
Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1):5200–5205.
Rehn, C. and Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric Handbook, volume 1. Karolinska Institutet University Library.
Solis, P. et al. (2016). Abertura do X Women in Information Technology. In X Women in Technology (WIT).
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, volume 8. Cambridge university press.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3):215–239.
Katerndahl, D. (2012). Evolution of the research collaboration network in a productive department. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1):195–201.
Lauschner, T., de Freitas, R., Nakamura, F., and Lobo, L. (2016). Cunhantã digital: programa de incentivo a participação de mulheres da região amazônica na computação e áreas afins. In Anais do X Women in Information Technology, pages 20–24. SBC.
Mochetti, K., Salgado, L., Zerbinato, A. V., Souza, B. L., and Avelino, M. R. E. (2016). Ciencia da computação também é coisa de menina! In Anais do X Women in Information Technology, pages 11–15. SBC.
Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(1):5200–5205.
Rehn, C. and Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric Handbook, volume 1. Karolinska Institutet University Library.
Solis, P. et al. (2016). Abertura do X Women in Information Technology. In X Women in Technology (WIT).
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, volume 8. Cambridge university press.
Published
2021-07-18
How to Cite
BORDIN, Andréa Sabedra; FERRÃO, Isadora Garcia; BRANCO, Kalinka R. L. J. C..
Women in Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Last Five Years. In: WOMEN IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (WIT), 15. , 2021, Evento Online.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2021
.
p. 250-259.
ISSN 2763-8626.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wit.2021.15861.
