Caracterização Temporal e Modelagem Matemática da Rede de Cabos Submarinos

  • Rafael de Oliveira Costa UFRJ
  • Daniel Ratton Figueiredo UFRJ

Abstract


Fiber optic cables laid under the sea (submarine cables) are responsible for 99% of today’s Internet traffic. Characterizing the evolution of the network composed by submarine cables is crucial for understanding the capacity and robustness of the Internet. Based on public data, this paper describes the evolution of the submarine cable network over more than three decades, presenting the temporal evolution of several network properties. Results indicate that this network has very particular properties, not found in other communication networks (such as absence of cycles and many connected components). Thus, a new model to represent the growth of the submarine cable network over time is proposed and evaluated in this work.

References

Barabási, A.-L. (2014). Network science book. Network Science, 625.

Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. AAAS Science, 286(5439):509–512.

Bischof, Z. S., Fontugne, R., and Bustamante, F. E. (2018). Untangling the world-wide mesh of undersea cables. In ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, pages 78–84.

Cao, C., Zukerman, M., Wu, W., Manton, J. H., and Moran, B. (2013). Survivable topology design of submarine networks. IEEE Journal of lightwave technology, 31(5):715–730.

Chesnoy, J. (2015). Undersea fiber communication systems. Academic press.

Coffey, V. (2014). Sea change: The challenges facing submarine optical communications. Optics and Photonics News, 25(3):26–33.

Goldenberg, A. (2009). A survey of statistical network models. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 2:129–233.

Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., and Swart, P. J. (2008). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. In Varoquaux, G., Vaught, T., and Millman, J., editors, Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference, pages 11 – 15.

Kolaczyk, E. D. (2009). Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models. Springer.

McCurdy, A., Shelton, A., Burns, B., Bayly, C., Handa, E., Gerstell, G., Fortain, J., Joensuu, J., Duvernay, L., Lingle, R., et al. (2018). Submarine telecoms industry report. In Submarine Telecoms Forum, Inc., Tech. Rep.

Msongaleli, D. L., Dikbiyik, F., Zukerman, M., and Mukherjee, B. (2016). Disaster-aware submarine fiber-optic cable deployment for mesh networks. IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, 34(18):4293–4303.

Staudt, C. L., Hamann, M., Gutfraind, A., Safro, I., and Meyerhenke, H. (2017). Generating realistic scaled complex networks. Applied Network Science, 2:36.

Tapolcai, J., Hajdú, Z. L., Pašić, A., Ho, P.-H., and Rónyai, L. (2021). On network topology augmentation for global connectivity under regional failures. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 1–10.

TeleGeography. Submarine cable map. https://www.submarinecablemap.com.

Wang, T., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Guo, C., Moran, B., and Zukerman, M. (2021). Optimal tree topology for a submarine cable network with constrained internodal latency. IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, 39(9):2673–2683.

Xie, Y., Wang, C., and Huang, J. (2022). Structure and evolution of the submarine cable network of chinese mainland. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(5):932–956.
Published
2023-08-06
COSTA, Rafael de Oliveira; FIGUEIREDO, Daniel Ratton. Caracterização Temporal e Modelagem Matemática da Rede de Cabos Submarinos. In: WORKSHOP ON PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (WPERFORMANCE), 22. , 2023, João Pessoa/PB. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2023 . p. 25-36. ISSN 2595-6167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wperformance.2023.231089.