Artificial Intelligence and Software Development: Biases, Privacy, and Ethical Responsibility

• Breno Salu Souza de Oliveira UFV
• Elisa Ribeiro Gonçalves UFV
• Emanuel Teixeira Martins UFV
• Rian Lucas da Silva Valadão UFV
• Yasmin Souza Lima UFV
• Liziane Santos Soares UFV

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wsis.2025.14896

Abstract

This paper addresses ethical issues in the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, with an emphasis on algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the social impact of these technologies. The technical, social, and legal implications of large-scale AI adoption are analyzed through case studies and recent research. Solutions such as promoting algorithmic transparency, strengthening the ethical training of professionals, and developing joint guidelines among academic institutions, government, and the private sector are discussed. It is emphasized that an interdisciplinary approach is essential to ensure that AI development is fair, responsible, and aligned with democratic values, contributing to a more ethical and inclusive technological future.

References

Adadi, A. and Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE access, 6:52138–52160.

Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Inter-sectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pages 77–91. PMLR.

Butterick, M. and Joseph Saveri Law Firm & Craft (2022). Github copilot litigation. Acesso em 19 jun. 2025. Disponível em: [link].

Christina Tikkinen-Piri, Anna Rohunen, J. M. (2017). Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council. Elsevier Science-Direct Journals, 34(1):134.

Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret ai recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Acesso em 19 jun. 2025. Disponível em: [link].

Dressel, J. and Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science advances, 4(1):eaao5580.

European Union (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. [link]. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. In Proceedings of the conference on Computers, freedom and privacy, pages 21–30. ACM.

Garcia, L. R., Aguilera-Fernandes, E., Gonçalves, R. A. M., and Pereira-Barretto, M. R. (2020). Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD): guia de implantação. Editora Blucher.

Gomes, E. B., Vaz, A. A., and de Oliveira Dias, S. M. (2021). Limites éticos para o uso da inteligência artificial no sistema de justiça brasileiro, de acordo com a lei 13.709 de 2018 (lgpd) e resoluções 331 e 332 do conselho nacional de justiça. Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito, 13:107–124. Acesso em 17 jun. 2025. Epub 08-Set-2022.

IEEE (2017). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems, Version 1. IEEE.

Landymore, F. (2024). Stack overflow bans users for protesting against it selling their answers to openai as training data. The Byte. Acesso em 19 jun. 2025. Disponível em: [link].

OECD (2019). Oecd ai principles. [link]. Accessed: 2025-07-03.

Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., and Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 59–68.

Sobrinho, G. (2025). Como a inteligência artificial está revolucionando o desenvolvimento de software em 2025. Acesso em 23 jun. 2025. Disponível em: [link].

Zag Sites, K. A. S. M. (2025). O que é inteligência artificial? Acesso em 23 jun. 2025. Disponível em: [link].