TACT: An insTrument to Assess the organizational ClimaTe of agile teams - A Preliminary Study
Keywords:Organizational climate, Agile software development, Human factor influence
Background: Measuring the organizational climate of agile teams is a challenge for organizations, mainly because of the shortages of specific instruments to agile methodologies. On the other hand, finding companies willing to participate in the preliminary validation of an instrument is a challenge for researchers of the organizational climate. The preliminary validation allows identifying problems and improvements in the instrument. Objective: We present the preliminary evaluation of TACT. TACT is an instrument to assess the organization climate of agile teams. Its initial version comprises the Communication, Collaboration, Leadership, Autonomy, DecisionMaking, and Client Involvement dimensions. Method: We planned and executed a case study considering three development teams. We evaluated TACT using openended questions, quantitative methods, and TAM dimensions of Intention to Use, Perceived Usefulness, and Output Quality. Results: TACT allowed to classify the organizational climate of the teams for all dimensions. Some items were assessed negatively or neutrally, which represent points of attention. TACT captured the lack of agile ceremonies, the difficulty of the product owner in planning iterations, and the distance in leadership. In addition, TACT dimensions presented high levels of reliability. Conclusions: TACT captured the organizational climate of the teams adequately. The team leaders reported intention of future use. The items that compose TACT can be used by researchers investigating the influence of human factors in agile teams, and practitioners that need to design organizational climate assessments of agile teams. By using an instrument adapted to assess the organizational climate of agile teams, an organization can better identify issues and improvement actions aligned with agile values, principles, and practices.
Açikgöz, A. (2017). The Mediating Role of Team Collaboration between Procedural Justice Climate and New Product Development Performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(04):1750039.
Acuña, S. T., Gómez, M., and Juristo, N. (2008). Towards understanding the relationship between team climate and software quality—a quasi-experimental study. Empirical Software Engineering, 13(4):401–434.
Açıkgöz, A. and Gunsel, A. (2016). Individual Creativity and Team Climate in Software Development Projects: The Mediating Role of Team Decision Processes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(4):445–463.
Açıkgöz, A., Günsel, A., Bayyurt, N., and Kuzey, C. (2014). Team Climate, Team Cognition, Team Intuition, and Software Quality: The Moderating Role of Project Complexity. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23(5):1145–1176.
Açıkgöz, A. and Ö. İlhan, Ö. (2015). Climate and Problem Solving in Software Development Teams. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207(20 October 2015):502–511.
Ahmed, S., Ahmed, S., Naseem, A., and Razzaq, A. (2017). Motivators and Demotivators of Agile Software Development: Elicitation and Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(12):1–11.
Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,37(4):634.
Anderson, N. R. and West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3):235–258.
Annosi, M. C., Martini, A., Brunetta, F., and Marchegiani, L. (2020). Learning in an agile setting: A multilevel research study on the evolution of organizational routines. Journal of Business Research, 110:554–566.
Askarinejadamiri, Z. (2016). Personality requirements in requirement engineering of web development: A systematic literature review. In 2016 Second International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), pages 183–188, Tehran, Iran. IEEE.
Bandura, A. (2006). Summary for Policymakers. In Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, editor, Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis, pages 1–30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beck, K., Beedle, M., and et al. Bennekum, A Van (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Chagas, A. (2015). (In Portuguese) O impacto dos fatores humanos nos métodos ágeis.
Chagas, A. (2015). (In Portuguese) O impacto dos fatores humanos nos métodos ágeis.
Chagas, A., Santos, M., Santana, C., and Vasconcelos, A. (2015). The Impact of Human Factors on Agile Projects. In 2015 Agile Conference, pages 87–91, National Harbor, MD, USA. IEEE.
Curtis, B., Hefley, W. E., and Miller, S. A. (2009). People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM ) Version 2.0, Second Edition. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University.
Davis, K. G., Kotowski, S. E., Daniel, D., Gerding, T., Naylor, J., and Syck, M. (2020). The Home Office: Ergonomic Lessons From the “New Normal”. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 28(4):4–10.
Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., and Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology.
Digital.ai, T. (2020). 14th Annual State of Agile Report. Technical report, Digital.ai.
Dima, A. L. (2018). Scale validation in applied health research: tutorial for a 6-step R-based psychometrics protocol. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1):136–161.
Dutra, E., Diirr, B., and Santos, G. (2021). Human factors and their influence on software development teams - a tertiary study. In BrazilianSymposiumonSoftwareEngineering, SBES ’21, page 442–451, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Dutra, E., Lima, P., and Santos, G. (2020). An Instrument to Assess the Organizational Climate of Agile Teams - A Preliminary Study. In 19th Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality, pages 1–10, São Luis, Brazil. ACM.
Dutra, E. and Santos, G. (2020). Organisational climate assessments of Agile teams – a qualitative multiple case study. IET Software, 14(7):861–870.
Dutra, J. S., Fischer, A. L., Nakata, L. E., Pereira, J. C. R., and Veloso, E. F. R. (2012). The use categories as indicator of organizational climate in Brazilian companies. Revista de Carreiras e Pessoas, 2:145–176.
Dybå, T. (2000). Instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement. Empirical Software Engineering, 5:357–390.
Dybå, T. and Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9-10):833–859.
Field, A., Miles, J., and Field, Z. (2012). Discovering Statistics Using R. SAGE Publications, London, 1 edition.
Franca, A., Gouveia, T., Santos, P., Santana, C., and da Silva, F. (2011). Motivation in software engineering: a systematic review update. In 15th Annual Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011), pages 154–163, Durham, UK. IET.
Ganesh, M. P. (2013). Climate in software development teams: Role of task interdependence and procedural justice. Asian Academy of Management Journal.
Ganesh, M. P. and Gupta, M. (2006). Study of Virtualness, Task Interdependence, Extra-Role Performance and Team Climate in Indian Software Development Teams. Proceedings of the 20th Australian New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference on Management, Pragmatism, Philosophy, Priorities, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, 20:1–19.
González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., and Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength and team performance. A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3):511–536.
Graziotin, D., Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., and Wagner, S. (2020). Psychometrics in Behavioral Software Engineering: A Methodological Introduction with Guidelines. ACMTrans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., I(1):Article 111 – 49 pages.
Grobelna, K. and Stefan, T. (2019). The Impact of Organizational Climate on the Regularity of Work Speed of Agile Software Development Teams. Entrepreneurhip and Management, 12(1):229–241.
Hinkle, D., Wiersma, W., and Jurs, S. (2003). Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 5 edition.
Hoda, R., Kruchten, P., Noble, J., and Marshall, S. (2010). Agility in context. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 45(10):74–88.
Hohl, P., Klünder, J., van Bennekum, A., Lockard, R., Gifford, J., Münch, J., Stupperich, M., and Schneider, K. (2018). Back to the future: origins and directions of the “Agile Manifesto” – views of the originators. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 6(1):15.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2):179–185.
Jia, J., Zhang, P., and Capretz, L. F. (2016). Environmental factors influencing individual decision-making behavior in software projects. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, pages 86–92, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):141–151.
Karhatsu, H., Ikonen, M., Kettunen, P., Fagerholm, F., and Abrahamsson, P. (2010). Building blocks for self-organizing software development teams: A framework model and empirical pilot study. In ICSTE 2010 - 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering, Proceedings.
Kettunen, P. (2014). Directing High-Performing Software Teams: Proposal of a Capability-Based Assessment Instrument Approach. In Bergsmann J., editor, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, chapter Model-Base, pages 229–243. Springer, Cham.
Klünder, J., Karajic, D., Tell, P., Karras, O., Münkel, C., Münch, J., MacDonell, S. G., Hebig, R., and Kuhrmann, M. (2020). Determining Context Factors for Hybrid Development Methods with Trained Models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes, pages 61–70, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology.
Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1):159.
Lee, J.-N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information and Management, 38(5):323–335.
Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., and Wallgren, L. G. (2015). Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 107(September 2015):15–37.
Licorish, S. A. and MacDonell, S. G. (2014). Understanding the attitudes, knowledge sharing behaviors and task performance of core developers: A longitudinal study. Information and Software Technology, 56(12):1578–1596.
McAvoy, J. and Butler, T. (2007). The impact of the Abilene Paradox on double-loop learning in an agile team. Information and Software Technology, 49(6):552–563.
Miller, G. J. (2020). Framework for Project Management in Agile Projects: A Quantitative Study.
Misra, S. C., Kumar, V., and Kumar, U. (2009). Identifying some important success factors in adopting agile software development practices. Journal of Systems and Software.
Moe, N. B., Dings, T., and Dyb, T. (2008). Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development. In 19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008), pages 76–85. IEEE.
Moe, N. B. and Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Scrum and team effectiveness: Theory and practice. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., and Øyvind, K. (2009). Understanding Shared Leadership in Agile Development: A Case Study. In 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 1–10. IEEE.
Nianfang Ji and Jie Wang (2012). A software project management simulation model based on team climate factors analysis. In 2012 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, pages 304–308, Sanya, China. IEEE.
Noll, J., Razzak, M. A., Bass, J. M., and Beecham, S. (2017). A Study of the Scrum Master’s Role. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), pages 307–323. Springer, Innsbruck, Austria.
Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., and Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4):379–408.
PMI,P.M.I.andAgileAlliance,A.A.(2017). AgilePractice Guide. PMI, Pennsylvania, 1st edition.
Recker, J. (2013). Scientific Research in Information Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Revelle, W. (2018). How to: Use the psych package for factor analysis and data reduction. Technical report, Northwestern University.
Runeson, P. and Höst, M. (2009). Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 14(2):131–164.
Schneider, B., Barbera, K. M., Schneider, B., and Barbera, K. M. (2014). Summary and Conclusion. In Barbera, B. S. and M., K., editors, The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture, chapter Summary an, pages 1–14. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Senapathi, M. and Srinivasan, A. (2013). Sustained agile usage. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering - EASE ’13, page 119, New York, New York, USA. ACM Press.
Serrador, P., Gemino, A., and Horner, B. (2018). Creating a climate for project success. Journal of Modern Project Management, May/August:38–47.
Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., and Shahbaz, M. (2017). Organizational culture and innovation performance in Pakistan’s software industry. Technology in Society, 51:66–73.
Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2012). Impact of organisational climate and demographics on project specific risks in context to Indian software industry. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2):176–187.
Shull, F., Singer, J., and Sjøberg, D. I. (2008). Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer London, London.
Soomro, A. B., Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Grundy, J., Burch, G., and Nordin, A. (2016). The effect of software engineers’ personality traits on team climate and performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 73(May 2016):52–65.
Spector, P. (1992). Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. Sage Publications, Inc.
Stewart, K. J. and Gosain, S. (2006). The moderating role of development stage in free/open source software project performance. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 11(2):177–191.
Stone, R. W. and Bailey, J. J. (2007). Team Conflict Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy of Business Students. Journal of Education for Business, 82(5):258–266.
VandenBos, G. R. E. (2017). APA Dictionary of Psychology.
Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2):273–315.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2):186–204.
Vishnubhotla, S. D., Mendes, E., and Lundberg, L. (2018). An Insight into the Capabilities of Professionals and Teams in Agile Software Development. In Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications - ICSCA 2018, pages 10–19, New York, New York, USA. ACM Press.
Vishnubhotla, S. D., Mendes, E., and Lundberg, L. (2020). Investigating the relationship between personalities and agile team climate of software professionals in a telecom company. Information and Software Technology, 126:106335.
Wagner, S., Mendez, D., Felderer, M., Graziotin, D., and Kalinowski, M. (2020). Contemporary Empirical Methods in Software Engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 5 edition.
Zaineb, G., Shaikh, B., and Ahsan, A. (2012). Recommended cultural and business practices for project based software organization of Pakistan for supporting restructuring of functional organization for implementing agile based development framework in software projects. In 2012 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, pages 16–20. IEEE.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Eliezer Goncalves, Patrícia Lima, Cristina Cerdeiral, Bruna Diirr, Gleison Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.