Diretrizes para a Promoção do Senso de Presença na Educação a Distância
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2022.2590Palavras-chave:
Senso de Presença, Educação a Distância, Mundos VirtuaisResumo
Embora em ascensão, observa-se que a Educação a Distância (EAD) ainda possui uma percepção popular de qualidade inferior em comparação com o Ensino Presencial. Estima-se que carências como as de relações interpessoais, do uso de tecnologias mais interativas e dinâmicas, e da realização de práticas profissionais contribuam para essa percepção. Buscando atuar nestas fragilidades, esta pesquisa propõe um suporte midiático composto por Mundos Virtuais (MVs) e Non-Player Characteres (NPCs), com um destes NPCs integrado à tecnologia de Agente Conversacional, atuando na função de Companheiro Virtual. Como aspecto principal, investiga-se o senso de presença, um construto da dimensão afetiva definido como a sensação de “estar lá”. Um total de 132 estudantes realizou uma atividade extracurricular em um de três grupos: Controle, que utilizou o Ambiente Virtual de Aprendizagem web tradicional; Experimental, que utilizou o MV; e Real Experimental, que utilizou o MV com o Companheiro Virtual. Com base nos resultados e discussões e buscando responder à questão de pesquisa “Como promover o senso de presença de forma a contribuir com o processo de aprendizagem na EAD?” foi organizada uma estrutura com sete diretrizes que direcionam o uso das tecnologias mencionadas a fim de se beneficiar de suas potencialidades.
Downloads
Referências
ABED, Associação Brasileira de Educação a Distância. (2019) Censo EAD.BR 2018. Relatório analítico da aprendizagem a distância no Brasil, Curitiba: InterSaberes. [GS Search]
Alenezi, A. M., & Shahi, K. K. (2015). Interactive e-learning through second life with blackboard technology. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 176, 891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.555 [GS Search]
Alsaaty, F. M., Carter, E., Abrahams, D. and Alshameri, F. (2016) Traditional versus online learning in institutions of higher education: Minority business students’ perceptions. In Business and Management Research, 5(2), 31-41. doi: 10.5430/bmr.v5n2p31 [GS Search]
Battal, A., & Tokel, S. T. (2020). Investigating the Factors Affecting Students' Satisfaction in a Programming Course Designed in 3D Virtual Worlds. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2). doi: 10.17569/tojqi.611707 [GS Search]
Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103-124. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01 [GS Search]
Caruso, V., Mørch, A. I., Thomassen, I., Hartley, M., & Ludlow, B. (2014). Practicing collaboration skills through role-play activities in a 3D virtual world. In the new development of technology enhanced learning (pp. 165-184). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38291-8_10 [GS Search]
Chow, M. (2016). Determinants of presence in 3D virtual worlds: A structural equation modelling analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1). doi: 10.14742/ajet.1939 [GS Search]
Coelho, C., Tichon, J. G., Hine, T. J., Wallis, G. M., & Riva, G. (2006). Media presence and inner presence: the sense of presence in virtual reality technologies. In From communication to presence: Cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience (pp. 25-45). IOS Press, Amsterdam. [GS Search]
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008 [GS Search]
Dalcim, M. G. F. (2018). A Autonomia e os processos de mudança: um estudo sobre a desistência em um curso online. CIET:EnPED:2018 (Congresso Internacional de Educação e Tecnologias / Encontro de Pesquisadores em Educação a Distância). [GS Search]
Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10 (2), 4-36. doi: 10.1080/08923649609526919 [GS Search]
Díaz, J. E. M., Saldaña, C. A. D., & Avila, C. A. R. (2020). Virtual World as a Resource for Hybrid Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, (15). doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i15.13025 [GS Search]
Doğan, D., Çınar, M., & Tüzün, H. (2017). Multi-user virtual environments for education. Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games, 1-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9_172-1 [GS Search]
Domingo, J. R., & Bradley, E. G. (2018). Education student perceptions of virtual reality as a learning tool. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(3), 329-342. doi: 10.1177/0047239517736873 [GS Search]
Franceschi, K., Lee, R. M., Zanakis, S. H., & Hinds, D. (2009). Engaging group e-learning in virtual worlds. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 73-100. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260104 [GS Search]
Fox, J., Christy, K. R., & Vang, M. H. (2014). The Experience of Presence in Persuasive Virtual Environments. In Interacting with presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments. DeGruyter Open. ISBN: 978-3-11-040967-3. doi: 10.2478/9783110409697.11 [GS Search]
Girvan, C., & Savage, T. (2019). Virtual worlds: A new environment for constructionist learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 396-414. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.017 [GS Search]
Hartley, M. D., Ludlow, B. L. & Duff, M. C. (2015) Second Life®: A 3D virtual immersive environment for teacher preparation courses in a distance education program. In Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34(3), 21-25. [GS Search]
Hassell, M., Goyal, S., Limayem, M., & Boughzala, I. (2009). Being there: An empirical look at learning outcomes in 3D virtual worlds. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 733. [GS Search]
Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(1), 169-182. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.010 [GS Search]
Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to- face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial intelligence in education, 11(1), 47-78. [GS Search]
Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & PALS Group. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223-243. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-8805-z [GS Search]
Kluge, S., & Riley, L. (2008). Teaching in virtual worlds: Opportunities and challenges. Setting Knowledge Free: The Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5(5), 127-135. doi: 10.28945/1000 [GS Search]
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, In: Prentice-Hall. [GS Search]
Kolb, A. Y., Kolb, D. A., Passarelli, A., & Sharma, G. (2014). On becoming an experiential educator: The educator role profile. Simulation & gaming, 45(2), 204-234. [GS Search]
Kostarikas, I., Varlamis, I., & Giannakoulopoulos, A. (2011). Blending distance learning platforms and 3D virtual learning environments. 6th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning – November 2011, Loutraki, Greece. [GS Search]
Krassmann, A. L., Tarouco, L. M. R., & Bercht, M. (2021, November). Investigando o Senso de Presença na Educação a Distância. In Anais dos Workshops do X Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (pp. 11-20). SBC. doi: 10.5753/wcbie.2021.217613 [GS Search]
Krassmann, A. L., Mazzuco, A. E. R., Tarouco, L. M. R., & Bercht, M. (2020). A percepção popular da Educação a Distância no Brasil. Tear: Revista de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia, v.9, n.1, 2020. doi: 10.35819/tear.v9.n1.a3928 [GS Search]
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282-297. doi: 10.1162/105474601300343612 [GS Search]
Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A. and Bhogal, R. S. (1997, March) “The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents.” In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 359-366). doi: 10.1145/258549.258797 [GS Search]
Liu, D., Bhagat, K. K., Gao, Y., Chang, T. W., & Huang, R. (2017). The Potentials and Trends of Virtual Reality in Education. In Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education (pp. 105-130). Springer, Singapore. [GS Search]
Makowski, D., Sperduti, M., Nicolas, S. and Piolino, P. (2017). “Being there” and remembering it: Presence improves memory encoding. In Consciousness and cognition, 53, 194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.015[GS Search]
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007 [GS Search]
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 41, 27-29. doi: 10.5926/arepj1962.41.0_27 [GS Search]
Masche, J., & Le, N. T. (2017, June). A Review of Technologies for Conversational Systems. In International Conference on Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Applications (pp. 212-225). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61911-8_19 [GS Search]
McLaughlan, R. G., & Kirkpatrick, D. (2004). Online roleplay: design for active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 477-490. doi: 10.1080/03043790410001716293 [GS Search]
Merchant, Z., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Goetz, E. (2015). Predicting undergraduate students’ acceptance of second life for teaching chemistry. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11(2). [GS Search]
Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e- learning. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1339-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.008 [GS Search]
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and instruction, 19(2), 177-213. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_02 [GS Search]
Olafsson, S., O’Leary, T., & Bickmore, T. (2019, May). Coerced Change-talk with Conversational Agents Promotes Confidence in Behavior Change. In 13th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (pp. 31-40). ACM. doi: 10.1145/3329189.3329202 [GS Search]
O’Neill, D. K., & Sai, T. H. (2014). Why not? Examining college students’ reasons for avoiding an online course. Higher Education, 68(1), 1-14. [GS Search]
Pallavicini, F., Pepe, A., Ferrari, A., Garcea, G., Zanacchi, A., & Mantovani, F. (2020). What Is the Relationship Among Positive Emotions, Sense of Presence, and Ease of Interaction in Virtual Reality Systems? An On-Site Evaluation of a Commercial Virtual Experience. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 27(2), 183-201. doi: 10.1162/pres_a_00325 [GS Search]
Park, H. S. (2015). Comparing student research competencies in online and traditional face-to-face learning environments. In Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(1), 1. [GS Search]
Pellas, N., Kazanidis, I., Konstantinou, N., & Georgiou, G. (2017). Exploring the educational potential of 3D multi-user virtual worlds for STEM education: A mixed-method systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2235-2279. [GS Search]
Porto Bellini, C. G. (2018) “The ABCs of effectiveness in the digital society.” In: Communications of the ACM, 61(7), 84-91. doi: 10.1145/3205945 [GS Search]
Puterbaugh, M. D., Shannon, M., & Gorton, H. (2010). A survey of nurses’ attitudes toward distance education and the educational use of 3D virtual environments. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(4), 292-307. doi: 10.1080/15424065.2010.527243 [GS Search]
Ramírez, J., Rico, M., Riofrío-Luzcando, D., Berrocal-Lobo, M., & de Antonio, A. (2018). Students’ evaluation of a virtual world for procedural training in a tertiary-education course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 23-47. [GS Search]
Riva, G., Davide, F., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2003). Being there: The experience of presence in mediated environments. Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments, 5. [GS Search]
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). What leads people to keep on e- learning? An empirical analysis of users’ experiences and their effects on continuance intention. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1030-1053. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2014.926275 [GS Search]
Schrader, C. (2013). The Relation between Virtual Presence and Learning Outcomes in Serious Games-The Mediating Effect of Motivation. IxD&A, 19, 38-46. [GS Search]
Sjölie, D. (2012). Presence and general principles of brain function. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.004 [GS Search]
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603-616. [GS Search]
Thisgaard, M., & Makransky, G. (2017). Virtual learning simulations in high school: Effects on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes and implications on the development of STEM academic and career choice. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00805 [GS Search]
Wang, Y. F., Petrina, S., & Feng, F. (2017). VILLAGE—Virtual Immersive Language Learning and Gaming Environment: Immersion and presence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 431-450. doi: doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12388 [GS Search]
Witmer, B. G. and Singer, M. J. (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. In Presence, 7(3), 225-240. doi: 10.1162/105474698565686 [GS Search]
Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.001 [GS Search]
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Aliane Loureiro Krassmann, Liane Margarida Rockenbach Tarouco, Magda Bercht
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
