Educational Robotics Applications to Computational Thinking Development in the Context of High School in Full Time

Abstract


Computational Thinking (CT) is an approach that can favor the solving problems skills. In this sense, considering the nowadays problem-solving skills importance, it is necessary to invest in educational practices that encourage the introduction of CT in the experience of students since Basic Education (BE). Computing Education research dedicates efforts to proposing guidelines, instruments and technologies that support the CT introduction in BE school environments. Educational Robotics (ER) is seen as one of these technologies that stands out for promoting skills such as: teamwork, logical reasoning, and creativity; skills closely aligned with the idea of the CT. However, many studies, especially those BE context, do not seek to investigate the ER impact students' skills development, thus evidencing the need for empirical investigations. The main objective of this work is to investigate the impact of ER activities on CT development and subjects learning in High Scholl in full time. For this, we accomplished a study of intervention research type with students and teachers analyzing quantitative and qualitative aspects. The results indicate that the introduction of ER in High Scholl in full time can favor students in the development of the CT skills and in the subjects learning.
Keywords: Educational Robotics, Computational Thinking, High School in Full Time

References

Charoula Angeli and Nicos Valanides. 2020. Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior 105 (2020), 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018


A. L. S. O. Araujo, W. L. Andrade, D. Guerrero, M. Melo, and I. M. L. Souza. 2018. Análise de Rede na Identificação de Habilidades Relacionadas ao Pensamento Computacional. In Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE). SBIE, Fortaleza, CE, BR, 655.


A. L. S. O. Araujo,W. L. Andrade, D. D. S. Guerrero, and M. R. A. Melo. 2019. How Many Abilities CanWe Measure in Computational Thinking?: A Study on Bebras Challenge. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287405


A. L. S. O. Araujo, J. S. Santos, W. L. Andrade, D. D. S. Guerrero, and V. Dagiene. 2017. Exploring computational thinking assessment in introductory programming courses. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190652


P. Blikstein. Acesso em: 06 de Agosto de 2020. O pensamento computacional e a reinvenção do computador na educação. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/YxKxvx (Acesso em: 06 de Agosto de 2020).


V. Chaudhary, V. Agrawal, P. Sureka, and A. Sureka. 2016. An Experience Report on Teaching Programming and Computational Thinking to Elementary Level Children Using Lego Robotics Education Kit. In 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E). IEEE, Mumbai, India, 38–41.


G. Chiazzese, M. Arrigo, A. Chifari, V. Lonati, and C. Tosto. 2018. Exploring the Effect of a Robotics Laboratory on Computational Thinking Skills in Primary School Children Using the Bebras Tasks. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM’18 (2018), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284186


CIEB. 2018. Currículo de Referência em Tecnologia e Computação. In Currículo de Referência em Tecnologia e Computação. Centro de Inovação para a Educação Brasileira, CIEB, São Paulo-SP, 104. http://curriculo.cieb.net.br/assets/docs/ Curriculo_de_Referencia_em_Tecnologia_e_Computacao.pdf


R. Coe. 2002. It’s the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Semantic Scholar 1 (2002).


L. Cohen, K. Morrison, and L. Manion. 2011. Research Methods in Education. IEducation, Research methods. Routledge. n (2011), n.


E. J. F. Costa, L. M. R. S. Campos, and D. D. S. Guerrero. 2017. Computational thinking in mathematics education: A joint approach to encourage problem-solving ability. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190655


V. Dagiene, S. Sentance, and G. Stupurienë—. 2017. Developing a Two- Dimensional Categorization System for Educational Tasks in Informatics. Informatica 28 (01 2017), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2017.119


S. Easterbrook, J. Singer, M. Storey, and D. Damian. 2008. Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Springer, London, 285–311.


E. J. C. Fidelis. 2017. Pensamento computacional na educação básica: uma abordagem para estimular a capacidade de resolução de problemas na matemática. UFCG 1, 156 pages.


GmbH© Fischertechnik. 2018. Fischertechnik. Available in: https://www.fischertechnik.de/en 1 (2018).


A. J. Hirst, J. Johnson, M. Petre, B. A. Price, and M. Richards. 2003. What is the best programming environment/language for teaching robotics using Lego Mindstorms? Artificial Life and Robotics 7, 3 (01 Sep 2003), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481160


R. Maisonnette. 2002. A utilização dos recursos informatizados a partir de uma relação inventiva com a máquina: a robótica educativa. PROINFO-Programa Nacional de Informática na Educação, Curitiba-PR 1 (2002), 35.


T. Palts and M. Pedaste. 2017. Tasks for Assessing Skills of Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Bologna, Italy) (ITiCSE ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 367–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3072999


A. Raabe. 2017. Referenciais de formação em computação: Educação básica. In Workshop sobre Educação em Computação, Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC). SBC, Porto Alegre - RS, n.


R. S. Rodrigues,W. L. Andrade, and L. M. R. S. Campos. 2016. Can Computational Thinking help me? A quantitative study of its effects on education. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, Eire, PA, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757409


C. Rogers and M. Portsmore. 2004. Bringing Engineering to Elementary School. In Journal of STEM Education : Innovations and Research; Auburn, Vol. 5. Semantic Scholar, USA, 17–28. https://search.proquest.com/docview/222795467? accountid=146818


C. Schons, E. Primaz, and G. A. P. Wirth. 2004. Introdução a robótica educativa na instituição escolar para alunos do ensino fundamental da disciplina de língua espanhola através das novas tecnologias de aprendizagem. In Anais do IWorkshop de Computação da Região Sul, Vol. 1. SBC, Porto Alegre - RS, 11.


P. Seymour. 1986. LOGO: Computadores e Educação. Brasiliense (1986).


I. M. L. Souza, W. L. Andrade, L. M. R Sampaio, and A. L. S. O Araujo. 2018. A Systematic Review on the use of LEGOtextsuperscript® Robotics in Education. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (2018), 1–9.


I. M. L. Souza, R. S. Rodrigues, and W. L. Andrade. 2016. Explorando Robótica com Pensamento Computacional no Ensino Médio: Um estudo sobre seus efeitos na educação. In XXVII Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação - SBIE). SBC, Uberlândia- MG, 490–499.


Charles Spearman. 2008. Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. In The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. Springer, New York, NY, 502–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32833-1_379


J. M. Wing. 2006. Computational Thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (March 2006), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215


Education for Life ZOOM. 2010. ZOOM Education for Life, In Zoom for Education. Available in: http://zoom.education, n.
Published
2021-04-26
SOUZA, Isabelle Maria Lima de; ANDRADE, Wilkerson L. de Andrade; SAMPAIO, Livia S. Campos. Educational Robotics Applications to Computational Thinking Development in the Context of High School in Full Time. In: BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTING EDUCATION (EDUCOMP), 1. , 2021, On-line. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2021 . p. 44-54. ISSN 3086-0733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/educomp.2021.14470.