Avaliação de Risco em um Laboratório Remoto IoT
Abstract
The use of remote laboratories is an alternative to maintain practical activities in laboratory disciplines, even in the remote offering caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in addition to the adoption of various tools for remote work and study, during the period of social distancing, a growing concern with security was observed. In this article, a risk assessment for improving the security of a remote laboratory used in offering a digital electronics laboratory course between September and December 2021 is presented, resulting in a specification using MQTT instead of the HTTP protocol.References
Aloul, F., Zualkernan, I., Shapsough, S., and Towheed, M. (2020). A monitoring and control gateway for iot edge devices in smart home. In 2020 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pages 696–701. IEEE.
Dash, M., Bhusan, P. B., and Samal, S. (2014). Determinants of customers’ adoption of mobile banking: An empirical study by integrating diffusion of innovation with attitude. Journal of Internet Banking and commerce, 19(3):1–21.
Models, P. (2009). Diffusion of innovations.
Pálka, L. and Schauer, F. (2015). Safety of communication and neural networks for security enhancement in data warehouse for remote laboratories and laboratory management system. In 2015 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pages 1–8. IEEE.
Sandescu, C., Grigorescu, O., Rughinis¸, R., Deaconescu, R., and Calin, M. (2018). Why iot security is failing. the need of a test driven security approach. In 2018 17th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), pages 1–6. IEEE.
Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., and Chang, V. (2018). A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-ofthings environments. Computers & Security, 74:340–354.
Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M., and Baalsrud-Hauge, J. (2021). Guideline to safety and security in federated remote labs. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(4).
Dash, M., Bhusan, P. B., and Samal, S. (2014). Determinants of customers’ adoption of mobile banking: An empirical study by integrating diffusion of innovation with attitude. Journal of Internet Banking and commerce, 19(3):1–21.
Models, P. (2009). Diffusion of innovations.
Pálka, L. and Schauer, F. (2015). Safety of communication and neural networks for security enhancement in data warehouse for remote laboratories and laboratory management system. In 2015 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pages 1–8. IEEE.
Sandescu, C., Grigorescu, O., Rughinis¸, R., Deaconescu, R., and Calin, M. (2018). Why iot security is failing. the need of a test driven security approach. In 2018 17th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), pages 1–6. IEEE.
Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., and Chang, V. (2018). A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-ofthings environments. Computers & Security, 74:340–354.
Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M., and Baalsrud-Hauge, J. (2021). Guideline to safety and security in federated remote labs. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(4).
Published
2021-10-27
How to Cite
HAYASHI, Victor T.; ALMEIDA, Felipe V. de; KOMO, Andrea E..
Avaliação de Risco em um Laboratório Remoto IoT. In: REGIONAL SCHOOL OF COMPUTER NETWORKS (ERRC), 19. , 2021, Charqueadas/RS.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2021
.
p. 97-102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/errc.2021.18549.
