Avaliação de Risco em um Laboratório Remoto IoT
Resumo
O uso de laboratórios remotos é uma alternativa para manter as atividades práticas em disciplinas de laboratório, mesmo no oferecimento remoto provocado pela pandemia de COVID-19. Contudo, além da adoção de diversas ferramentas para trabalho e estudo remoto, durante o período de distanciamento social foi observado uma preocupação crescente com a segurança. Neste artigo, é apresentada uma avaliação de risco para melhoria da segurança de um laboratório remoto utilizado no oferecimento de uma disciplina de laboratório de eletrônica digital entre setembro e dezembro de 2021, resultando em uma especificação que utiliza MQTT ao invés do protocolo HTTP.Referências
Aloul, F., Zualkernan, I., Shapsough, S., and Towheed, M. (2020). A monitoring and control gateway for iot edge devices in smart home. In 2020 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pages 696–701. IEEE.
Dash, M., Bhusan, P. B., and Samal, S. (2014). Determinants of customers’ adoption of mobile banking: An empirical study by integrating diffusion of innovation with attitude. Journal of Internet Banking and commerce, 19(3):1–21.
Models, P. (2009). Diffusion of innovations.
Pálka, L. and Schauer, F. (2015). Safety of communication and neural networks for security enhancement in data warehouse for remote laboratories and laboratory management system. In 2015 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pages 1–8. IEEE.
Sandescu, C., Grigorescu, O., Rughinis¸, R., Deaconescu, R., and Calin, M. (2018). Why iot security is failing. the need of a test driven security approach. In 2018 17th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), pages 1–6. IEEE.
Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., and Chang, V. (2018). A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-ofthings environments. Computers & Security, 74:340–354.
Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M., and Baalsrud-Hauge, J. (2021). Guideline to safety and security in federated remote labs. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(4).
Dash, M., Bhusan, P. B., and Samal, S. (2014). Determinants of customers’ adoption of mobile banking: An empirical study by integrating diffusion of innovation with attitude. Journal of Internet Banking and commerce, 19(3):1–21.
Models, P. (2009). Diffusion of innovations.
Pálka, L. and Schauer, F. (2015). Safety of communication and neural networks for security enhancement in data warehouse for remote laboratories and laboratory management system. In 2015 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pages 1–8. IEEE.
Sandescu, C., Grigorescu, O., Rughinis¸, R., Deaconescu, R., and Calin, M. (2018). Why iot security is failing. the need of a test driven security approach. In 2018 17th RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet), pages 1–6. IEEE.
Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., and Chang, V. (2018). A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-ofthings environments. Computers & Security, 74:340–354.
Uckelmann, D., Mezzogori, D., Esposito, G., Neroni, M., Reverberi, D., Ustenko, M., and Baalsrud-Hauge, J. (2021). Guideline to safety and security in federated remote labs. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 17(4).
Publicado
27/10/2021
Como Citar
HAYASHI, Victor T.; ALMEIDA, Felipe V. de; KOMO, Andrea E..
Avaliação de Risco em um Laboratório Remoto IoT. In: ESCOLA REGIONAL DE REDES DE COMPUTADORES (ERRC), 19. , 2021, Charqueadas/RS.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2021
.
p. 97-102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/errc.2021.18549.
