Desafios e Tendências na Predição de Sepse
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the main causes of death in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and has high costs for health systems worldwide. Therefore, it is important to discover the challenges and trends on this topic to contribute to future research. This work presents a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) in which articles were analyzed within the range of 2016 to 2020 with a focus on sepsis prediction. The results showed, in addition to other evidences, that the diversity of sepsis prediction models found reveals a clear need for standardization in this area.
References
Chiew, Calvin J., et al. "Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department." Medicine 98.6 (2019).
Zabihi, Morteza, Serkan Kiranyaz, and Moncef Gabbouj. "Sepsis prediction in intensive care unit using ensemble of XGboost models." 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). IEEE, 2019.
Abromavičius, Vytautas, et al. "Two-stage monitoring of patients in intensive care unit for sepsis prediction using non-overfitted machine learning models." Electronics 9.7 (2020): 1133. Wickramaratne,
Saqib, Mohammed, Ying Sha, and May D. Wang. "Early prediction of sepsis in EMR records using traditional ML techniques and deep learning LSTM networks." 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2018.
Sajila D., and MD Shaad Mahmud. "Bi-directional gated recurrent unit based ensemble model for the early detection of sepsis." 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2020.
Petersen, Kai, Sairam Vakkalanka, and Ludwik Kuzniarz. "Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update." Information and software technology 64 (2015): 1-18.
Yan, Melissa Y., Lise Tuset Gustad, and Øystein Nytrø. "Sepsis prediction, early detection, and identification using clinical text for machine learning: a systematic review." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 29.3 (2022): 559-575.
Moor, Michael, et al. "Early prediction of sepsis in the ICU using machine learning: a systematic review." Frontiers in medicine 8 (2021): 348.
Schünemann, Holger, et al. "Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach." Updated October 2013 (2013).
Whiting, Penny F., et al. "QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies." Annals of internal medicine 155.8 (2011): 529-536.
Fleuren, Lucas M., et al. "Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy." Intensive care medicine 46.3 (2020): 383-400.
Moher, David, et al. "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement." Annals of internal medicine 151.4 (2009): 264-269.
Kitchenham, Barbara Ann, David Budgen, and Pearl Brereton. Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews. Vol. 4. CRC press, 2015.
Stern, Cindy, Zoe Jordan, and Alexa McArthur. "Developing the review question and inclusion criteria." AJN The American Journal of Nursing 114.4 (2014): 53-56.
Da Silva, Martony Demes et al. Levantamento bibliográfico utilizando a ferramenta The End. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2020.
Carletta J. Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic. Computational linguistics. 1996; 22(2):249–254.
Honoré, Antoine et al. Hidden Markov Models for sepsis detection in preterm infants. In: ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2020. p. 1130-1134.
Goldberg, Ori et al. Can we improve early identification of neonatal late-onset sepsis? A validated prediction model. Journal of Perinatology, v. 40, n. 9, p. 1315-1322, 2020.
Thakur, Jyoti; PAHUJA, Sharvan Kumar; PAHUJA, Roop. Performance comparison of systemic inflammatory response syndrome with logistic regression models to predict sepsis in neonates. Children, v. 4, n. 12, p. 111, 2017.
Lin, Chen et al. Early diagnosis and prediction of sepsis shock by combining static and dynamic information using convolutional-LSTM. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). IEEE, 2018. p. 219-228.
Norrie, John. The challenge of implementing AI models in the ICU. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, v. 6, n. 12, p. 886-888, 2018.
Wang, Fei; KAUSHAL, Rainu; KHULLAR, Dhruv. Should health care demand interpretable artificial intelligence or accept “black box” medicine?. Annals of internal medicine, v. 172, n. 1, p. 59-60, 2020.
Calvert, Jacob S. et al. A computational approach to early sepsis detection. Computers in biology and medicine, v. 74, p. 69-73, 2016.
Nemati, Shamim et al. An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Critical care medicine, v. 46, n. 4, p. 547, 2018.
Li, Xiang et al. A time-phased machine learning model for real-time prediction of sepsis in critical care. Critical Care Medicine, v. 48, n. 10, p. e884-e888, 2020.
Goldberger, Ary L. et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. circulation, v. 101, n. 23, p.
e215-e220, 2000. Pierrakos, Charalampos; VINCENT, Jean-Louis. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical care, v. 14, p. 1-18, 2010.
Reyna, Matthew A., et al. "Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019." 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). IEEE, 2019.
Johnson, Alistair EW, et al. "MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database." Scientific data 3.1 (2016): 1-9.
Johnson, Alistair, et al. "Mimic-iv (version 0.4)." PhysioNet (2020).
Machado, Flávia Ribeiro, et al. "Chegando a um consenso: vantagens e desvantagens do Sepsis 3 considerando países de recursos limitados." Revista brasileira de terapia intensiva 28 (2016): 361-365.
Macias, E. et al. Novel imputing method and deep learning techniques for early prediction of sepsis in intensive care units. In: 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). IEEE, 2019. p. 1-4.
