A Survey of the Determinants of Innovation in Educational Software

• Rafael Santos Barbosa Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE)
• Ricardo André Cavalcante de Souza Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2018.437

Abstract

Several studies report that innovative teaching-learning processes are usually aided by technology, especially using software. The identification of innovation drivers for software-supported education can be used to better guide the development, evaluation and selection of software for this purpose. This work then presents the result of a literature systematic mapping considering studies related to innovation factors in software aimed at education. From the set of 146 studies analyzed, 17 of these were selected because they were more relevant to the researched topic.

Keywords: innovation, education, educational software, drivers of innovation, systematic mapping

References

Andersson, M.; Lindgren, R.; Henfridsson, O. (2008) Architectural knowledge in interorganizational IT innovation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v.17, n.1, p.19–38.

Arksey, H. e O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1):19–32.

Bennet, R. (2001) How the Internet will Help Large-Scale Assessment Reinvent Itself. Education Policy Analysis, v.9, n.5.

Cardoso, A. P. (2003) A receptividade à mudança e à inovação pedagógica: o professor e o contexto escolar. Perspectivas actuais/ Educação. Porto: Edições Asa.

Kenski, V. M. (2015) A urgência de propostas inovadoras para a formação de professores para todos os níveis de ensino. Rev. Diálogo Educ., v.15, n.45, p.423–441, maio/ago.

Kitchenham, B. (2004) Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Technical Report TR/SE-0401, Keele University and NICTA.

Kitchenham, B. (2006). Empirical paradigm - the role of experiments. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Empirical Software Engineering Issues: Critical Assessment and Future Directions, pages 25–32. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Kotler, P.; Armstrong, G. (2010) Principles of Marketing. [S.l.]: Prentice Hall International.

Looney, J. W. (2009) Assessment and Innovation in Education. OECD Education Working Papers. [S.l.]: OECD Publishing.

Luna, A. J. D. O.; Kruchten, P.; Pedrosa, M. L. D. E.; Neto, H. R.; de Moura, H. P. (2014). State of the art of agile governance: a systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1922.

Magalhães, C. V.; Santos, R. E.; Da Silva, F. Q.; Gomes, A. S. (2013). Caracterizando a pesquisa em informática na educação no Brasil: um mapeamento sistemático das publicações do SBIE. Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação - SBIE, Vol.24(1), p.22.

Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Disponível em: [link]. Acesso em: dez. 2016.

Mortensen, P. S.; Bloch, C. W. (2005). Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

OECD (2014) Measuring Innovation in Education: A New Perspective. Educational Research and Innovation. [S.l.]: OECD Publishing.

Petersen, K.; Feldt, R.; Mujtaba, S.; Mattsson, M. (2008) Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). University of Bari, Italy.

Zaugg, H.; West, R. E.; Tateishi, I.; Randall, D. L. (2011). Mendeley: Creating communities of scholarly inquiry through research collaboration. TechTrends, 55(1), 32–36.