Agentes pedagógicos y su multiplicidad de roles

• Alberto A. Piedrahita Ospina Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM) / Universidade Nacional da Colômbia (UNAL)
• Julián Moreno Cadavid Universidade Nacional da Colômbia (UNAL)
• Néstor D. Duque Méndez Universidade Nacional da Colômbia (UNAL)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2018.1926

Resumo

Los agentes pedagógicos surgen como una alternativa, generalmente asociada a los sistemas tutoriales inteligentes, para proveer una interacción más “natural” con los estudiantes dentro de un ambiente virtual de aprendizaje. Para ello, tales agentes pueden llevar a cabo diversos roles dependiendo de su abordaje pedagógico, siendo el objetivo de este trabajo presentar una clasificación clara de los mismos, la cual parte de la descripción de sus características y las funciones que llevan a cabo. Por último, y a manera de ejemplo, se discriminan varios de agentes pedagógicos más referenciados en la literatura de acuerdo a tal clasificación.

Palavras-chave: agentes pedagógicos, interacción natural, entorno virtual de aprendizaje, sistemas tutoriales inteligentes, clasificación de agentes

Referências

Aimeur, E., & Frasson, C. (1996). Analyzing a new learning strategy according to different knowledge levels. Computers & Education, 27(2), 115–127. DOI: 10.1016/0360-1315(96)00018-8

Baylor, A. L. (2011). The design of motivational agents and avatars. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 291–300.

Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (2001). Extending Intelligent Learning Environments with Teachable Agents to Enhance Learning. En Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 389–397).

Chan, T.-W., & Baskin, A. B. (1990). Learning Companion Systems, 26.

Chou, C.-Y., Chan, T.-W., & Lin, C.-J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present, and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40(3), 255–269.

Chou, T. W., & Chan, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the Design of Computer Supports for Reciprocal Tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 1–24.

Frozza, R., da Silva, A. K., Lux, B., da Cruz, M. E. K., & Borin, M. (2009). Dóris 3D: Agente pedagógico basado en emociones. En Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE) (Vol. 1).

Giraffa, L. M. M. (1999). Uma arquitetura de tutor utilizando estados mentais. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.

Hietala, P., & Niemirepo, T. (1998). The Competence of Learning Companion Agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 9, 178–192.

Jaques, P. A. (2004). Using an animated pedagogical agent to interact affectively with the student. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223–243.

Kim, Y., Thayne, J., & Wei, Q. (2017). An embodied agent helps anxious students in mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 219–235.

Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., & Bhogal, R. S. (1997). The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. En Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 359–366). ACM.

Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Plant, E. A., Doerr, C. E., & Baylor, A. L. (2010). The influence of computer-based model’s race and gender on female students’ attitudes and beliefs towards engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 35–44.

Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of educational research, 57(2), 149–174.

Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. London: Academic Press. Recuperado a partir de [link]