ProEvaluator: A Tool for Evaluating Software Processes
Abstract
In December 2003, SOFTEX (Association for Promoting Brazilian Software Excellence) launched the MPS.BR (the Model for Brazilian Software Process Improvement). The MA-MPS (MPS.BR Evaluation Method) was created to check if the organizations meet the requirements of such model. This paper presents a tool to support the activities described in the MA-MPS method. The tool allows the record of the process execution evidences, the attribution of concepts to the process expected results and, from that point, calculates automatically the maturity level of the organization and releases a final report with the evaluation results.
Keywords:
ProEvaluator, Evaluation, Software Processes
References
Appraisal Requirements for CMMI (2001), Version 1.1 (ARC, V1.1), Pittsburgh, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
ASSOCIAÇÃO PARA PROMOÇÃO DA EXCELÊNCIA DO SOFTWARE BRASILEIRO – SOFTEX. MPS.BR (2006), “Guia Geral”, versão 1.1. Disponível em: www.softex.br.
ASSOCIAÇÃO PARA PROMOÇÃO DA EXCELÊNCIA DO SOFTWARE BRASILEIRO – SOFTEX. MPS.BR (2006), “Guia de Avaliação”, versão 1.0. Disponível em: www.softex.br.
Capability Maturity Model Integration (2002), Version 1.1 CMMI for Software Engineering (CMMI-SW, V1.1), Pittsburgh, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
Capability Maturity Model for Software (1993), Version 1.1, Pittsburg, Software Engineering Institute, Carnigie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
Fabbrini, F., Fantini, E., Fusani, M., Lami, G. (2003), "Performing SPICE Assessments: Yet Another Tool". In Joint ESA - 3rd International SPICE Conference on Process Assessment and Improvement 17-21 ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Galotta, C., Oliveira, K., Rocha, A.R. (2004), “Apoio a Interação entre Processos de Negócio e de Software através de Gerência do Conhecimento”, Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software, Brasília-DF, Brasil.
Hunter, R., Robinson, G., Woodman, I. (1997), “Tool Support for Software Process Assessment and Improvement”. University of Strathclyde, Department of Computer Science. Disponível em: https://www.interscience.wily.com
Muradas, F.M. (2006), “Processo de Avaliação MPS.BR: Definição e Ambiente de Apoio”, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
NBR/ISO 9000 (2000), “Sistema de Gestão da Qualidade – Fundamentos e Vocabulário”, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement – SCAMPI (2002), Version 1.1, Method Implementation Guidance for Government Source and Contract Process Monitoring, Pittsburgh, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 15504-5: Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model, Geneve: ISO, 2006.
The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission (1995). ISO/IEC 12207 Information technology – Software life cycle processes, Geneve: ISO.
Walker, A.J., Lok, H.R. (1995), “SPICE Assessments using the SEAL assessment tool”, Software Engineering Applications Laboratory.
ASSOCIAÇÃO PARA PROMOÇÃO DA EXCELÊNCIA DO SOFTWARE BRASILEIRO – SOFTEX. MPS.BR (2006), “Guia Geral”, versão 1.1. Disponível em: www.softex.br.
ASSOCIAÇÃO PARA PROMOÇÃO DA EXCELÊNCIA DO SOFTWARE BRASILEIRO – SOFTEX. MPS.BR (2006), “Guia de Avaliação”, versão 1.0. Disponível em: www.softex.br.
Capability Maturity Model Integration (2002), Version 1.1 CMMI for Software Engineering (CMMI-SW, V1.1), Pittsburgh, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
Capability Maturity Model for Software (1993), Version 1.1, Pittsburg, Software Engineering Institute, Carnigie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
Fabbrini, F., Fantini, E., Fusani, M., Lami, G. (2003), "Performing SPICE Assessments: Yet Another Tool". In Joint ESA - 3rd International SPICE Conference on Process Assessment and Improvement 17-21 ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Galotta, C., Oliveira, K., Rocha, A.R. (2004), “Apoio a Interação entre Processos de Negócio e de Software através de Gerência do Conhecimento”, Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software, Brasília-DF, Brasil.
Hunter, R., Robinson, G., Woodman, I. (1997), “Tool Support for Software Process Assessment and Improvement”. University of Strathclyde, Department of Computer Science. Disponível em: https://www.interscience.wily.com
Muradas, F.M. (2006), “Processo de Avaliação MPS.BR: Definição e Ambiente de Apoio”, COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro.
NBR/ISO 9000 (2000), “Sistema de Gestão da Qualidade – Fundamentos e Vocabulário”, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement – SCAMPI (2002), Version 1.1, Method Implementation Guidance for Government Source and Contract Process Monitoring, Pittsburgh, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Disponível em: http://www.sei.cmu.edu
The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 15504-5: Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model, Geneve: ISO, 2006.
The International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission (1995). ISO/IEC 12207 Information technology – Software life cycle processes, Geneve: ISO.
Walker, A.J., Lok, H.R. (1995), “SPICE Assessments using the SEAL assessment tool”, Software Engineering Applications Laboratory.
Published
2008-06-02
How to Cite
XAVIER, Juliana Moura Cavalcanti; VASCONCELOS, Alexandre Marcos Lind de.
ProEvaluator: A Tool for Evaluating Software Processes. In: BRAZILIAN SOFTWARE QUALITY SYMPOSIUM (SBQS), 7. , 2008, Florianópolis.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2008
.
p. 201-213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2008.15544.
