Avaliação da Performance de Estratégias de Decisão de Mobilidade MADM na Perspectiva da Eficiência de QoE
Abstract
The state of the art in MADM quality-oriented mobility management evaluation only address network-/packet-level Quality of Service (QoS) measures. Therefore, this work fills this gap through a broad review of the MADM methods applied to the quality-oriented mobility decision process, as well as a user-centric Quality of Experience (QoE) assessment of these algorithms about our previous work: the Extended Elitism for Best Selection (E2BS). The QoE evaluation is conducted leveraging the flexibility of the Software-Defined Mobile Networking (SDMN) paradigm. The QoE analysis outcomes demonstrate that E2BS outperforms the selected MADM-based methods, by improving the overall QoE perceived by mobile users when consuming multimedia mobile flows.
References
Fontes, R., Afzal, S., Brito, S., Santos, M., and Rothenberg, C. (2015). Mininet-WiFi: Emulating software-dened wireless networks. In 2015 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), pages pp. 384–389.
Golmie, N. (2009). Seamless mobility: are we there yet? IEEE Wireless Communications, 16(4):12–13.
Golmie, N., Melia, T., Bajko, G., Das, S., and Zú˜niga, J.-C. (2009). IEEE 802.21 Mobility Services Framework Design (MSFD). RFC 5677.
Group, I. . W. et al. (1999). Part11: Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specications. ANSI/IEEE Std. 802.11.
Gupta, A. and Jha, R. K. (2015). A survey of 5g network: Architecture and emerging technologies. IEEE Access, 3:1206–1232.
IEEE Std 802.11e-2005 (2005). IEEE standard for information technology–local and metropolitan area networks–specic requirements–part 11: Wireless lan medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specications amendment 8: Medium access control (mac) quality of service enhancements. IEEE Std 802.11e (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11, 1999 Edition (Reaff 2003), pages 1–212.
Klaue, J., Rathke, B., and Wolisz, A. (2003). Evalvid – a framework for video transmission and quality evaluation. In 13th Int. Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools (TOOLS 2003), pages pp. 255–272.
Lahby, M., Cherkaoui, L., and Adib, A. (2013). A novel ranking algorithm based network selection for heterogeneous wireless access. JNW, 8(2):263–272.
Liyanage, M., Gurtov, A., and Ylianttila, M. (2015). SDMN, pages 440–. Wiley Telecom.
Martinez-Morales, J. D., Pineda-Rico, U., and Stevens-Navarro, E. (2010). Performance comparison between madm algorithms for vertical handoff in 4g networks. In Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), 2010, pages 309– 314. IEEE.
McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., and Turner, J. (2008). OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 38(2):pp. 69–74.
Obayiuwana, E. and Falowo, O. E. (2017). Network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks using multi-criteria decision-making algorithms: a review. Wireless Networks, 23(8):2617–2649.
Silva, F., Castillo-Lema, J., Neto, A., Silva, F., Rosa, P., Corujo, D., Guimarães, C., and Aguiar, R. (2014). Entity title architecture extensions towards advanced qualityoriented mobility control capabilities. In Computers and Communication (ISCC), 2014 IEEE Symposium on, pages 1–6. IEEE.
Silva, F. S. D., Neto, A. V., Maciel, D., Castillo-Lema, J., Silva, F., Frosi, P., and Cerqueira, E. (2016). An innovative software-dened winemo architecture for advanced qos-guaranteed mobile service transport. Computer Networks, 107:270–291.
Yoon, P. K., Hwang, C.-L., and Yoon, K. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Sage Pubn Inc.
Zekri, M., Jouaber, B., and Zeghlache, D. (2012). A review on mobility management and vertical handover solutions over heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Communications, 35(17):2055–2068.
