Autocura para Redes Definidas por Software
Resumo
O advento de redes definidas por software e virtualização de funções de rede trouxe inúmeras vantagens; contudo, para atingir a flexibilidade e a programabilidade previstas nessas tecnologias, novos componentes nos planos de controle e gerenciamento foram introduzidos. Tais componentes requerem recuperação rápida pois, sem gerenciamento, todo o plano de dados fica inoperável. Para lidar com falhas nesses planos, recorre-se à técnica de autocura, explorada na tese que é resumida neste documento. Os resultados provam a eficácia de autocura em fatias de rede com rigorosos requisitos de qualidade e, também, demonstram que o framework introduzido é capaz de autocurar, ou seja, curar o ambiente degradado bem como curar a si mesmo.
Referências
3GPP (2018b). Telecommunication management; Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Self-healing concepts and requirements. Technical Specification (TS) 32.541, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
3GPP (2018c). Telecommunication management;Study on management and orchestration of network slicing for next generation network. Technical Report (TR) 28.801, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Version 15.1.0.
Abdelsalam, M. A. (2018). Network Application Design Challenges and Solutions in SDN. PhD thesis, Carleton University.
Afolabi, I., Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Ksentini, A., and Flinck, H. (2018). Network slicing and softwarization: A survey on principles, enabling technologies, and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 20(3):2429–2453.
Azab, M. and Fortes, J. A. B. (2017). Towards proactive sdn-controller attack and failure resilience. In 2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), pages 442–448.
Barona López, L., Valdivieso Caraguay, Á., Sotelo Monge, M., and García Villalba, L. (2017). Key technologies in the context of future networks: operational and management requirements. Future Internet, 9(1):1.
Chandrasekaran, B., Tschaen, B., and Benson, T. (2016). Isolating and tolerating sdn application failures with legosdn. In Proceedings of the Symposium on SDN Research, SOSR ’16, pages 7:1–7:12, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Cox, J. H., Chung, J., Donovan, S., Ivey, J., Clark, R. J., Riley, G., and Owen, H. L. (2017). Advancing software-defined networks: A survey. IEEE Access, 5:25487–25526.
d. R. Fonseca, P. C. and Mota, E. S. (2017). A survey on fault management in software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 19(4):2284–2321.
Ganek, A. G. and Corbi, T. A. (2003). The dawning of the autonomic computing era. IBM systems Journal, 42(1):5–18.
Mizrahi, T., Sprecher, N., Bellagamba, E., and Weingarten, Y. (2014). An Overview of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Tools. RFC 7276.
Ramirez-Perez, C. and Ramos, V. (2016). Sdn meets sdr in self-organizing networks: fitting the pieces of network management. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(1):48–57.
Rehman, A. U., Aguiar, R. L., and Barraca, J. P. (2019). Fault-tolerance in the scope of software-defined networking (sdn). IEEE Access, 7:124474–124490.
Souza Neto, N. V. d. (2021). Autocura para redes definidas por software. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia.