Amazon Biobank - A community-based genetic database
Resumo
In regions like the Amazon Rainforest, there is much unexplored biodiversity data that could potentially be used to promote innovative biotechnology developments. Building a biobank with such genetic data is, however, a challenge. One reason is that existing repositories (e.g., NCBI) lack clear incentives for collaboration. Aiming to tackle this issue, and promote a biodiversity-based economy in the Amazon region, in this work we present a prototype for the Amazon Biobank, a community-based genetic database. Leveraging blockchain, smart contracts, and peer-to-peer technologies, we build a collaborative and highly scalable repository. It also enables monetary incentives for users who insert, store, process, validate and share DNA data.
Referências
Beimel, A. (2011). Secret-sharing schemes: A survey. In Coding and Cryptology, pages 11–46, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer.
Buck, M. and Hamilton, C. (2011). The nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benets arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity. Review of ECIEL, 20(1):47–61.
Cardoso, D., Särkinen, T., Alexander, S., Amorim, A. M., Bittrich, V., Celis, M., Daly, D. C., Fiaschi, P., Funk, V. A., Giacomin, L. L., et al. (2017). Amazon plant diversity revealed by a taxonomically veried species list. Proc. of NAS, 114(40):10695–10700.
Cohen, B. (2003). Incentives build robustness in bittorrent. In Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer systems, volume 6, pages 68–72. Berkeley, CA, USA.
Dhillon, V., Metcalf, D., and Hooper, M. (2017). The Hyperledger project. In Blockchain enabled applications, pages 139–149. Springer.
Encrypgen (2021). https://encrypgen.com/. Accessed in 29-06-2021.
Grishin, D., Obbad, K., Estep, P., Quinn, K., Zaranek, S., Zaranek, A., Vandewege, W., Clegg, T., César, N., Cifric, M., and Church, G. (2018). Accelerating genomic data generation and facilitating genomic data access using decentralization, privacypreserving technologies and equitable compensation. Blockchain in Healthcare Today.
Kimura, L., Andrade, E., Carvalho, T., and Simplicio, M. (2021). Amazon Biobank: sustainable development built upon rainforest’s biodiversity. In Planetary Health Annual Meeting and Festival. https://bit.ly/3eyLht9.
Lokko, Y., Heijde, M., Schebesta, K., Scholtés, P., Van Montagu, M., and Giacca, M. (2018). Biotechnology and the bioeconomy-towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. New biotechnology, 40:5–10.
Micali, S. and Rivest, R. L. (2002). Micropayments revisited. In Cryptographers’ Track at the RSA Conference, pages 149–163. Springer.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, page 21260.
NCBI (2021). GenBank and WGS Statistics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/statistics. Accessed on 29-06-2021.
Ozercan, H. I., Ileri, A. M., Ayday, E., and Alkan, C. (2018). Realizing the potential of blockchain technologies in genomics. Genome Research, 28(9):1255–1263.
Pearce, D. W. and Moran, D. (1994). The economic value of biodiversity. Earthscan.
Soetaert, W. and Vandamme, E. (2006). The impact of industrial biotechnology. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology, 1(7-8):756–769.
Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Thiebes, S., Kannengießer, N., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., and Sunyaev, A. (2020). Beyond Data Markets: Opportunities and Challenges for Distributed Ledger Technology in Genomics. Proc. of the 53rd Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, 3:3275–3284.
UNDP (2021). A pilot to improve genetic resources traceability through blockchain technology launched by the UNDP GEF Global ABS project. https://bit.ly/3hnMqEh. Acessed on 29-06-2021.
Xinxing, Z., Zhihong, T., and Luchen, Z. (2016). A measurement study on mainline DHT and magnet link. In IEEE 1st Int. Conf. on Data Science in Cyberspace, pages 11–19.