O que Acontece após um Hackathon? Um Estudo Empírico
Resumo
Hackathons são eventos de curta duração onde seus participantes trabalham para desenvolver um software em até 48 horas. Apesar da rica literatura existente sobre este tema, ainda existem poucos estudos direcionados ao que acontece após esses eventos. Desta forma, este trabalho tem como objetivo investigar questões relacionadas ao chamado pós-hackathon o que inclui os projetos desenvolvidos durante os mesmos, as tecnologias experimentadas e os contatos estabelecidos durante o hackathon. Para alcançar esse objetivo, enviamos um questionário para os participantes de seis hackathons que ocorreram entre os anos de 2018 e 2019. Este artigo descreve os resultados da análise de dados deste questionário.
Palavras-chave:
Hackathons, Estudo Empírico, Análise de Dados
Referências
Startup weekend faq.
Gama, K. (2017a). Crowdsourced software development in civic apps - mo- tivations of civic hackathons participants. pages 550–555.
Gama,K.(2017b).Preliminaryfindingsonsoftwareengineeringpracticesin civic hackathons. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE), pages 14–20.
Gama, K., Alencar Gonc ̧alves, B., and Alessio, P. (2018). Hackathons in the formal learning process. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, pages 248–253, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Hartmann, S., Mainka, A., and Stock, W. G. (2019). Innovation contests: How to engage citizens in solving urban problems? In Civic Engagement and Politics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pages 58–77. IGI Global.
Hou, Y. and Wang, D. (2017). Hacking with npos: Collaborative analytics and broker roles in civic data hackathons. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Inte- ract., 1(CSCW):53:1–53:16.
Komssi, M., Pichlis, D., Raatikainen, M., Kindstro ̈m, K., and Ja ̈rvinen, J. (2015). What are hackathons for? IEEE Software, 32(5):60–67.
Leite, T. H. S., Filho, F. F., de Almeida Melo, L., de Souza, C. R. B., and da Silva Junior, F. F. (2019). Fatores que influenciam na continuidade da colaboração entre equipes de projetos desenvolvidos em eventos de curta duração. In Anais do XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos, pages80–85, PortoAlegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Matheus, R., Maia Ribeiro, M., and Vaz, J. (2015). Brazil towards government 2.0: Strategies for adopting open government data in national and subna- tional governments. pages 121–138.
Melo, L. d. A., da Silva Junior, F. F., Leite, T. H. d. S., Filho, F. F., and de Souza, C. R. B. (2018). Going beyond the challenge! investigating the aspects that attract people to participate in hackathons. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC 2018, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Nandi, A. and Mandernach, M. (2016). Hackathons as an informal learning platform. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, SIGCSE ’16, pages 346–351, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Nolte, A., Pe-Than, E. P. P., Filippova, A., Bird, C., Scallen, S., and Herbsleb, J. D. (2018). You hacked and now what?: - exploring outcomes of a corpo- rate hackathon. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 2(CSCW):129:1–129:23.
Pe-Than, E. P. P., Nolte, A., Filippova, A., Bird, C., Scallen, S., and Herbsleb, J. D. (2019). Designing corporate hackathons with a purpose: The future of software development. IEEE Softw., 36(1):15–22.
Safarov, I., Meijer, A., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22:1–24.
Sakhumuzi, M. and Emmanuel, O. (2017). Student per- ception of the contribution of hackathon and collaborative learning approach on com- puter programming pass rate. In 2017 Conference on Information Communication Technology and Society (ICTAS), pages 1–5.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Rese- arch: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
Trainer, E. H., Kalyanasundaram, A., Chaihirunkarn, C., and Herbsleb, J. D. (2016). How to hackathon: Socio-technical tradeoffs in brief, intensive colloca- tion. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing, CSCW ’16, page 1118–1130, New York, NY, USA. Associ- ation for Computing Machinery.
Valença, G.,Lacerda,N.,Rebelo,M.E.,Alves,C.,anddeSouza,C.R. (2019). On the benefits of corporate hackathons for software ecosystems–a systematic mapping study. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pages 367–382. Springer.
Warner, J. and Guo, P. J. (2017). Hack.edu: Examining how college hackathons are perceived by student attendees and non-attendees. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER ’17, pages 254–262, New York, NY, USA. ACM
Gama, K. (2017a). Crowdsourced software development in civic apps - mo- tivations of civic hackathons participants. pages 550–555.
Gama,K.(2017b).Preliminaryfindingsonsoftwareengineeringpracticesin civic hackathons. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE), pages 14–20.
Gama, K., Alencar Gonc ̧alves, B., and Alessio, P. (2018). Hackathons in the formal learning process. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, pages 248–253, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Hartmann, S., Mainka, A., and Stock, W. G. (2019). Innovation contests: How to engage citizens in solving urban problems? In Civic Engagement and Politics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pages 58–77. IGI Global.
Hou, Y. and Wang, D. (2017). Hacking with npos: Collaborative analytics and broker roles in civic data hackathons. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Inte- ract., 1(CSCW):53:1–53:16.
Komssi, M., Pichlis, D., Raatikainen, M., Kindstro ̈m, K., and Ja ̈rvinen, J. (2015). What are hackathons for? IEEE Software, 32(5):60–67.
Leite, T. H. S., Filho, F. F., de Almeida Melo, L., de Souza, C. R. B., and da Silva Junior, F. F. (2019). Fatores que influenciam na continuidade da colaboração entre equipes de projetos desenvolvidos em eventos de curta duração. In Anais do XV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos, pages80–85, PortoAlegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.
Matheus, R., Maia Ribeiro, M., and Vaz, J. (2015). Brazil towards government 2.0: Strategies for adopting open government data in national and subna- tional governments. pages 121–138.
Melo, L. d. A., da Silva Junior, F. F., Leite, T. H. d. S., Filho, F. F., and de Souza, C. R. B. (2018). Going beyond the challenge! investigating the aspects that attract people to participate in hackathons. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC 2018, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Nandi, A. and Mandernach, M. (2016). Hackathons as an informal learning platform. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, SIGCSE ’16, pages 346–351, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Nolte, A., Pe-Than, E. P. P., Filippova, A., Bird, C., Scallen, S., and Herbsleb, J. D. (2018). You hacked and now what?: - exploring outcomes of a corpo- rate hackathon. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 2(CSCW):129:1–129:23.
Pe-Than, E. P. P., Nolte, A., Filippova, A., Bird, C., Scallen, S., and Herbsleb, J. D. (2019). Designing corporate hackathons with a purpose: The future of software development. IEEE Softw., 36(1):15–22.
Safarov, I., Meijer, A., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22:1–24.
Sakhumuzi, M. and Emmanuel, O. (2017). Student per- ception of the contribution of hackathon and collaborative learning approach on com- puter programming pass rate. In 2017 Conference on Information Communication Technology and Society (ICTAS), pages 1–5.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Rese- arch: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
Trainer, E. H., Kalyanasundaram, A., Chaihirunkarn, C., and Herbsleb, J. D. (2016). How to hackathon: Socio-technical tradeoffs in brief, intensive colloca- tion. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing, CSCW ’16, page 1118–1130, New York, NY, USA. Associ- ation for Computing Machinery.
Valença, G.,Lacerda,N.,Rebelo,M.E.,Alves,C.,anddeSouza,C.R. (2019). On the benefits of corporate hackathons for software ecosystems–a systematic mapping study. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pages 367–382. Springer.
Warner, J. and Guo, P. J. (2017). Hack.edu: Examining how college hackathons are perceived by student attendees and non-attendees. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER ’17, pages 254–262, New York, NY, USA. ACM
Publicado
30/06/2020
Como Citar
PINHEIRO, André; DE SOUZA, Cleidson ; TENÓRIO JR., Nelson ; FIGUEIRA FILHO, Fernando ; MELO, Leandro de Almeida.
O que Acontece após um Hackathon? Um Estudo Empírico. In: SEMINÁRIO INTEGRADO DE SOFTWARE E HARDWARE (SEMISH), 47. , 2020, Cuiabá.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2020
.
p. 1-12.
ISSN 2595-6205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/semish.2020.11312.
