Plataformas flexíveis para experimentação: o caminho para atender as novas demandas de experimentação científica em TICs
Resumo
Neste artigo são discutidos os principais desafios na oferta de ambientes para experimentação científica (Testbeds) em TICs, cujas demandas têm se caracterizado pela crescente necessidade de ensaios mais heterogêneos e complexos. A busca pelo equilíbrio entre oferecer uma plataforma para experimentação flexíveis o suficiente para acolher pesquisas interdisciplinares e, ainda assim, que possibilite experimentações especializadas têm sido a abordagem adotada pelo Serviço de Testbeds RNP. Os autores detalham neste trabalho as iniciativas adotadas pela RNP com o propósito de buscar este equilíbrio e expandir o escopo de atendimento das infraestruturas de experimentação disponíveis.
Referências
BIAGI, Federico. (2013), ICT and Productivity: A Review of the Literature.
NIEBEL, Thomas. (2018), ICT and economic growth-Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Development 104, p. 197-211.
BALDIN, Ilya, et al. (2019), Fabric: A national-scale programmable experimental network infrastructure. IEEE Internet Computing 23.6, p. 38-47.
CHUN, Brent, et al. (2003), Planetlab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 33.3, p. 2-12.
JIANG, Dajie, e Guangyi Liu. (2016), An overview of 5G requirements. 5G Mobile Communications, p. 3-26.
TICHY, Walter F. (1998), Should computer scientists experiment more?. Computer 31.5, p. 32-40.
SALMITO, Tiago et al. (2014), Fibre: an international testbed for future internet experimentation. Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos-SBRC 2014.
GAVRAS, Anastasius et al. (2007), Future internet research and experimentation: the FIRE initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v. 37, n. 3, p. 89-92.
FABRIC. (2023), FABRIC Testbed Web Page. Disponível em <https://whatisfabric.net/>. Acesso em 12 mar. 2023.
DI STEFANO, Giada et al. (2012), Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research policy, v. 41, n. 8, p. 1283, 2012.
MEWADA, Shivlal. (2023), Exploration of Research Challenges and Potential Applications in IoT. Encyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning, p. 2286-2297.
GOMEZ, A. K. e Bajaj, S. (2019), Challenges of Testing Complex Internet of Things (IoT) Devices and Systems. 11th International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), Da Nang, Vietnam, 2019, pp. 1-4.
HUEDO, E., et al. (2021), Enabling an edge infrastructure according to a disaggregated distributed cloud architecture and an opportunistic model based on bare-metal providers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 116, 1-14.
HOFER, C., Kastner, W., e Scholz, B. (2019), Shifting industrial control software from dedicated hardware to bare-metal servers or cloud computing platforms using off-the-shelf technologies. Journal of Systems and Software, 157, 110391.
PHUC, N. H., THANH, N. T. e Thanh, N. H. (2022), Node-Based Horizontal Pod Autoscaler in KubeEdge-Based Edge Computing Infrastructure. IEEE Access, (10), 134417-134426.
PHUC, N. H., PHAN, T. H. e KIM, D. H. (2022), Traffic-Aware Horizontal Pod Autoscaler in Kubernetes-Based Edge Computing Infrastructure. IEEE Access, 10, 18966-18977.
BELTRAN, Rafael D. et al. (2022), Orquestrando Avaliaçõess Experimentais com ICN-Stage. Anais do XIII Workshop de Pesquisa Experimental da Internet do Futuro. SBC, 2022. p. 1-6.
TALEB, Tarik et al. (2017), On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, v. 19, n. 3, p. 1657-1681, 2017.
SFI2. (2023), SFI-2 Web Page. <https://sites.google.com/view/sfi2/home>. Acesso em 10 mar. 2023.
COSTA, S. W. D. S. et al. (2021), WHOT, a Novel Tool to Assist Women Victims of Violence: A Case Study in the Brazilian Amazon. IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 95046-95060, 2021.
BORESCOPE. (2023), Network Borescope Web Page. Disponível em <https://bit.ly/42cakby>. Acesso em 9 mar. 2023.
ZHANG, Y., et al. (2021), A federated testbed for edge computing research. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 147, 1-10.
Li, Y., et al. (2021), Federated learning testbeds: A survey. IEEE Access, 9, 128925-128940.
Wang, Y., et al. (2020), Federated testbeds for internet of things research: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(10), 9675-9686.
RAKOTOARIVELO, Thierry et al. (2010), OMF: a control and management framework for networking testbeds. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, v. 43, n. 4, p. 54-59, 2010.
MARIN, Gerard e NAVARRO, Leandro. (2014), Federation of community networking testbeds”.
IEEE 10th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob). IEEE, 2014. p. 200-204.
HAUSER, Frederik et al. (2023), A survey on data plane programming with p4: Fundamentals, advances, and applied research. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, v. 212, p. 103561, 2023.
NIEBEL, Thomas. (2018), ICT and economic growth-Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Development 104, p. 197-211.
BALDIN, Ilya, et al. (2019), Fabric: A national-scale programmable experimental network infrastructure. IEEE Internet Computing 23.6, p. 38-47.
CHUN, Brent, et al. (2003), Planetlab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 33.3, p. 2-12.
JIANG, Dajie, e Guangyi Liu. (2016), An overview of 5G requirements. 5G Mobile Communications, p. 3-26.
TICHY, Walter F. (1998), Should computer scientists experiment more?. Computer 31.5, p. 32-40.
SALMITO, Tiago et al. (2014), Fibre: an international testbed for future internet experimentation. Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos-SBRC 2014.
GAVRAS, Anastasius et al. (2007), Future internet research and experimentation: the FIRE initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v. 37, n. 3, p. 89-92.
FABRIC. (2023), FABRIC Testbed Web Page. Disponível em <https://whatisfabric.net/>. Acesso em 12 mar. 2023.
DI STEFANO, Giada et al. (2012), Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research policy, v. 41, n. 8, p. 1283, 2012.
MEWADA, Shivlal. (2023), Exploration of Research Challenges and Potential Applications in IoT. Encyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning, p. 2286-2297.
GOMEZ, A. K. e Bajaj, S. (2019), Challenges of Testing Complex Internet of Things (IoT) Devices and Systems. 11th International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), Da Nang, Vietnam, 2019, pp. 1-4.
HUEDO, E., et al. (2021), Enabling an edge infrastructure according to a disaggregated distributed cloud architecture and an opportunistic model based on bare-metal providers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 116, 1-14.
HOFER, C., Kastner, W., e Scholz, B. (2019), Shifting industrial control software from dedicated hardware to bare-metal servers or cloud computing platforms using off-the-shelf technologies. Journal of Systems and Software, 157, 110391.
PHUC, N. H., THANH, N. T. e Thanh, N. H. (2022), Node-Based Horizontal Pod Autoscaler in KubeEdge-Based Edge Computing Infrastructure. IEEE Access, (10), 134417-134426.
PHUC, N. H., PHAN, T. H. e KIM, D. H. (2022), Traffic-Aware Horizontal Pod Autoscaler in Kubernetes-Based Edge Computing Infrastructure. IEEE Access, 10, 18966-18977.
BELTRAN, Rafael D. et al. (2022), Orquestrando Avaliaçõess Experimentais com ICN-Stage. Anais do XIII Workshop de Pesquisa Experimental da Internet do Futuro. SBC, 2022. p. 1-6.
TALEB, Tarik et al. (2017), On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, v. 19, n. 3, p. 1657-1681, 2017.
SFI2. (2023), SFI-2 Web Page. <https://sites.google.com/view/sfi2/home>. Acesso em 10 mar. 2023.
COSTA, S. W. D. S. et al. (2021), WHOT, a Novel Tool to Assist Women Victims of Violence: A Case Study in the Brazilian Amazon. IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 95046-95060, 2021.
BORESCOPE. (2023), Network Borescope Web Page. Disponível em <https://bit.ly/42cakby>. Acesso em 9 mar. 2023.
ZHANG, Y., et al. (2021), A federated testbed for edge computing research. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 147, 1-10.
Li, Y., et al. (2021), Federated learning testbeds: A survey. IEEE Access, 9, 128925-128940.
Wang, Y., et al. (2020), Federated testbeds for internet of things research: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(10), 9675-9686.
RAKOTOARIVELO, Thierry et al. (2010), OMF: a control and management framework for networking testbeds. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, v. 43, n. 4, p. 54-59, 2010.
MARIN, Gerard e NAVARRO, Leandro. (2014), Federation of community networking testbeds”.
IEEE 10th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob). IEEE, 2014. p. 200-204.
HAUSER, Frederik et al. (2023), A survey on data plane programming with p4: Fundamentals, advances, and applied research. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, v. 212, p. 103561, 2023.
Publicado
26/05/2023
Como Citar
MONDIN, Leandro; DIAS, Gustavo.
Plataformas flexíveis para experimentação: o caminho para atender as novas demandas de experimentação científica em TICs. In: WORKSHOP DE PESQUISA EXPERIMENTAL DA INTERNET DO FUTURO (WPEIF), 14. , 2023, Brasília/DF.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2023
.
p. 25-32.
ISSN 2595-2692.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wpeif.2023.791.
