Proposal for a gamification strategy applied to remote learning




gamification, remote learning, distance education, motivation


With the rapid and drastic evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic at the end of 2019, interventions in the social interaction of the world population were necessary. Despite the distance from socializing, people’s routines needed to remain normal as far as possible, and this includes student learning. Thus, the solution for educational institutions was to migrate activities to the remote teaching format as an emergency. As expected, some obstacles were encountered, and others were accentuated and requiring strategies to help mitigate such problems. Several studies point to demotivation as one of the main elements that affect students in terms of low academic performance and, consequently, culminating in low learning achievement, high failure rates, and dropout rates. The objective of this study is to propose, for Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) activities, a simple gamification strategy aimed at student engagement. An exploratory literature review was carried out to identify potentially key points that could be adopted, which could influence student motivation. Based on this, the primary motivational activators for the gamification strategy were listed in Framework Octalysis. As a way of validating the technique, two not mandatory classes were taught in a remote format containing the same course content (Introductory to the Internet of Things (IoT)), differentiating between the control group (without interventions) and the group with the application of the proposed strategy of gamification. The expected result was the perception of greater engagement in the class with the application of the gamification strategy against the control class, but it was not achieved as expected. The research found that students had low participation and engagement in both traditional and gamified classes, even after intervention. This could be due to factors such as course duration, lack of collaboration, and teacher involvement. Both classes had the same completion and dropout rate (2 completions and 13 dropouts). As future works, the authors suggest interviewing students to understand the causes of demotivation and using Design Thinking, plan to investigate the root causes of low participation and develop actions for the ”Ownership and Possession” motivational activator, apply improvements to larger classes, introduce a student/monitor role, and compare gamification in regular and non-mandatory classes.


Download data is not yet available.


Alves, C., Lima, D., Alcântara, I., and Osshiro, M. (2022). O uso da gamificação no processo de ensino-aprendizagem do ensino médio: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Anais Estendidos do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pages 703–712.

Alves, L. and Santos, W. (2018). Uma taxonomia avaliativa para jogos digitais educacionais. XVII SBGames. Foz do Iguaçu, page 4.

Araújo, I. and Carvalho, A. A. (2017). Capacitar professores para o uso da gamificação. Atas do XIX Simpósio Internacional de Informática Educativa e VIII Encontro do CIED–III Encontro Internacional, pages 264–269.

Ater-Kranov, A., Bryant, R., Orr, G., Wallace, S., and Zhang, M. (2010). Developing a community definition and teaching modules for computational thinking: accomplishments and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Information technology education, pages 143–148.

Brasil (2017). Decreto nº 9.057, de 25 de maio de 2017. regulamenta o art. 80 da lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996, que estabelece as diretrizes e bases da educação nacional. Diário Oficial da União.

Buckley, P. and Doyle, E. (2016). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive learning environments, 24(6):1162–1175.

Chou, Y.-k. (2019). Actionable gamification: Beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. Packt Publishing Ltd, page 512.

Da Silva, J. A. L., Oliveira, F. C. S., and Martins, D. J. S. (2018a). Gamificação e storytelling como estratégia motivacional no ensino de programação. XVII SBGames. Foz do Iguaçu, 17:1–6.

Da Silva, T. R., Cordeiro, J. R., dos Santos, R. S. F., dos Santos, F. G., da Silva Aranha, E. H., and Silva, F. G. (2018b). Uma análise do cenário nacional do uso de jogos para o ensino e aprendizagem de computação. XVII SBGames. Foz do Iguaçu, page 10.

Eisenberg, E. and Dowsett, T. (1990). Student drop-out from a distance education project course: A new method of analysis. Distance education, 11(2):231–253.

Ferreira Filho, L. d. F. A., Júnior, F. N. P., Magalhães, F. A., de Brito Firmino, F. E., dos Santos, R. d. S., and Madeira, C. A. G. (2020). Pac-mana: Uma proposta de gamificação para cursos on-line. XIX SBGames. Recife, page 8.

Flach, G. I. and Ferreira, V. H. (2020). Uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre a avaliação do uso de jogos na educação. XIX SBGames. Recife, page 4.

Hamilton, L. S., Kaufman, J. H., and Diliberti, M. (2020). Teaching and leading through a pandemic: Key findings from the american educator panels spring 2020 covid-19 surveys. data note: Insights from the american educator panels. research report. rr-a168-2. RAND Corporation.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Bond, A., et al. (2020a). As diferenças entre o aprendizado online e o ensino remoto de emergência. Revista da escola, professor, educação e tecnologia, 2.

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., and Bond, M. A. (2020b). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.

Horn, M. B. and Staker, H. (2017). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. John Wiley & Sons.

Joye, C. R., Moreira, M. M., and Rocha, S. S. D. (2020). Educação a distância ou atividade educacional remota emergencial: em busca do elo perdido da educação escolar em tempos de covid-19. Research, Society and Development, 9(7).

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons, page 504.

Kay, J. (2020). Remote learning.

Lee, J. J. and Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic exchange quarterly, 15(2):146.

Lopes, W., Fernandes, I., Augusto, P., and Madeira, C. A. G. (2021). Estratégia de gamificação aplicada ao ensino remoto emergencial em tempos de covid-19. In Anais Estendidos do XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pages 437–444. SBC.

Mesquita, A. (2017). Design thinking na educação presencial, a distância e corporativa. TECCOGS: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, (16).

Razzouk, R. and Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of educational research, 82(3):330–348.

Teixeira, R. K. and Jucá, P. M. (2021). Engaja: Um arcabouço de gamificação para aumentar o engajamento dos alunos em um instituição de ensino superior. In Anais Estendidos do XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pages 427–436. SBC.

Werbach, K. and Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press, page 144.




How to Cite

LOPES, W.; AUGUSTO, P.; FERNANDES, I.; MADEIRA, C. Proposal for a gamification strategy applied to remote learning. Journal on Interactive Systems, Porto Alegre, RS, v. 15, n. 1, p. 92–103, 2024. DOI: 10.5753/jis.2024.2700. Disponível em: Acesso em: 21 feb. 2024.



Regular Paper