The Use of Personality Traits to Enhance Theory-driven Group Formation

Autores

  • Rachel Carlos Duque Reis Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Campus Rio Paranaíba - IEP
  • Kamila Takayama Lyra Universidade de São Paulo, Campus São Carlos – ICMC/USP
  • Clausius Duque Gonçalves Reis Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Campus Rio Paranaíba - IEP
  • Bruno Elias Penteado Universidade de São Paulo, Campus São Carlos – ICMC/USP
  • Seiji Isotani Universidade de São Paulo, Campus São Carlos – ICMC/USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.796

Palavras-chave:

CSCL, Group Formation, Algorithm, Personality Trait, Learning Theory

Resumo

Group formation is an important and challenging element for designing successful CSCL scenarios. Despite efforts from the scientific community in developing more effective algorithms to support group formation processes, we still face problems related to learners’ resistance and demotivation towards group work. In this sense, diverse studies highlight the importance of considering learners’ personality traits to form groups, since this factor can influence students’ performance and induce diverse actions and behaviors in group work. Therefore, this paper presents G-FusionPT (Group Formation USIng Ontology and Personality Trait), a group formation algorithm that support new learning roles, denominated Affective Collaborative Learning roles, based on relation between collaborative learning theories and students’ personality traits. The algorithm is based on a collaborative ontology to understand the learning theories (e.g., context, learning activities, group structure), and learners profile to understand learners’ needs (e.g., target/current knowledge/skill). To evaluate the algorithm, we used a 300 student simulated sample with varying group size (three, five, and seven members), and compared G-FusionPT results to other group formation algorithms: G-Fusion (based specifically on collaborative learning theories) and Random (no strategy or criterion). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of G-FusionPT against G-Fusion and Random algorithms, as it generated the highest average percentage of learners in well-formed groups and lowest average percentage of learners in unfit groups.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abnar, S., Orooji, F., & Taghiyareh, F. (2012). An evolutionary algorithm for forming mixed groups of learners in web based collaborative learning environments. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Technology Enhanced Education (ICTEE) (pp. 1–6). [DOI: 10.1109/ICTEE.2012.6208612].[GS Search]

Altanopoulou, P., & Tselios, N. (2015). How does personality affect wiki-mediated learning?. International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL) (pp. 16–18). IEEE, Thessaloniki, Greece. [DOI: 10.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359546].[GS Search]

Allport, G. W. (1927). Concepts of trait and personality. Psychological Bulletin, US: Psychological Review Company, vol. 24, 284–293.[GS Search]

Amara, S., Macedo, J., Bendella, & F., Santos, A. (2016). Group Formation in Mobile Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Contexts: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 258–273.[GS Search]

Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of Cognitive Skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369-406 (1982).[DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369].[GS Search]

Barkley, E., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A practical guide to promoting learning in groups. [S.l.]: Jossey Bass.

Bartlett, J. E. , Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins C. C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), p. 43-50.[GS Search]

Borges, S., Mizoguchi, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S. (2018). Group formation in CSCL: A review of the state of the art. In Cristea, A. I., Bittencourt, I. I., Lima, F. (Eds.). Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 832 (pp. 71–88). Springer, Cham. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2_5].[GS Search]

Borst, W. (1997). Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. Phd thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.[GS Search]

Bradley, J. H., & Herbert, F., J. (1997). The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development, 16, 337–353.[GS Search]

Brauer, S., & Schmidt, T. C. (2012). Group formation in elearning-enabled online social networks. In: 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), (pp. 1–8). IEEE, Villach, Austria.[DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2012.6402070].[GS Search]

Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2004). Socio-cognitive conflict and the role of student interaction in learning. New Review of social Psychology, 3 (1-2), 80–87.[GS Search]

Cadavid, J. M., Ovalle, D. A., Vicari, R. M. (2012). A genetic algorithm approach for group formation in collaborative learning considering multiple student characteristics. Computers & Education, 58, 560–569.[DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.011].[GS Search]

Caropreso, E., & Chen, S. J. (2003). The Impact of Personality on Collaborative Online Learning. In Crawford, C., Davis, N., Price, J., Weber, R., & Willis , D. (Eds.), International Conference of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (pp. 2371–2375). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.[GS Search]

Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2011). Collaboration and psychological ownership: how does the tension between the two influence perceived learning?. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 283–298.[DOI: 10.1007/s11218-010-9141-z].[GS Search]

Challco, G. C., Moreira, D. A., Bittencourt, I. I., Mizoguchi, & R., Isotani, S. (2015). Personalization of Gamification in Collaborative Learning Contexts using Ontologies. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 13(6), 1995–2002.[DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2015.7164227].[GS Search]

Craig, M., Horton, D., & Pitt, F. (2010). Forming reasonably optimal groups (FROG). In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 141–15). [DOI: 10.1145/1880071.1880094].[GS Search]

Cravens-Brown, L. M. (2002). Eysenck and Antisocial Behavior: An Analysis of the Associations Between Personality Styles and Problems with Conduc. 75p. Tese (Dissertation) — Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.[GS Search]

Cruz W. M., & Isotani S. (2014). Group Formation Algorithms in Collaborative Learning Contexts: A Systematic Mapping of the Literature. In Baloian N., Burstein F., Ogata H., Santoro F., Zurita G. (Eds), Collaboration and Technology, CRIWG 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8658 (pp. 199–214). Springer, Cham. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10166-8_18].[GS Search]

CTGV (1992). Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt: Anchored instruction in science education. In: Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice, 244–273. SUNY Press.

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Kirschner, P. A. (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Nederland.[GS Search]

Endlsey, W. R. (1980). Peer tutorial instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology. [GS Search]

Eysench, H. J. & Eysenck, S. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Junior. [S.l.]: Hodder and Stoughton.

Farhangian, M., Purvis, M., Purvis, M., & Savarimuthu, T. B. R. (2015). The effects of temperament and team formation mechanism on collaborative learning of knowledge and skill in short-term projects. Advances in Social Computing and Multiagent Systems, 48–65. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24804-2_4].[GS Search]

García-Vélez, R. A., López-Nores, M., Blanco-Fernández, Y., & Pazos-Arias, J. J. (2016). Using Cortical Learning Algorithm to Arrange Sporadic Online Conversation Groups According to Personality Traits. In: Zaphiris P., Ioannou A. (Eds), Learning and Collaboration Technologies, LCT 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9753 (pp. 429–436). Springer, Cham. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_39].[GS Search]

Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Boas, G., Liakou, E., & Grigoriadou, M. (2007). Forming Homogeneous, Heterogeneous and Mixed Groups of Learners. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Personalization in Learning Environments at Individual and Group Level (pp. 33–40). [GS Search]

Graf, S. & Bekele, R. (2006). Forming Heterogeneous Groups for Intelligent Collaborative Learning Systems with Ant Colony Optimization. In Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., & Chan, T.-W. (Eds.), ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053(pp. 217–226). Springer, Heidelberg. [DOI: 10.1007/11774303_22].[GS Search]

Harrison, R. L. (2010). Introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1204 (pp. 17–21). [DOI: 10.1063/1.3295638].[GS Search]

Heaven, P. C., Ciarrochi, J., & Vialle, W. (2007). Conscientiousness and eysenckian psychoticism as predictors of school grades: A one-year longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), p. 535–546.[GS Search]

Inaba, A. & Mizoguchi, R. (2004). Learner's Role and Predictable Educational Benefits in Collaborative Learning. In Lester J.C., Vicari R.M., Paraguaçu F. (Eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3220. (pp. 285–294). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.[DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_27].[GS Search]

Inaba, A. & Mizoguchi, R. (2008). Adventures in the boundary between domain-independent ontologies and domain content for CSCL. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R. J., & Jain, L. C. (Eds.), Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (pp. 523–532). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.[DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85567-5_65].[GS Search]

Inaba A., Supnithi T., Ikeda M., Mizoguchi R., & Toyoda J. (2000). How Can We Form Effective Collaborative Learning Groups?. In Gauthier G., Frasson C., & VanLehn K. (Eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1839 (pp. 282–291). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.[DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45108-0_32].[GS Search]

Isotani. S. (2009). An Ontological Engineering Approach to Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning - From Theory to Practice. Phd in Engineering, Information and Communication Technology, Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Japan.[GS Search]

Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 445–478.[DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9072-x].[GS Search]

Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S., Capeli, O. M., Isotani, N., De Albuquerque, A. R., Bittencourt, I. I., & Jaques, P. (2013). A semantic web-based authoring tool to facilitate the planning of collaborative learning scenarios compliant with learning theories. Computers & Education, 63, 267–284. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, UK.[DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.009].[GS Search]

Jaques, P. A. & Nunes, M. A. S. N. (2012). Ambientes Inteligentes de Aprendizagem que inferem, expressam e possuem emoções e personalidade. In Isotani, S. e Campos, F. C. A. (Org.). Jornada de Atualização em Informática na Educação- JAIE 2012, vol. 1 (p. 32-71), Porto Alegre.[GS Search]

Konert J., Bellhäuser H., Röpke R., Gallwas E., & Zucik A. (2016). MoodlePeers: Factors Relevant in Learning Group Formation for Improved Learning Outcomes, Satisfaction and Commitment in E-Learning Scenarios Using GroupAL. In: Verbert K., Sharples M., Klobučar T. (Eds), Adaptive and Adaptable Learning, EC-TEL 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9891 (pp. 390–396). Springer, Cham.[DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_32].[GS Search]

Lin, Y. -T., Huang, Y.-M., & Cheng, S. -C. (2010). An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1483–1493.[DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.014].[GS Search]

Mizoguchi, R. (2003). Tutorial on Ontological Engineering: Part 1: Introduction to Ontological Engineering. New Generation Computing, 21 (4), 365–384.[DOI: 10.1007/BF03037311].[GS Search]

Nunes, M. A. S. N. (2008). Recommender Systems based on Personality Traits. PhD Thesis, Université Montpellier II, Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc.[GS Search]

Nunes, M. A. S. N., Bezerra, J. S., Reinert, D., Moraes, D., Silva, É. P., & Pereira, A. J. S. (2010). Computação Afetiva e sua influência na personalização de Ambientes Educacionais: gerando equipes compatíveis para uso em AVAs na EaD. In: MACHADO, G. J. C. (Ed.), Educação e Ciberespaço: Estudos, propostas e desafios (pp. 308–347). Aracaju: Virtus Editora.[GS Search]

Pacheco, L. & Sisto, F. F. (2003). Aprendizagem por interação e traços de personalidade. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 7(1), p. 69–76.[GS Search]

Petrides, K. V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Frederickson, N., & Furnham, A. (2005). Explaining individual differences in scholastic behaviour and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), p. 239–255.[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D. (2019). Formação de grupos em ambientes cscl utilizando traços de personalidade associados às teorias de aprendizagem colaborativa. Tese de Doutorado, Instituto De Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação, Univesidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, Brasil. [DOI: 10.11606/T.55.2019.tde-11062019-111943].[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D., Rodriguez, C. L., Challco, G. C., Jaques, P. A., Bittencourt, I. I.; Isotani, S. (2015b). Relação entre os Estados Afetivos e as Teorias de Aprendizagem na Formação de Grupos em Ambientes CSCL. XXVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, Maceió. p. 1012-1021. [DOI: 10.5753/cbie.sbie.2015.1012].[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D., Rodriguez, C. L., Challco, G. C., Lyra, K. T., Marques, L. B., Jaques, P. A., Bittencourt, I. I.; Isotani, S. (2016). Step Towards a Model to Bridge the Gap between Personality Traits and Collaborative Learning Roles. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, v. 28, p. 124-144.[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D., Rodriguez, C. L., Lyra, K. T., Isotani, S. (2017). Estrutura Ontológica para representar Papéis Colaborativos Afetivos em ambientes CSCL. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, v. 25, p. 87-106.[DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2017.25.02.87].[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D., Rodriguez, C. L., Lyra, K. T., Jaques, P. A., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S. (2015). Affective States in CSCL Environments: A Systematic Mapping of the Literature. In: IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Hualien, p. 335-339. [DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2015.95].[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D., Rodriguez, C. L., Lyra, K. T., Jaques, P. A., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S. (2015a). Estado da Arte sobre Afetividade na Formação de Grupos em Ambientes Colaborativos de Aprendizagem. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, v. 23, p. 113-130.[DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2015.23.03.113].[GS Search]

Reis, R. C. D., Isotani, S., Rodriguez, C. L., Lyra, K. T., Jaques, P. A., & Bittencourt, I. I. (2018). Affective states in computer-supported collaborative learning: Studying the past to drive the future. Computers & Education, v. 120, p. 29-50.[DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2017.25.02.87].[GS Search]

Rodrigues, M. C., & Silva, R. d. L. M. da. (2012). Avaliação de um programa de promoção da empatia implementado na educação infantil. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 12(1), p. 59–75.[GS Search]

Rumelhart, D. E., Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, Tuning, and Restructuring: Modes of Learning. In Cotton, J. W., & Klatzky, R. L. (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition. LEA (pp. 37–53).

Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed Cognitions. Cambridge University Press.

Shin-ike, K., & Iima, H. (2008). A method for improving learning effect by using prediction model and an optimization algorithm. Annual conference of the society of instrument and control engineers of Japan - SICE (pp. 2685–2690).[DOI: 10.1109/SICE.2008.4655121].[GS Search]

Shin-ike, K. & Iima, H. (2009). A method for Development of collaborative learning by using a neural network and a genetic algorithm. In International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE, Athens, Greece (2009).[DOI: 10.1109/ISADS.2009.5207353].[GS Search]

Sinha, T. (2014). Together we stand, together we fall, together we win: dynamic team formation in massive open online courses. In: 5th International Conference on Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT). Bangalore, India.[DOI: 10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814694].[GS Search]

So, H., & Brush, T. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.[DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009].[GS Search]

Srba, I., & Bielikova, M. (2015). Dynamic Group Formation as an Approach to Collaborative Learning Support. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(2), 173–186.[DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2014.2373374].[GS Search]

Yan, Q., & Chen, L. (2013). A Learning Grouping Algorithm Based on User Personality. In 8th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE 2013) (pp. 71–75). IEEE, Colombo, Sri Lanka.[DOI: 10.1109/ICCSE.2013.6553886].[GS Search]

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2020-10-18

Como Citar

REIS, R. C. D.; LYRA, K. T.; REIS, C. D. G.; PENTEADO, B. E.; ISOTANI, S. The Use of Personality Traits to Enhance Theory-driven Group Formation. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, [S. l.], v. 28, p. 796–818, 2020. DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.796. Disponível em: https://sol.sbc.org.br/journals/index.php/rbie/article/view/3962. Acesso em: 29 abr. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)