Impacto do Uso da Peer Instruction no Ensino Superior de Lógica para Computação no Brasil
Resumo
Um dos desafios da pesquisa na Educação em Computação é a proposição de novos métodos de ensino-aprendizagem. Pesquisas apontam que os métodos de aprendizagem ativa são mais efetivos do que os tradicionais. A Peer Instruction é um destes métodos de aprendizagem que promove uma aula centrada no estudante, possibilitando ele construir a sua compreensão através de uma abordagem estruturada com questões e discussões aos pares, sendo utilizada na Computação nos últimos anos. Todavia, pesquisas sobre o uso deste método são bem escassas na América Sul. Desta forma, o objetivo desta pesquisa é discutir o impacto do uso da Peer Instruction na Educação Superior em Computação no Brasil, no ensino de Lógica para Computação. O contexto da pesquisa é a turma do Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação de 2018.1 da Universidade Federal de Jataí. Foram constatadas evidências suficientes para a veracidade de duas proposições referentes ao estudo: (a) A utilização da Peer Instruction garante um ganho de aprendizagem dos alunos; e (b) A Peer Instruction é bem recebida pelos alunos. Conclui-se que o uso da Peer Instruction é adequada para a Educação Superior em Computação no Brasil, havendo boa receptividade dos estudantes.
Palavras-chave:
educação, computação, lógica, peer instruction
Referências
Ives Solano Araujo and Eric Mazur. 2013. Instrução pelos colegas e ensino sobmedida: uma proposta para o engajamento dos alunos no processo de ensino-aprendizagem de Física. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física. Florianópolis. Vol. 30, n. 2 (ago. 2013), p. 362-384 (2013).
David Paul Ausubel. 2000. Preview of Assimilation Theory of Meaningful Learning and Retention. In The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science & Business Media, 01–18.
Ali Günay Balım. 2009. The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students’ Success and Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 35 (2009), 1–20.
Leland Beck and Alexander Chizhik. 2013. Cooperative learning instructional methods for CS1: Design, implementation, and evaluation.ACM Transactions on (Online) Computing Education (TOCE), 13 (2013), 10.
Charles C Bonwell and James A Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
Joe D Chase and Edward G Okie. 2000. Combining cooperative learning and peer instruction in introductory computer science. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 32. ACM, 372–376.
Patricia Mariotto Mozzaquatro Chicon, Cindia Rosa Toniazzo Quaresma, and Solange Beatriz Billig Garcês. 2018. Aplicação do Método de ensino Peer Instruction para o Ensino de Lógica de Programação com acadêmicos do Curso de Ciência da Computação. In Anais do 5º SENID (Seminário Nacional de Inclusão Digital) - Cultura Digital na Educação.
C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur. 2001. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 9 (2001), 970–977.
John Dewey. 2004. Democracy and education. Courier Corporation.
Sally Fincher and Marian Petre. 2004. Mapping the territory. In Computer science education research (2004).
Fabrício M Gonçalves, Alessandro Arpetti, and M Cecília C Baranauskas. 2014.Facilitando a construção social de significado em sistemas de aprendizado colaborativo. In Proceedings of the XIX international workshop on educational software,TISE, Vol. 10. 318–326.
Scott Grissom. 2013. Introduction to special issue on alternatives to lecture in the computer science classroom. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 13, 3 (2013).
Richard R Hake. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: Asix-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.American Journal of Physics, 66, 1 (1998), 64–74.
David Hammer. 1995. Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 3 (1995), 401–430.
David Hammer. 1997. Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and instruction, 15, 4 (1997), 485–529.
Christian Holmboe, Linda McIver, and Carlisle George. 2001. Research agenda for computer science education. In 13th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Vol. 207223.
William E Johnson, Allison Luzader, Irfan Ahmed, Vassil Roussev, Golden Richard III, and Cynthia B Lee. 2016. Development of Peer Instruction Questions for Cybersecurity Education. In 2016 USENIX Workshop on Advances in Security Education (ASE 16). USENIX Association.
Kenneth Kotovsky, John R Hayes, and Herbert A Simon. 1985. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive psychology, 17, 2 (1985),248–294.
Cynthia Bailey Lee, Saturnino Garcia, and Leo Porter. 2013. Can Peer Instruction Be Effective in Upper-division Computer Science Courses? Trans. Comput. Educ.13, 3, Article 12 (Aug. 2013), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2499947.2499949
E. Mazur. 1997. Peer Instruction: a User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall.
Maria da Graça Nicoletti Mizukami. 1986. Abordagem Tradicional. Editora Pedagógica e Universitária (EPU), Chapter 1, 7–18.
Richard S. Moog and James N. Spencer. 2008. POGIL: An Overview. Chapter 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0994.ch001
Maykon Gonçalves Müller, Ives Solano Araujo, Eliane Angela Veit, and JulieSchell. 2017. Uma revisão da literatura acerca da implementação da metodologia interativa de ensino Peer Instruction (1991 a 2015). Revista brasileira de ensino de Física. São Paulo. Vol. 39, n. 3 (jul./set. 2017), e3403, 20 p.(2017).
Tomoko Nemoto and David Beglar. 2014. Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. In JALT 2013 Conference Proceedings. 1–8.
Keila de Fátima Chagas Nogueira and Kenedy Lopes Nogueira. 2018. Aplicação de Metodologias Ativas utilizando Tecnologia Educacional. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2185. 530–535.
Maria Angélica Figueiredo Oliveira, José Valdeni de Lima, Alberto Bastos do Canto Filho, Felipe Becker Nunes, Luciana V Lourega, and Jorge Nazareno Batista Melo. 2017. Aplicação do método Peer Instruction no ensino de Algoritmos e programação de computadores. RENOTE15, 1 (2017).
Leo Porter, Cynthia Bailey Lee, and Beth Simon. 2013. Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses. In Proceeding of the44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 177–182.
L. Porter, C. Bailey Lee, B. Simon, and D. Zingaro. 2011. Peer Instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing?. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research. ACM, 45–52.
Leo Porter, Dennis Bouvier, Quintin Cutts, Scott Grissom, Cynthia Lee, Robert McCartney, Daniel Zingaro, and Beth Simon. 2016. A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing. ACM Inroads, 7, 2 (May 2016),76–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2938142
Anthony Robins. 2015. The ongoing challenges of computer science education research. Computer Science Education, 25, 2 (2015), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1034350
Luis Menasché Schechter and Luziane F de Mendonça. 2017. Uma Aplicação da Metodologia de “Sala de Aula Invertida” no Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação da UFRJ. Proceeding Series of the Brazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 5, 1 (2017).
Prateek Shekhar, Matt Demonbrun, Maura Borrego, Cynthia Finelli, Michael Prince, Charles Henderson, and Cynthia Waters. 2015. Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 2 (2015),597–609.
Beth Simon, Michael Kohanfars, Jeff Lee, Karen Tamayo, and Quintin Cutts. 2010. Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 341–345.
Beth Simon, Julian Parris, and Jaime Spacco. 2013. How We Teach Impacts Student Learning: Peer Instruction vs. Lecture in CS0. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado,USA) (SIGCSE ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445215
Michelle K Smith, William B Wood, Wendy K Adams, Carl Wieman, Jennifer KKnight, Nancy Guild, and Tin Tin Su. 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 5910 (2009), 122–124.
Michelle K Smith, William B Wood, Ken Krauter, and Jennifer K Knight. 2011. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 1 (2011), 55–63.
R. J. Sternberg and K. Sternberg. 2017. Introdução à Psicologia Cognitiva. In Psicologia Cognitiva (7ªedição ed.). Cengage Learning, 02–31.
Katiuscia Costa Barros Teixeira and Francisca Cláudia Fernandes Fontenele. 2017. Metodologia peer instruction no ensino de matrizes: um relato de experiência an disciplina de álgebra linear. EDUCAÇÃO MATEMÁTICA EM REVISTA–RS, 1, 18(2017).
Trisha Vickrey, Kaitlyn Rosploch, Reihaneh Rahmanian, Matthew Pilarz, and Marilyne Stains. 2015. Research-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction: A literature review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14, 1 (2015), es3.
Robert K Yin. 2001. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. Bookman editora.
Daniel Zingaro. 2010. Experience Report: Peer Instruction in Remedial Computer Science. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Vol. 2010. 5030–5035.
Daniel Zingaro and Leo Porter. 2014. Peer Instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention. Computers & Education, 71 (2014), 87 – 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.015
David Paul Ausubel. 2000. Preview of Assimilation Theory of Meaningful Learning and Retention. In The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Springer Science & Business Media, 01–18.
Ali Günay Balım. 2009. The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students’ Success and Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 35 (2009), 1–20.
Leland Beck and Alexander Chizhik. 2013. Cooperative learning instructional methods for CS1: Design, implementation, and evaluation.ACM Transactions on (Online) Computing Education (TOCE), 13 (2013), 10.
Charles C Bonwell and James A Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
Joe D Chase and Edward G Okie. 2000. Combining cooperative learning and peer instruction in introductory computer science. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 32. ACM, 372–376.
Patricia Mariotto Mozzaquatro Chicon, Cindia Rosa Toniazzo Quaresma, and Solange Beatriz Billig Garcês. 2018. Aplicação do Método de ensino Peer Instruction para o Ensino de Lógica de Programação com acadêmicos do Curso de Ciência da Computação. In Anais do 5º SENID (Seminário Nacional de Inclusão Digital) - Cultura Digital na Educação.
C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur. 2001. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 9 (2001), 970–977.
John Dewey. 2004. Democracy and education. Courier Corporation.
Sally Fincher and Marian Petre. 2004. Mapping the territory. In Computer science education research (2004).
Fabrício M Gonçalves, Alessandro Arpetti, and M Cecília C Baranauskas. 2014.Facilitando a construção social de significado em sistemas de aprendizado colaborativo. In Proceedings of the XIX international workshop on educational software,TISE, Vol. 10. 318–326.
Scott Grissom. 2013. Introduction to special issue on alternatives to lecture in the computer science classroom. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 13, 3 (2013).
Richard R Hake. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: Asix-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.American Journal of Physics, 66, 1 (1998), 64–74.
David Hammer. 1995. Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 3 (1995), 401–430.
David Hammer. 1997. Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and instruction, 15, 4 (1997), 485–529.
Christian Holmboe, Linda McIver, and Carlisle George. 2001. Research agenda for computer science education. In 13th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Vol. 207223.
William E Johnson, Allison Luzader, Irfan Ahmed, Vassil Roussev, Golden Richard III, and Cynthia B Lee. 2016. Development of Peer Instruction Questions for Cybersecurity Education. In 2016 USENIX Workshop on Advances in Security Education (ASE 16). USENIX Association.
Kenneth Kotovsky, John R Hayes, and Herbert A Simon. 1985. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive psychology, 17, 2 (1985),248–294.
Cynthia Bailey Lee, Saturnino Garcia, and Leo Porter. 2013. Can Peer Instruction Be Effective in Upper-division Computer Science Courses? Trans. Comput. Educ.13, 3, Article 12 (Aug. 2013), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2499947.2499949
E. Mazur. 1997. Peer Instruction: a User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall.
Maria da Graça Nicoletti Mizukami. 1986. Abordagem Tradicional. Editora Pedagógica e Universitária (EPU), Chapter 1, 7–18.
Richard S. Moog and James N. Spencer. 2008. POGIL: An Overview. Chapter 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0994.ch001
Maykon Gonçalves Müller, Ives Solano Araujo, Eliane Angela Veit, and JulieSchell. 2017. Uma revisão da literatura acerca da implementação da metodologia interativa de ensino Peer Instruction (1991 a 2015). Revista brasileira de ensino de Física. São Paulo. Vol. 39, n. 3 (jul./set. 2017), e3403, 20 p.(2017).
Tomoko Nemoto and David Beglar. 2014. Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. In JALT 2013 Conference Proceedings. 1–8.
Keila de Fátima Chagas Nogueira and Kenedy Lopes Nogueira. 2018. Aplicação de Metodologias Ativas utilizando Tecnologia Educacional. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2185. 530–535.
Maria Angélica Figueiredo Oliveira, José Valdeni de Lima, Alberto Bastos do Canto Filho, Felipe Becker Nunes, Luciana V Lourega, and Jorge Nazareno Batista Melo. 2017. Aplicação do método Peer Instruction no ensino de Algoritmos e programação de computadores. RENOTE15, 1 (2017).
Leo Porter, Cynthia Bailey Lee, and Beth Simon. 2013. Halving fail rates using peer instruction: a study of four computer science courses. In Proceeding of the44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 177–182.
L. Porter, C. Bailey Lee, B. Simon, and D. Zingaro. 2011. Peer Instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing?. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research. ACM, 45–52.
Leo Porter, Dennis Bouvier, Quintin Cutts, Scott Grissom, Cynthia Lee, Robert McCartney, Daniel Zingaro, and Beth Simon. 2016. A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing. ACM Inroads, 7, 2 (May 2016),76–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/2938142
Anthony Robins. 2015. The ongoing challenges of computer science education research. Computer Science Education, 25, 2 (2015), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1034350
Luis Menasché Schechter and Luziane F de Mendonça. 2017. Uma Aplicação da Metodologia de “Sala de Aula Invertida” no Bacharelado em Ciência da Computação da UFRJ. Proceeding Series of the Brazilian Society of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 5, 1 (2017).
Prateek Shekhar, Matt Demonbrun, Maura Borrego, Cynthia Finelli, Michael Prince, Charles Henderson, and Cynthia Waters. 2015. Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 2 (2015),597–609.
Beth Simon, Michael Kohanfars, Jeff Lee, Karen Tamayo, and Quintin Cutts. 2010. Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 341–345.
Beth Simon, Julian Parris, and Jaime Spacco. 2013. How We Teach Impacts Student Learning: Peer Instruction vs. Lecture in CS0. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado,USA) (SIGCSE ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445215
Michelle K Smith, William B Wood, Wendy K Adams, Carl Wieman, Jennifer KKnight, Nancy Guild, and Tin Tin Su. 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 5910 (2009), 122–124.
Michelle K Smith, William B Wood, Ken Krauter, and Jennifer K Knight. 2011. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 1 (2011), 55–63.
R. J. Sternberg and K. Sternberg. 2017. Introdução à Psicologia Cognitiva. In Psicologia Cognitiva (7ªedição ed.). Cengage Learning, 02–31.
Katiuscia Costa Barros Teixeira and Francisca Cláudia Fernandes Fontenele. 2017. Metodologia peer instruction no ensino de matrizes: um relato de experiência an disciplina de álgebra linear. EDUCAÇÃO MATEMÁTICA EM REVISTA–RS, 1, 18(2017).
Trisha Vickrey, Kaitlyn Rosploch, Reihaneh Rahmanian, Matthew Pilarz, and Marilyne Stains. 2015. Research-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction: A literature review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14, 1 (2015), es3.
Robert K Yin. 2001. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. Bookman editora.
Daniel Zingaro. 2010. Experience Report: Peer Instruction in Remedial Computer Science. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Vol. 2010. 5030–5035.
Daniel Zingaro and Leo Porter. 2014. Peer Instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention. Computers & Education, 71 (2014), 87 – 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.015
Publicado
26/04/2021
Como Citar
BISPO JR., Esdras Lins; LOPES, Rosemara Perpetua.
Impacto do Uso da Peer Instruction no Ensino Superior de Lógica para Computação no Brasil. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE EDUCAÇÃO EM COMPUTAÇÃO (EDUCOMP), 1. , 2021, On-line.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2021
.
p. 72-82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/educomp.2021.14473.
