Cidades Inteligentes: Uma arquitetura de Gerenciamento Autonômica no Contexto de IoT

  • Pablo Tibúrcio UFPE
  • Marcelo Santos UFPE
  • Stênio Fernandes UFPE

Resumo


O gerenciamento de infraestrutura de redes é uma atividade fundamental para a manutenção da rede e da qualidade dos serviços providos por ela. Este gerenciamento tem se tornado bastante complexo e custoso à medida que as redes ficam maiores e mais heterogêneas. Desta forma, os custos com o gerenciamento aumentam e a possibilidade de erros humanos também. Um ambiente que oferece esses desafios é a Internet of Things (IoT). O gerenciamento na IoT envolve além da infraestrutura de rede, o gerenciamento de seus nós (dispositivos finais). Cidade Inteligente (CI) é outro ambiente como esses desafios de gerenciamento pois ele engloba a IoT, no entanto, é ainda mais complexo devido a sua grande escala eúnico domínio administrativo. Neste contexto, mecanismos tradicionais de gerencia de redes e dispositivos não são eficientes. Assim, esse trabalho propõe AutoManIoT, uma solução arquitetural de gerenciamento autonômico de rede e de dispositivos para o cenário de IoT e CIs. A arquitetura utiliza uma abordagem de provisionamento dinâmico e elástico dos serviços de rede através das tecnologias Redes Definidas por Software (SDN) e Virtualização de Funções de Rede (NFV). Essas tecnologias permitem melhorar a eficiência do controle e da operação da rede e ainda aproximar o gerenciamento da rede dos requisitos da aplicação.

Referências

Agoulmine, N. (2011). Autonomic Network Management Principles: From Concepts to Applications. Elsevier, Burlington, MA.

Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, Supplement 1:S3 – S11. Current Research on Cities.

Ashton, K. (2009). That ’internet of things’ thing. [link]. Accessed: 2016-03-20.

Atzori, L., Iera, A., and Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15):2787 – 2805.

Behringer, M., Pritikin, M., Bjarnason, S., Clemm, A., Carpenter, B., Jiang, S., and Ciavaglia, L. (2015). Autonomic networking: Definitions and design goals. Technical Report 7575, IETF.

Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications, 54:1 – 31.

Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and Davin, J. (1990). Simple network management protocol (snmp). Technical Report 1157, IETF.

Chaparadza, R., Menem, T. B., Strassner, J., Radier, B., Soulhi, S., Ding, J., and Yan, Z. (2014). Industry harmonization for unified standards on autonomic management & control (amc) of networks and services, sdn and nfv. In 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pages 155–160.

Clayman, S. and Galis, A. (2011). Inox: A managed service platform for inter-connected smart objects. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Internet of Things and Service Platforms, IoTSP ’11, pages 2:1–2:8, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

Dobson, S., Denazis, S., Fernández, A., Gaïti, D., Gelenbe, E., Massacci, F., Nixon, P., Saffre, F., Schmidt, N., and Zambonelli, F. (2006). A survey of autonomic communications. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst., 1(2):223–259.

Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., and Bierman, A. (2011). Network configuration protocol (netconf). Technical Report 6241, IETF. Updated by RFC 7803.

ETSI (2013). Network functions virtualization (nfv); architecture framework. Technical report, ETSI GS NFV 002 v1.1.1.

Farhady, H., Lee, H., and Nakao, A. (2015). Software-defined networking: A survey. Computer Networks, 81:79 – 95.

Gama, K., Touseau, L., and Donsez, D. (2012). Combining heterogeneous service technologies for building an internet of things middleware. Comput. Commun., 35(4):405–417.

Hakiri, A., Berthou, P., Gokhale, A., and Abdellatif, S. (2015). Publish/subscribe-enabled software defined networking for efficient and scalable iot communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(9):48–54.

Han, B., Gopalakrishnan, V., Ji, L., and Lee, S. (2015). Network function virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(2):90–97.

Horn, P. (2001). Autonomic computing: Ibm\’s perspective on the state of information technology. Manifesto.

Kephart, J. O. and Chess, D. M. (2003). The vision of autonomic computing. Computer, 36(1):41–50.

Klas, G., Rodermund, F., Shelby, Z., Akhouri, S., and Höller, J. (2014). Lightweight m2m: Enabling device management and applications for the internet of things. Technical report, White Paper.

Li, S., Xu, L., Wang, X., and Wang, J. (2012). Integration of hybrid wireless networks in cloud services oriented enterprise information systems. Enterprise Information Systems, 6(2):165–187.

Li, S., Xu, L. D., and Zhao, S. (2015). The internet of things: A survey. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2):243–259.

McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., and Turner, J. (2008). Openflow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 38(2):69–74.

Movahedi, Z., Ayari, M., Langar, R., and Pujolle, G. (2012). A survey of autonomic network architectures and evaluation criteria. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 14(2):464–490.

Nam, T. and Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, dg.o ’11, pages 282–291, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., and Morris, R. (2011). Smarter cities and their innovation challenges. Computer, 44(6):32–39.

Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X. N., Obraczka, K., and Turletti, T. (2014). A survey of software-defined networking: Past, present, and future of programmable networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 16(3):1617–1634.

Pan, G., Qi, G., Zhang, W., Li, S., Wu, Z., and Yang, L. T. (2013). Trace analysis and mining for smart cities: issues, methods, and applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(6):120–126.

Qi, Q., Wang, W., Gong, X., and Que, X. (2014). A sdn-based network virtualization architecture with autonomie management. In 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pages 178–182.

Rathore, M. M., Ahmad, A., Paul, A., and Rho, S. (2016). Urban planning and building smart cities based on the internet of things using big data analytics. Computer Networks, 101:63 – 80. Industrial Technologies and Applications for the Internet of Things.

Savaglio, C. and Fortino, G. (2015). Autonomic and Cognitive Architectures for the Internet of Things, chapter 1, pages 39–47. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Sehgal, A., Perelman, V., Kuryla, S., and Schonwalder, J. (2012). Management of resource constrained devices in the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(12):144–149.

Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P. K., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., Viljoen, N., Miller, M., and Rao, N. (2013). Are we ready for sdn? implementation challenges for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7):36–43.

Strassner, J., Agoulmine, N., and Lehtihet, E. (2006). Focale: A novel autonomic networking architecture. In Latin American Autonomic Computing Symposium (LAACS), Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.

Waldbusser, S. (2006). Remote network monitoring management information base version 2. Technical Report 4502, IETF.

Wendong, W., Yannan, H. U., Que, X., and Xiangyang, G. (2012). Autonomicity design in openflow based software defined networking. In 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops, pages 818–823.

Yovanof, G. S. and Hazapis, G. N. (2009). An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 49(3):445–463.

Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., and Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1):22–32.
Publicado
02/07/2017
TIBÚRCIO, Pablo; SANTOS, Marcelo; FERNANDES, Stênio. Cidades Inteligentes: Uma arquitetura de Gerenciamento Autonômica no Contexto de IoT. In: WORKSHOP PRÉ-IETF (WPIETF), 4. , 2017, São Paulo. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2017 . p. 306-320. ISSN 2595-6388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wpietf.2017.3607.