Análise temporal da relação orientador-orientado: um estudo de caso sobre a produtividade dos pesquisadores doutores da área de Ciência da Computação
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta um estudo da relações acadêmica temporal entre orientador e orientado, para um conjunto de pesquisadores doutores da área de Ciência da Computação com currículos cadastrados na plataforma Lattes. Analisamos as principais características do grupo e suas relações de coautoria. Observamos que o tempo de duração da coautoria, que se estabelece entre orientador e orientado, pode extrapolar o período formal de orientação, e, além disso, mostramos que a duração do tempo de colaboração, na forma de coautoria, correlaciona-se com o número de artigos em revistas, publicadas pelo orientado.
Referências
Anwar, M. (2004). From doctoral dissertation to publication. a study of 1995 American graduates in library and information science. Journal of Librarian and Information Science, 36 (4):151–157.
Arriola-Quiroz, I.and Curioso, W., Cruz-Encarnacion, M., and Gayoso, O. (2010). Characteristics and publication pattern of theses from a Peruvian medical school. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 27:148–154.
Digiampietri, L. A., Mena-Chalco, J. P., Pérez-Alcázar, J. J., Tuesta, E. F., Delgado, K. V., Mugnaini, R., and Silva, G. S. (2012). Minerando e caracterizando dados de currículos lattes. In Proceedings of BraSNAM 2012.
Frkovic, V., Skender, T., and Dojcinovic, B. (2003). Publishing scientific papers based on masterís and Ph.D. theses from a small community: case study Croatian medical schools. Croatian Medical Journal, 44(1):107–111.
Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 23(2):199–227.
Kam, B. H. (1997). Style and quality in research supervision: the supervisor dependency factor. Higher Education, 34(1):81–103.
Lariviere, V. (2010). On the shoulders of students? the contribution of Ph.D. students to the advancement of knowledge. 11th International Conference on STI ”Creating Value for Users”. Leiden, Netherlands.
Lee, W. M. (2000). Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2):139–144.
Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., and de Sompel, H. V. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Inf. Process. Manage., 41(6):1462–1480.
Mainhard, T., van der Rijst, R., van Tartwijk, J., and Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58(3):359–373.
Mallette, L. (2006). Publishing rates of graduates education Ph.D. and Ed.D. students: a longitudinal study of University of California schools. (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3239922).
Marsh, H. W., Rowe, K. J., and Martin, A. (2002). Ph.D. students? evaluations of research supervision. Higher Education, 73(3):313–348.
McAlpine, L. and Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1):3–17.
Mena-Chalco, J. P. and Cesar-Jr., R. M. (2009). scriptLattes: An open-source knowledge extraction system from the lattes platform. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 15(4):31–39.
Mena-Chalco, J. P. and Cesar-Jr., R. M. (2011). Towards automatic discovery of coauthorship networks in the brazilian academic areas. In IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops 2011 (eScienceW), pages 53–60. IEEE. (Workshop On Measuring the Impact of e-Science Research – MeSR 2011).
Mugnaini, R., Igami, M. P. Z., and Bressiani, J. C. (2011). Productivity and doctoral research in a Brazilian Nuclear Research institution: validating co-word analysis technique. Proceedings of the ISSI 2011 Conference. Durban : University of Zululand Reprographic and Printing Centre, 2011., v.II:1037–1039.
Myers, J. L. and Well, A. D. (2003). Research Design and Statistical Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2nd edition.
Población, D., Mugnaini, R., and Ramos, L. (2009). Redes sociais e colaborativas em informação científica. Angellara Editoras, São Paulo, 1st edition.
Ramos, P., Furtado, E., Carvalho, E., Campos, M., Cortes de Souza, D., Almeida, L., and de Araujo, C. (2009). Dissertações e Teses de Pós Graduação geram publicação de artigos científicos? análise baseada em 3 programas da área de educação física. Brazilian Journal Biomotricity, 3(4):315–324.
Sacardo, M. and Hayashi, M. C. (2011). Balanço bibliométrico da produção científica em Educação Física e Educação Especial oriunda de teses e dissertações. RBPG Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, 8(15):111–135.
Salmi, L., Gana, S., and Mouillet, E. (2001). Publication pattern of medical theses, france 1993-98. Medical Education, 35(1):18–21.
Wang, C., Han, J., Jia, Y., Tang, J., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., and Guo, J. (2010). Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks. In Knowledge Data Discovery (KDD), pages 203–212.
Wang, C., Han, J., Li, Q., Li, X., Lin, W.-P., and Ji, H. (2012). Learning hierarchical relationships among partially ordered objects with heterogeneous attributes and links. In Proceedings of 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining.
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). Cambridge University Press, 1 edition.
Wu, T., Chen, Y., and Han, J. (2007). Association mining in large databases: A reexamination of its measures. In PKDD, pages 621–628.
Wu, T., Chen, Y., and Han, J. (2010). Re-examination of interestingness measures in pattern mining: a unified framework. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 21(3):371–397.