Maturity Model in Organizational Transparency: A Pilot Study in Public Organization focusing on Disclosure Issues
Abstract
organizational transparency is to establish the characteristics that must be present in the processes and organizational information in order to make them transparent. This article describes the first stage with which an organization must be aligned to follow a path of maturity in transparency. This stage is represented by the Maturity Model Level 2 in Organizational Transparency, which brings together the features and practices to be implemented in an organization in order to make it disclosed (2nd. Maturity level of the model). The article also describes, by way of an example, the definitions of this level can be used to implement this scenario and displays a model of the application at a public organization.
Keywords:
electronic government
References
Barrat, A., Barthélemy M., Pastor-Satorras R., Vespignani, A. (2004) The architecture of Complex Weighted Networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, March 16, vol. 101,n. 11, pp 3747-3752
Balijepalli, Chandra, Oppong, Olivia (2014) Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas, Journal of Transport Geography, 39, pp. 145-155.
Borgatti, Stephen P. (2005) Centrality and network flow, Social networks ,27, pp. 55- 71.
Chen, Bi Yu, Lam Willian H. K., Sumalee, A., Li, Qingquan, Li, Zhi-Chun (2012) Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46.3, pp. 501-516
Easley, D., Jon K. (2010) “Networks, Crowds, and Markets”, Vol. 8, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Ferber, C., Berche, B., Holovatch, T., Holovatch Yu. (2012) A tale of Two Cities Vulnerabilities of the London and Paris Transit Networks, J Transp. Secur. 5. 199/216.
Hagberg, A., Swart, P., Chult, D. (2008) “Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX”. in Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), pp. 11-15.
Jenelius, E., Mattsson L-G. (2015) Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems — A discussion of recent research, Transportation Research Part 4, 81, pp. 16-34.
Joanes, D. N., Gill, C. A. (1998). Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 47, pp. 183-189.
Latora, V., Marchiori, M. (2001) Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical review letters 87.19, pp.198701.
Nist (2003), “Engineering Statistics Hanbook”, https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35b.htm
Pearson, M., Sagastuy, J., Samaniego, S. (2017) “Traffic Flow Analysis Using Uber Movement Data”, htts:// snap.stanford.edu/class/projects/
Saramãki, J., Kivel, M., Onnela, J-P., Kaskil, K., Kertész, J. (2007) Generalizations of the Clustering Coefficient to Weighted Complex Networks, Physical Review E, 75.2,pp. 027105.
Sebastiani, M., Luders R., Fonseca K. (2016) “Evaluating electric bus operation for a real-world BRT public transportation using simulation optimization,” IEEE Trans. Intel. Transp. Sys., vol. 99, pp. 1-10.
Uber (2019) “Uber Movement”, https://movement.uber.com/
Vonu P., Tang L., Vassilakis W. (2011) “Spatio-temporal effects of bus arrival time information,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshopon Computational Transportation Science, CTS "11, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 6-11.
Balijepalli, Chandra, Oppong, Olivia (2014) Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas, Journal of Transport Geography, 39, pp. 145-155.
Borgatti, Stephen P. (2005) Centrality and network flow, Social networks ,27, pp. 55- 71.
Chen, Bi Yu, Lam Willian H. K., Sumalee, A., Li, Qingquan, Li, Zhi-Chun (2012) Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46.3, pp. 501-516
Easley, D., Jon K. (2010) “Networks, Crowds, and Markets”, Vol. 8, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Ferber, C., Berche, B., Holovatch, T., Holovatch Yu. (2012) A tale of Two Cities Vulnerabilities of the London and Paris Transit Networks, J Transp. Secur. 5. 199/216.
Hagberg, A., Swart, P., Chult, D. (2008) “Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX”. in Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), pp. 11-15.
Jenelius, E., Mattsson L-G. (2015) Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems — A discussion of recent research, Transportation Research Part 4, 81, pp. 16-34.
Joanes, D. N., Gill, C. A. (1998). Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 47, pp. 183-189.
Latora, V., Marchiori, M. (2001) Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical review letters 87.19, pp.198701.
Nist (2003), “Engineering Statistics Hanbook”, https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35b.htm
Pearson, M., Sagastuy, J., Samaniego, S. (2017) “Traffic Flow Analysis Using Uber Movement Data”, htts:// snap.stanford.edu/class/projects/
Saramãki, J., Kivel, M., Onnela, J-P., Kaskil, K., Kertész, J. (2007) Generalizations of the Clustering Coefficient to Weighted Complex Networks, Physical Review E, 75.2,pp. 027105.
Sebastiani, M., Luders R., Fonseca K. (2016) “Evaluating electric bus operation for a real-world BRT public transportation using simulation optimization,” IEEE Trans. Intel. Transp. Sys., vol. 99, pp. 1-10.
Uber (2019) “Uber Movement”, https://movement.uber.com/
Vonu P., Tang L., Vassilakis W. (2011) “Spatio-temporal effects of bus arrival time information,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshopon Computational Transportation Science, CTS "11, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 6-11.
Published
2013-05-22
How to Cite
ARAUJO, Renata Mendes de; ENGIEL, Priscila; CAPPELLI, Claudia; TANAKA, Asterio; SANTOS, Gleison; LEITE, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado; MORAES, Miriam; NUNES, Vanessa.
Maturity Model in Organizational Transparency: A Pilot Study in Public Organization focusing on Disclosure Issues. In: LATIN AMERICAN SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT (LASDIGOV), 5. , 2013, João Pessoa.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2013
.
p. 9-16.
ISSN 2763-8723.
