A Study on the Effects of Reputation-based Decision on the Dynamics of Public Goods Game with Punishment, Signaling and Gossiping Mechanisms

  • Mariana R. Mendoza UFRGS
  • Ana L. C. Bazzan UFRGS

Resumo


In public goods game individuals contribute in favor of a common benefit. However this attracts free-riders, who profit the benefits generated by the group regardless their contribution decision. Although one would expect a cooperation collapse within a rational society, what is observed, in fact, is the emergence of cooperation. In the present work we not only address mechanisms such as punishment, signaling, and gossiping, but also add reputation-based decision-making to the process. We show that the dynamics of public goods game changes with the inclusion of the latter mechanism. Specifically, a decrease in the average wealth and contribution is observed because agents tend to be more selective. This holds a similarity with real-world situations: Human beings do act based on reputation about their partners.

Referências

Bazzan, A. L. C. and Dahmen, S. R. (2010). Bribe and punishment: Effects of signaling, gossiping, and bribery in public goods games. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(6):755–771.

Bergstrom, T. (2002). Evolution of social behavior: Individual and group selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2):67–78.

Brandt, H., Hauert, C., and Sigmund, K. (2003). Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. Proc Biol Sci, 270(1519):1099–1104.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New York. 224 pp.

Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2):169–179.

Gintis, H., Smith, E. A. L. D. E. N., and Bowles, S. (2001). Costly signaling and cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 213(1):103–119.

Gürek, O., Irlenbusch, B., and Rockenbach, B. (2006). The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science, 312(5770):108–111.

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetic evolution of social behavior ii. J Theoretical Biology, 7(1):17–52.

Henrich, J. (2006). Cooperation, punishment, and the evolution of human institutions. Science, 312(5770):60–61.

Mui, L., Halberstadt, A., and Mohtashemi, M. (2003). Evaluating reputation in multi-agents systems. In Proc. of the AAMAS, number 2631 in LNAI, pages 123–137.

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805):1560–1563.

Nowak, M. A. and May, R. M. (1992). Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature, 359:826–829.
Publicado
19/07/2011
MENDOZA, Mariana R.; BAZZAN, Ana L. C.. A Study on the Effects of Reputation-based Decision on the Dynamics of Public Goods Game with Punishment, Signaling and Gossiping Mechanisms. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E COMPUTACIONAL (ENIAC), 8. , 2011, Natal/RN. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2011 . p. 500-511. ISSN 2763-9061.

Artigos mais lidos do(s) mesmo(s) autor(es)