Mapeamento sistemático da literatura de relatos do uso do orçamento participativo na forma digital
Resumo
O OP (Orçamento Participativo) é um dos dispositivos criados para assegurar a participação da população na definição de metas relacionadas às receitas e despesas do exercício financeiro. Esse artigo propõe um mapeamento sistemático dos relatos de uso da tecnologia como intervenção para elaboração do OP. Foram encontrados 127 artigos, tendo sido selecionados 26 trabalhos para a extração de dados. As experiências de utilização do OP na forma digital encontradas apresentam uma distribuição geográfica heterogênea, sendo realizadas em paralelo com a forma presencial. Os resultados encontrados podem contribuir para o estado da arte das implementações de OP digital, fornecendo uma visão geral das diversas formas de implementações relatadas na literatura.
Palavras-chave:
Orçamento Participativo Digital, Engajamento Cidadão, Governança Eletrônica, Orçamento Público
Referências
ABREU, J. C. (2012). Participação democrática na administração pública mediada pela internet: O caso do orçamento participativo digital.
AIKENS, G. (1998). A democracia eletrônica. Cadernos da escola do legislativo, Belo Horizonte, pages 41–101.
Bardovic, J. and Gasparík, J. (2021). Enablers of participatory budgeting in Slovakia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(1).
Barros, S. A. R. and Sampaio, R. C. (2016). Do Citizens Trust Electronic Participatory Budgeting? Public Expression in Online Forums as an Evaluation Method in Belo Horizonte. Policy and Internet, 8(3):292–312.
Bonavides, P. (2000). Ciência política, volume 10.
Coleman, S. and Cardoso Sampaio, R. (2017). Sustaining a democratic innovation: a study of three e-participatory budgets in Belo Horizonte. Information Communication and Society, 20(5):754–769.
Cunha, M., Coelho, T. R., and Pozzebon, M. (2014). Internet and participation: The case of digital participatory budgeting in Belo Horizonte [Internet e participação: O caso do orçamento participativo digital de belo horizonte]. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 54(3):296–308.
de Abreu, J. C. A. and de Pinho, J. A. G. (2014). Senses and meanings of the democratic participation through the internet: An analysis of the experience of digital participatory budget. Revista de Administracao Publica, 48(4):821–846.
Ertiö, T.-P., Tuominen, P., and Rask, M. (2019). Turning Ideas into Proposals: A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11686 LNCS:15–25.
Legard, S. and Goldfrank, B. (2021). The Systemic Turn and Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Rio Grande do sul. Journal of Latin American Studies, 53(1):161–187.
Levenda, A. M., Keough, N., Rock, M., and Miller, B. (2020). Rethinking public participation in the smart city. Canadian Geographer, 64(3):344–358.
Lim, S. and Oh, Y. (2016). Online versus offline participation: Has the democratic potential of the internet been realized? Analysis of a participatory budgeting system in Korea. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(3):676–700.
M. B. D. D. Silva, R. P. C. D. Nascimento, I. D. N. and Nunes, M. A. S. N. (2017). Iniciativas nacionais de governança de tic que sugerem modelos, técnicas e boas praticas para a administração publica federal: um mapeamento sistemático. iSys Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação, 10(1):p. 39–51.
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., Vaz, J. C., and De Souza, C. A. (2010a). Case studies of digital participatory budgeting in Latin America Models for citizen engagement. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 31–36.
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., Vaz, J. C., and De Souza, C. A. (2010b). Internet use for social control and participation: What are local governments doing in Latin America? In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 333–338.
Mellon, J., Peixoto, T., and Sjoberg, F. M. (2017). Does online voting change the outcome? Evidence from a multi-mode public policy referendum. Electoral Studies, 47:13–24.
Mkude, C. G., Pérez-Espés, C., and Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Participatory budgeting: A framework to analyze the value-add of citizen participation. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 2054–2062.
Olejniczak, J. and Bednarska-Olejniczak, D. (2015). Participation of Non-Resident Students in the Creation of Participatory Budget in Wroclaw. In Prochazka, D., editor, 16TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, ACFA PRAGUE 2015, volume 25 of Procedia Economics and Finance, pages 579–589, SARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS. Univ Econ, Fac Finance \& Accounting; Univ Econ, Internal Sci Fdn, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV.
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., and Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, volume 8, pages 68–77.
Pozzebon, M., Cunha, M. A., and Coelho, T. R. (2016). Making sense to decreasing citizen eParticipation through a social representation lens. Information and Organization, 26(3):84–99.
Raffael C. Carvalho, M. M. V. P. (2021). Tabulação da extração dos dados. [link].
Rocha Barros, S. A. and Sampaio, R. C. (2017). TRUST FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF A DEMOCRATIC INNOVATION: THE PARTICIPATORY BUDGET IN BELO HORIZONTE. CADERNOS GESTAO PUBLICA E CIDADANIA, 22(72):151–172.
Ruesch, M. A. and Märker, O. (2012). Making the case for anonymity in e-participation1 an evaluation of real name policy in gütersloh’s second participatory budget. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4(2):301–317.
Rumbul, R., Parsons, A., and Bramley, J. (2018). Elite Capture and Co-optation in Participatory Budgeting in Mexico City. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11021 LNCS:89–99.
Sampaio, R. C., Maia, R. C. M., and Marques, F. (2010). Participação e deliberação na internet: Um estudo de caso do Orçamento participativo digital de belo horizonte. Opiniao Publica, 16(2):446–477.
Scherer, S. and Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Trust in e-participation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM.
Shin, B. and Rask, M. (2021). Assessment of online deliberative quality: New indicators using network analysis and time-series analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3):1–21.
Sousa, A. A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L. B., and Abrantes, S. (2018). Liberopinion a web platform for public participation. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 199–208.
Spada, P., Mellon, J., Peixoto, T., and Sjoberg, F. M. (2016). Effects of the internet on participation: Study of a public policy referendum in Brazil. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 13(3):187–207.
Stortone, S. and De Cindio, F. (2014). BiPart”of participatory budgeting. A software platform for new political practices. Innovation and the Public Sector, 21:30–39.
Stortone, S. and De Cindio, F. (2015). Hybrid participatory budgeting: Local democratic practices in the digital era.
Stortone, S. and De Cindio, F. (2016). Styles of online participation in the monza participatory budgeting. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, pages 17–24.
Zepic, R., Dapp, M., and Krcmar, H. (2017). Participatory budgeting without participants: Identifying barriers on accessibility and usage of german participatory budgeting. In 2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM). IEEE.
Zolotov, M. N., Oliveira, T., and Casteleyn, S. (2018). Continued intention to use online participatory budgeting: The effect of empowerment and habit. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 209–216.
AIKENS, G. (1998). A democracia eletrônica. Cadernos da escola do legislativo, Belo Horizonte, pages 41–101.
Bardovic, J. and Gasparík, J. (2021). Enablers of participatory budgeting in Slovakia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(1).
Barros, S. A. R. and Sampaio, R. C. (2016). Do Citizens Trust Electronic Participatory Budgeting? Public Expression in Online Forums as an Evaluation Method in Belo Horizonte. Policy and Internet, 8(3):292–312.
Bonavides, P. (2000). Ciência política, volume 10.
Coleman, S. and Cardoso Sampaio, R. (2017). Sustaining a democratic innovation: a study of three e-participatory budgets in Belo Horizonte. Information Communication and Society, 20(5):754–769.
Cunha, M., Coelho, T. R., and Pozzebon, M. (2014). Internet and participation: The case of digital participatory budgeting in Belo Horizonte [Internet e participação: O caso do orçamento participativo digital de belo horizonte]. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 54(3):296–308.
de Abreu, J. C. A. and de Pinho, J. A. G. (2014). Senses and meanings of the democratic participation through the internet: An analysis of the experience of digital participatory budget. Revista de Administracao Publica, 48(4):821–846.
Ertiö, T.-P., Tuominen, P., and Rask, M. (2019). Turning Ideas into Proposals: A Case for Blended Participation During the Participatory Budgeting Trial in Helsinki. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11686 LNCS:15–25.
Legard, S. and Goldfrank, B. (2021). The Systemic Turn and Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Rio Grande do sul. Journal of Latin American Studies, 53(1):161–187.
Levenda, A. M., Keough, N., Rock, M., and Miller, B. (2020). Rethinking public participation in the smart city. Canadian Geographer, 64(3):344–358.
Lim, S. and Oh, Y. (2016). Online versus offline participation: Has the democratic potential of the internet been realized? Analysis of a participatory budgeting system in Korea. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(3):676–700.
M. B. D. D. Silva, R. P. C. D. Nascimento, I. D. N. and Nunes, M. A. S. N. (2017). Iniciativas nacionais de governança de tic que sugerem modelos, técnicas e boas praticas para a administração publica federal: um mapeamento sistemático. iSys Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação, 10(1):p. 39–51.
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., Vaz, J. C., and De Souza, C. A. (2010a). Case studies of digital participatory budgeting in Latin America Models for citizen engagement. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 31–36.
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., Vaz, J. C., and De Souza, C. A. (2010b). Internet use for social control and participation: What are local governments doing in Latin America? In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 333–338.
Mellon, J., Peixoto, T., and Sjoberg, F. M. (2017). Does online voting change the outcome? Evidence from a multi-mode public policy referendum. Electoral Studies, 47:13–24.
Mkude, C. G., Pérez-Espés, C., and Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Participatory budgeting: A framework to analyze the value-add of citizen participation. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 2054–2062.
Olejniczak, J. and Bednarska-Olejniczak, D. (2015). Participation of Non-Resident Students in the Creation of Participatory Budget in Wroclaw. In Prochazka, D., editor, 16TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, ACFA PRAGUE 2015, volume 25 of Procedia Economics and Finance, pages 579–589, SARA BURGERHARTSTRAAT 25, PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS. Univ Econ, Fac Finance \& Accounting; Univ Econ, Internal Sci Fdn, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV.
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., and Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, volume 8, pages 68–77.
Pozzebon, M., Cunha, M. A., and Coelho, T. R. (2016). Making sense to decreasing citizen eParticipation through a social representation lens. Information and Organization, 26(3):84–99.
Raffael C. Carvalho, M. M. V. P. (2021). Tabulação da extração dos dados. [link].
Rocha Barros, S. A. and Sampaio, R. C. (2017). TRUST FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF A DEMOCRATIC INNOVATION: THE PARTICIPATORY BUDGET IN BELO HORIZONTE. CADERNOS GESTAO PUBLICA E CIDADANIA, 22(72):151–172.
Ruesch, M. A. and Märker, O. (2012). Making the case for anonymity in e-participation1 an evaluation of real name policy in gütersloh’s second participatory budget. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4(2):301–317.
Rumbul, R., Parsons, A., and Bramley, J. (2018). Elite Capture and Co-optation in Participatory Budgeting in Mexico City. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11021 LNCS:89–99.
Sampaio, R. C., Maia, R. C. M., and Marques, F. (2010). Participação e deliberação na internet: Um estudo de caso do Orçamento participativo digital de belo horizonte. Opiniao Publica, 16(2):446–477.
Scherer, S. and Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Trust in e-participation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM.
Shin, B. and Rask, M. (2021). Assessment of online deliberative quality: New indicators using network analysis and time-series analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3):1–21.
Sousa, A. A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L. B., and Abrantes, S. (2018). Liberopinion a web platform for public participation. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 199–208.
Spada, P., Mellon, J., Peixoto, T., and Sjoberg, F. M. (2016). Effects of the internet on participation: Study of a public policy referendum in Brazil. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 13(3):187–207.
Stortone, S. and De Cindio, F. (2014). BiPart”of participatory budgeting. A software platform for new political practices. Innovation and the Public Sector, 21:30–39.
Stortone, S. and De Cindio, F. (2015). Hybrid participatory budgeting: Local democratic practices in the digital era.
Stortone, S. and De Cindio, F. (2016). Styles of online participation in the monza participatory budgeting. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, pages 17–24.
Zepic, R., Dapp, M., and Krcmar, H. (2017). Participatory budgeting without participants: Identifying barriers on accessibility and usage of german participatory budgeting. In 2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM). IEEE.
Zolotov, M. N., Oliveira, T., and Casteleyn, S. (2018). Continued intention to use online participatory budgeting: The effect of empowerment and habit. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pages 209–216.
Publicado
31/07/2022
Como Citar
PAULA, Melise M. V.; CARVALHO, Raffael C..
Mapeamento sistemático da literatura de relatos do uso do orçamento participativo na forma digital. In: WORKSHOP DE COMPUTAÇÃO APLICADA EM GOVERNO ELETRÔNICO (WCGE), 10. , 2022, Niterói.
Anais [...].
Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação,
2022
.
p. 49-60.
ISSN 2763-8723.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/wcge.2022.223258.
