Recuperação do Serviço de Pelotão de Veículos Autônomos e Conectados Baseado em Modelos Virtuais Contra Ataques na Rede e Sensores

• Everaldo Andrade UFMG
• Aldri Santos UFMG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbrc.2022.222366

Abstract

Platoon formation of autonomous and connected vehicles (CAVs) is the most common topological structure of CAVs, where vehicles travel relatively close together, responding to the leader's commands and providing autonomous and intelligent transport services. However, with the evolution of CAV platoons, various types of attacks that inject false data into networks and sensors have compromised platoon stability, resulting in fragmentation or, in the worst case, serious collisions. This work proposes a mechanism, called PReCAV, for the cooperative recovery of CAVs platoon against false data injection attacks, supported by virtual and physical models of the system, in order to maintain resilience in the midst of network and sensor attacks. A simulation evaluation showed that PReCAV maintained the stability of the platoon by providing resilience, depriving it of variations of 4.42m/s² of acceleration, 13m/s of speed and 40m of distance between vehicles in attacks in the network and variations of 4.43m/s², 10.7m/s and 33.4m in sensor attacks.

References

Amoozadeh, M. et al. (2015). Platoon management with cooperative adaptive cruise control enabled by vanet. Vehicular Communications, 2(2):110–123.

Back, J., Choi, S., and Shin, Y. (2019). A study on the election of suitable leader vehicle in vehicle platooning using the raft algorithm. In 2019 Eleventh ICUFN, pages 756–761.

Bang, S. and Ahn, S. (2017). Platooning strategy for connected and autonomous vehicles: Transition from light traffic. Transportation Research Record, 2623(1):73–81.

Böhm, A. and Kunert, K. (2016). Data age based mac scheme for fast and reliable communication within and between platoons of vehicles. In 2016 IEEE 12th (WiMob), pages 1–9.

Chen, Q., Tang, S., Yang, Q., and Fu, S. (2019). Cooper: Cooperative perception for connected autonomous vehicles based on 3d point clouds. In 2019 IEEE 39th ICDCS, pages 514–524.

Choi, H. et al. (2018). Detecting attacks against robotic vehicles: A control invariant approach. CCS ’18, page 801–816, New York, NY, USA.

Choi, H. et al. (2020). Software-based realtime recovery from sensor attacks on robotic vehicles. In 23rd RAID 2020, pages 349–364, San Sebastian. USENIX Association.

Fakhfakh, F., Tounsi, M., and Mosbah, M. (2020). Vehicle platooning systems: Review, classification and validation strategies. IJNDC, 8:203–213.

Fernandes, P. and Nunes, U. (2012). Platooning with ivc-enabled autonomous vehicles: Strategies to mitigate communication delays, improve safety and traffic flow. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1):91–106.

He, Q. et al. (2020). Towards a severity assessment method for potential cyber attacks to connected and autonomous vehicles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020:6873273.

Junejo, K. N. and Goh, J. (2016). Behaviour-based attack detection and classification in cyber physical systems using machine learning. In 2nd ACM Interntional Workshop on CPSS, page 34–43, New York, NY, USA.

Khan, M. A. et al. (2022). Level-5 autonomous driving—are we there yet? a review of research literature. ACM Comput. Surv., 55(2).

Ko, B. and Son, S. H. (2021). An approach to detecting malicious information attacks for platoon safety. IEEE Access, 9:101289–101299.

Maiti, S., Winter, S., Kulik, L., and Sarkar, S. (2020). The impact of flexible platoon formation operations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 5(2):229–239.

Mitchell, R. et al. (2015). Behavior rule specification-based intrusion detection for safety critical medical cyber physical systems. IEEE Trans. on Depend. and Secure Computing, 12(1):16–30.

Morando, M. M. et al. (2018). Studying the safety impact of autonomous vehicles using simulation-based surrogate safety measures. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018.

Mushtaq, A., Haq, I. u., Nabi, W. u., Khan, A., and Shafiq, O. (2021). Traffic flow management of autonomous vehicles using platooning and collision avoidance strategies. Electronics, 10(10).

Onishi, H. (2018). A survey: Engineering challenges to implement vanet security. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), pages 1–6.

Rana, M. M. and Hossain, K. (2021). Connected and autonomous vehicles and infrastructures: A literature review. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology.

Shoukry, Y. et al. (2013). Non-invasive spoofing attacks for anti-lock braking systems. In Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems CHES 2013, pages 55–72, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Sun, G. et al. (2021). Strategic mitigation against wireless attacks on autonomous platoons. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Applied Data Science Track, pages 69–84, Cham. Springer International Publishing.

Tippenhauer, N. O. et al. (2011). On the requirements for successful gps spoofing attacks. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM CCCS, CCS ’11, page 75–86, New York, NY, USA.

Trippel, T. et al. (2017). Walnut: Waging doubt on the integrity of mems accelerometers with acoustic injection attacks. In 2017 IEEE EuroS P, pages 3–18.

Yang, T. and Lv, C. (2021). A secure sensor fusion framework for connected and automated vehicles under sensor attacks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, pages 1–1.

Yao, S. et al. (2020). Managing connected automated vehicles in mixed traffic considering communication reliability: a platooning strategy. Transportation Research Procedia, 47:43–50. 22nd EWGT 2019, Barcelona, Spain.