Alternative Representations of Business Process Models for Enhanced Understanding by People: A Systematic Mapping Study

• Tadeu Moreira de Classe UNIRIO http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9849-5133
• Ronney Moreira Castro UFJF https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-1824

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2025.246542

Resumo

Context: Business process models are essential resources in business process management approaches that allow people to understand how an organization works. With business process models, organizations can reflect on process improvements and bring innovation to their services and products. In this context, it is fundamental for the people involved in the organization to understand how the process is performed to avoid misunderstandings and losses. Problem: Although there are several ways to represent a business process model, it is challenging to find alternative representations apart from traditional approaches (graphical and textual) and identify non-traditional approaches, goals, advantages, disadvantages, audiences, etc. Solution: Therefore, in this paper, we explored how alternative representations of business process models are used to enhance people’s understanding. Method: We planned, described, and performed a systematic mapping of the literature (SML) for that. Summary Results: In the search step, we found 322 primary studies, but after a careful evaluation criteria analysis by peer review, we accepted only 23. The results point to several alternative business process model representations, highlighting the potential for enhancing people’s understanding. Additionally, we presented the advantages and disadvantages of alternative model representations related to specified audiences. Contributions to IS: Thus, this study brings contributions to the IS field by identifying aspects of alternative representations of business process models, which bring new ideas and reflections to explore new technological approaches to make organizational contexts more understandable and accessible for people. In addition, this research is aligned with the GranDSI-BR 2016-2026, once they approach innovative themes related to IS in an open and connected world.

Palavras-chave: Business process model, Alternative representation, Understanding, People, Alternative process model

Referências

Ruth Sara Aguilar-Savén. 2004. Business process modelling: Review and framework. International Journal of production economics 90, 2 (2004), 129–149.

Pedro Antunes, Jose A Pino, Mary Tate, and Alistair Barros. 2020. Eliciting process knowledge through process stories. Information Systems Frontiers 22, 5 (2020), 1179–1201.

Association of Business Process Management Professionals. 2013. BPM CBOK: business process management common body of knowledge (3.0 ed.). ABPMP, Lexington, KY.

Banu Aysolmaz, Farida Nur Cayhani, and Hajo A Reijers. 2022. Narration as a technique to improve process model comprehension: Tell me what I cannot see. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham, 407–422.

Banu Aysolmaz and Hajo A Reijers. 2017. Use cases for understanding business process models. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 29th International Conference, CAiSE 2017, Essen, Germany, June 12-16, 2017, Proceedings 29. Springer, Cham, 428–442.

Leonardo Guerreiro Azevedo, Raphael de Almeida Rodrigues, and Kate Revoredo. 2018. BPMN Model and Text Instructions Automatic Synchronization. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. ScitePress, Setúbal, 484–491.

Victor R Basili. 1992. Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm. Technical Report: University of Maryland UMIACS-TR-92-9, CS-TR-2956 (1992), 24.

Tony Benedict, Nancy Bilodeau, Phil Vitkus, Emmett Powell, Dan Morris, Marc Scarsig, Denis Lee, Gabrielle Field, Todd Lohr, Raju Saxena, Michael Fuller, and Jose Furlan. 2013. BPM CBOK Version 3.0: Guide to the Business Process Management Common Body of Knowledge (version 3.0, 1. ed.). ABPMP – Association of Business Process Management Professionals, St. Paul, MN.

Arystelene S Bitencourt, Debora MB Paiva, and Maria Istela Cagnin. 2016. Requirements elicitation from business process model in bpmn: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the XII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems on Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems in the Cloud Computing Era-Volume 1. ACM, New York, 200–207.

Maksym Bondarenko, Ihor Kudryk, Borys Levkovskyi, Matthias Utesch, and Helmut Krcmar. 2022. Learning by gaming: Improvement of User Experience of a Simulation Game for Teaching the Digital Transformation and its Administration Cockpit. In 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, New York, 1858–1867.

C. Boscarioli, R. M. Araujo, and R. S. P. Maciel. 2017. I GranDSI-BR – Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016-2026. Brazilian Computer Society (SBC), Rio Grande do Sul.

Luiz Paulo Carvalho, Claudia Cappelli, and Flávia Maria Santoro. 2020. BPMN pra GERAL, business process models in a citizen language. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 8 pages.

Luiz Paulo Carvalho, Claudia Cappelli, and Flavia Maria Santoro. 2022. BPMN pra GERAL: a framework to translate BPMN to a citizen language. Business Process Management Journal 28, 2 (2022), 508–531.

Ronney Castro, Tadeu Classe, and Cátia Castro. 2024. Business Process Modeling Concepts Using Paper Folding in the Organizational Aspects of Information Systems Course. In Proceedings of the 32nd Workshop on Computing Education (Brasília/DF). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 33–45.

Odette Chams-Anturi, Milton Soto-Ferrari, Anamaria Gomez, Juan Escorcia-Caballero, Daniel Romero-Rodriguez, and Maureen Casile. 2022. Acomprehensive business process management application to evaluate and improve the importations practices on big-box stores. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 15, 2 (2022), 164–173.

Tadeu Classe, Sean Siqueira, Renata Araujo, and Geraldo Xexéo. 2020. Play Your Process - A Digital Game Design Method Based on Business Process Models. In Proceedings of the 16th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems (Evento Online). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 142–157.

Tadeu Moreira Classe, Renata Mendes Araujo, and Geraldo Bonorino Xexéo. 2018. From Business Processes to Digital Games: A Mapping Proposal. In Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 59, 8 pages.

Renata Mendes de Araujo. 2017. Information Systems and the Open World Challenges. In I GranDSI-BR – Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016-2026, C. Boscarioli, R. M. Araujo, and R. S. P. Maciel (Eds.). Brazilian Computer Society (SBC), Porto Alegre, Chapter 4, 42–51.

Alberto De Ramon Fernandez, Daniel Ruiz Fernandez, and Yolanda Sabuco Garcia. 2020. Business Process Management for optimizing clinical processes: A systematic literature review. Health informatics journal 26, 2 (2020), 1305–1320.

Marlon Dumas, L Marcello Rosa, Jan Mendling, and A Hajo Reijers. 2018. Fundamentals of business process management. Springer, Cham.

Márcio Ferreira and Tadeu Classe. 2022. Narratives for Business Processes-based Digital Games: Systematic Mapping of the Literature. In Anais do XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (Curitiba). SBC, Porto Alegre, 1–9.

Márcio Rocha Ferreira, Tadeu Moreira de Classe, and Sean Wolfgand Matsui Siqueira. 2024. Web-based Interactive Narratives to Present Business Processes Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00049 1, 1 (2024), 1–18.

Kathrin Figl. 2017. Comprehension of procedural visual business process models: a literature review. Business & Information Systems Engineering 59 (2017), 41–67.

Florian Gallik, Michael Winter, Yusuf Kirikkayis, Rüdiger Pryss, and Manfred Reichert. 2021. DyVProMo-A Lightweight Web-Based Tool for the Dynamic Visualization of Additional Information in Business Process Models. In 2021 IEEE 25th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW). IEEE, New York, 345–348.

Thomas RG Green. 1989. Cognitive dimensions of notations. People and computers V 1 (1989), 443–460.

Alexander Grosskopf, Jonathan Edelman, and Mathias Weske. 2010. Tangible business process modeling–methodology and experiment design. In Business Process ManagementWorkshops: BPM 2009 InternationalWorkshops, Ulm, Germany, September 7, 2009. Revised Papers 7. Springer, Cham, 489–500.

Joel Harman, Ross Brown, Daniel Johnson, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, and Udo Kannengiesser. 2015. Virtual business role-play: leveraging familiar environments to prime stakeholder memory during process elicitation. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 27th International Conference, CAiSE 2015, Stockholm, Sweden, June 8-12, 2015, Proceedings 27. Springer, Cham, 166–180.

Joel Harman, Ross Brown, Daniel Johnson, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, and Udo Kannengiesser. 2016. Augmenting process elicitation with visual priming: An empirical exploration of user behaviour and modelling outcomes. Information Systems 62 (2016), 242–255.

Jan Hess, Christian Reuter, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2012. Supporting end-user articulations in evolving business processes: a case study to explore intuitive notations and interaction designs. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 21, 04 (2012), 263–296.

Sonja Kabicher-Fuchs, Simone Kriglstein, and Kathrin Figl. 2012. Timeline visualization for documenting process model change. In 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling and Information Systems Architecture. DBIS Research, Germany, 1–14.

Udo Kannengiesser and Stefan Oppl. 2015. Business Processes to Touch: Engaging Domain Experts in Process Modelling. In 13th International Conference on Business Process Management. CEUR-WS, Aachen, 40–44.

Dimitrios Karras and Rallis Papademetriou. 2017. A systematic review of analytical management techniques in business process modelling for smes beyond what-if-analysis and towards a framework for integrating them with BPM. In The 7th International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design. SciTePress, Setúbal, 99–110.

Selim Kiliç. 2015. Kappa test. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences 5, 3 (2015), 142.

Barbara Kitchenham, Lech Madeyski, and David Budgen. 2023. SEGRESS: Software Engineering Guidelines for REporting Secondary Studies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 49, 3 (2023), 1273–1298. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2022.3174092

Saleem Malik and Imran Sarwar Bajwa. 2013. Back to origin: Transformation of business process models to business rules. In Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2012 International Workshops, Tallinn, Estonia, September 3, 2012. Revised Papers 10. Springer, Cham, 611–622.

Cauê Melo, Tadeu Classe, Márcio Ferreira, and Ronney Castro. 2023. Alternative and Interactive Representations of Public Service Process Models. In Companion Proceedings of the 22nd Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment (Rio Grande/RS). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 332–343.

Cauê de Souza Melo, Tadeu Moreira de Classe, Márcio Rocha Ferreira, and Ronney Moreira de Castro. 2023. Narrativas Interativas como Modelo de Processos de Negócio Alternativo. In ISLA 2023 Proceedings. AIS, Atlanta, 1–10.

Vanessa Mendoza, Denis Silva da Silveira, Maria Luiza Albuquerque, and João Araújo. 2018. Verifying BPMN understandability with novice business managers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, New York, 94–101.

Giseldo Neo, Evandro Barros, Alana Neo, J. Moura, Arthur Correia, and Wanderson Rodrigues. 2023. Integrando BPMN e AIML para construção de fluxos de diálogo para Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 50th Integrated Software and Hardware Seminar (João Pessoa/PB). SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 356–367.

Object Management Group. 2014. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) (2.0.2 ed.). Object Management Group (OMG), Massachusetts.

Rallis Papademetriou and Dimitrios A Karras. 2016. An in depth comparative analysis of software tools for modelling and simulating business processes. In 6th International Symposium on Business Modelling and Software Design: BMSD 2016. SciTePress, Setúbal, 124–133.

Razvan Petrusel, Jan Mendling, and Hajo A Reijers. 2017. How visual cognition influences process model comprehension. Decision Support Systems 96 (2017), 1–16.

Raphael De Almeida Rodrigues, Leonardo Guerreiro Azevedo, and Kate Cerqueira Revoredo. 2016. BPM2Text: A language independent framework for Business Process Models to Natural Language Text. iSys-Brazilian Journal of Information Systems 9, 4 (2016), 38–56.

D Rogers. 2016. The digital transformation playbook: Rethink your business for the digital age. Columbia Business School, Columbia.

Alec Sharp and Patrick McDermott. 2009. Workflow modeling: tools for process improvement and applications development. Artech House, Massachusetts.

Thanner Soares Silva, Lucinéia Heloisa Thom, AlineWeber, José Palazzo Moreira de Oliveira, and Marcelo Fantinato. 2018. Empirical analysis of sentence templates and ambiguity issues for business process descriptions. In OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems". Springer, Cham, 279–297.

F Sobreira Neto. 2009. Gerenciamento de processos de negócio–bpm segundo a gestao empresarial e a tecnologia da informaçao: uma revisao conceitual. XXXIII Encontro da ANPAD 1, 1 (2009), 1–16.

Riad Sonbol, Ghaida Rebdawi, and Nada Ghneim. 2023. A Machine Translation Like Approach to Generate Business Process Model From Textual Description. SN Computer Science 4, 3 (2023), 291.

Stefan Strecker and Kristina Rosenthal. 2016. Process modelling as serious game: design of a role-playing game for a corporate training. In 2016 IEEE 18th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Vol. 1. IEEE, New York, 228–237.

Arthur ter Hofstede, Wil MP van der Aalst, Arthur HM ter Hofstede, and Mathias Weske. 2003. Business process management: A survey. In Business Process Management: International Conference, BPM 2003 Eindhoven, The Netherlands, June 26–27, 2003 Proceedings 1. Springer, Cham, 1–12.

Peter C Verhoef, Thijs Broekhuizen, Yakov Bart, Abhi Bhattacharya, John Qi Dong, Nicolai Fabian, and Michael Haenlein. 2021. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research 122 (2021), 889–901.

Wei Wang, Tianwa Chen, Marta Indulska, Shazia Sadiq, and Barbara Weber. 2022. Business process and rule integration approaches—An empirical analysis of model understanding. Information Systems 104 (2022), 101901.

Peter Weber, Roland Gabriel, Thomas Lux, and Katharina Menke. 2022. Business process management. In Basics in business informatics. Springer, Cham, 175–206.

Michael Winter, Rüdiger Pryss, Thomas Probst, Winfried Schlee, Miles Tallon, Ulrich Frick, and Manfred Reichert. 2021. Are Non-Experts Able to Comprehend Business Process Models–Study Insights Involving Novices and Experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02030 1, 1 (2021), 1–16. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.02030

André Zenner, Akhmajon Makhsadov, Sören Klingner, David Liebemann, and Antonio Krüger. 2020. Immersive process model exploration in virtual reality. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26, 5 (2020), 2104–2114.